Posted on 01/12/2011 10:51:31 AM PST by markomalley
Several Jewish groups are criticizing Sarah Palin's use of the controversial term "blood libel" in her video statement on the Arizona shootings. The phrase has traditionally been used to refer to anti-Semitic and false myths about Jews using the blood of Christians, often children, in their rituals.
It is unfortunate that the tragedy in Tucson continues to stimulate a political blame game. Rather than step back and reflect on the lessons to be learned from this tragedy, both parties have reverted to political partisanship and finger-pointing at a time when the American people are looking for leadership, not more vitriol. In response to this tragedy we need to rise above partisanship, incivility, heated rhetoric, and the business-as-usual approaches that are corroding our political system and tainting the atmosphere in Washington and across the country.
It was inappropriate at the outset to blame Sarah Palin and others for causing this tragedy or for being an accessory to murder. Â Palin has every right to defend herself against these kinds of attacks, and we agree with her that the best tradition in America is one of finding common ground despite our differences.
Still, we wish that Palin had not invoked the phrase "blood-libel" in reference to the actions of journalists and pundits in placing blame for the shooting in Tucson on others. While the term "blood-libel" has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused, we wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history.
The National Jewish Democratic Council, a group of Jewish Democrats, said:
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Hurry someone call the waaaa mbulance. geez
The most dangerous thing I see here is the hyper-sensitivity to language. Of course, the Left’s hyper-sensitivity is feigned for the purpose of silencing opposition. I really wish the rank and file lefties would see their leaders for what they are.
Our dictionary is getting smaller by the day.
We’ve become The Nation of the Perpetually Offended
When did the leftist ADL copyright that term? I hadn’t heard about this.
When a non-Jew is attacked, Foxman rises up and says "Stop using our vocabulary. You're on your own. We have no symathy for the false accusations levied against you."
He should be ashamed.
I’m offended that you’re offended that I’m offended that you’re offended.
Gosh. I guess they’re not going to vote for her now.
I wonder if they objected to Andrew Sullivan’s use in describing the hatred towards Gays?
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/proving-animus.html
Since this plays on the oldest blood libel against gays, it certainly implies that the Proposition was motivated by prejudice. Imagine a Proposition that argued that Jews should be denied, say, being school-teachers because of the threat to the kids. No one would dispute that that’s a vile, “blood libel” motive for a constitutional amendment. But when exactly the same bigotry fuels a Proposition to deny gays the core right to marry, a right deeper in the constitution than the right to vote, it’s all apparently motivated by high-minded concern for family life.
.................
Maybe someone should ask them?....lol
Right here is the problem...
People need to use thier brains, she did not mean anything offensive whatsoever...
We live in such a hyporcritical, Politically Correct, I’m offended if you look at me cross eyed society....
People need to grow up, and learn about people, the ones that are truly evil, no one seems to give a rat’s patoon about...
Abe Foxman. Tin cup knocker, and self appointed speaker for all Jews.
No kidding!
Israeli politicians have no problem resorting to the phrase in their battles with their news media even when the issue has nothing to do with a murder:
At least, in this case, the phrase is being used in an accurate context: "Being falsely accused of being responsible for the murder of a child".
But, I guess it boils down to Politically Correct Situational Ethics:
White individual using the "N-Word" = Racism
Black individual using the "N-Word" = Cultural expression
Gentile falsely accusing a Jew of being responsible for the murder of a child = Blood libel
Left-wing Jewish journalists falsely accusing a Gentile politician of being responsible for the murder of a child = First Amendment constitutional right
shame on her for attempting to defend herself!
Jews don’t own that term. The Wall Street Journal used it the other day to describe the liberals nasty attacks.
These groups are trying to manufacture racism by claiming they have some exclusive use of the term and no other group is good enough for it. Which is racist.
Jews should be sympathetic to what Sarah Palin is going thru. Blood libel is a legit term that can happen to anyone.
Palin either needs some coaching on things like that, or is trying to flip off the media. I hope for the latter.
Has hell frozen? Pigs flying? Dershowitz coming to Palin’s defense?? Holy crap!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.