To: lbryce
These kinds of laws have one purpose, and one purpose only: to assure that you cannot collect evidence against government officials.
2 posted on
01/24/2011 6:57:31 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And these laws not only need to be reversed,
there need to be laws that punish the government official that attempts to thwart recording of their official behavior.
3 posted on
01/24/2011 6:59:12 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"the audio recording of police officers while performing their duty can affect how an officer does his job on the street. "
Gee, who'da thunk it?
5 posted on
01/24/2011 7:01:14 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"These kinds of laws have one purpose, and one purpose only: to assure that you cannot collect evidence against government officials. "
Apparently these guys have something to hide.
11 posted on
01/24/2011 7:03:31 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: E. Pluribus Unum
There is a school liason officer I know of who has a pocket recorder in their shirt pocket. She records every conversation she has with every student and parent. The school principal told me that the entire police force has the same and does the same to the public. The only twist is that in a public school, students give up their right to not be recorded by attending the school. But the rest of the officers are violating the law.
Almost every government office now posts that cell phones are prohibited and must be turned off. The odd thing is that the rule does not apply to the workers, just the public who pays their salaries.
12 posted on
01/24/2011 7:03:31 AM PST by
blackdog
To: E. Pluribus Unum
--
These kinds of laws have one purpose, and one purpose only: to assure that you cannot collect evidence against government officials. --
And because they are felonies, the government can piggy-back a personal firearms prohibition too. Given the extent of hostility the Illinois government has toward citizen-possessed firearms, I suspect that disarmament is another intentional purpose.
34 posted on
01/24/2011 7:52:40 AM PST by
Cboldt
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yep, you nailed it. This law should be stricken from the record books.
There is no reason for this law other than to protect the posterior of people who may be breaking the law, and by so doing ending their career and possibly going to prison.
37 posted on
01/24/2011 7:59:05 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(All hail the Kenyan Prince Obama, Lord of the Skid-mark, constantly soiling himself and our nation.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
These kinds of laws have one purpose, and one purpose only: to assure that you cannot collect evidence against government officials.Exactly, note well where these laws are in effect, and are prosecuted. Blue states mostly, these laws are a statist's wet dream...
the infowarrior
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson