[winoneforthegipper]

I wonder if they objected to Andrew Sullivan’s use in describing the hatred towards Gays?

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/proving-animus.html

Since this plays on the oldest blood libel against gays, it certainly implies that the Proposition was motivated by prejudice. Imagine a Proposition that argued that Jews should be denied, say, being school-teachers because of the threat to the kids. No one would dispute that that’s a vile, “blood libel” motive for a constitutional amendment. But when exactly the same bigotry fuels a Proposition to deny gays the core right to marry, a right deeper in the constitution than the right to vote, it’s all apparently motivated by high-minded concern for family life.

.................

Maybe someone should ask them?....lol

[Yaelle]

Good catch.