Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I thought this deserved a second post.
1 posted on 01/10/2011 4:21:29 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Scanian

the REAL story behind Oklahoma City
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1786859657119150754


2 posted on 01/10/2011 4:23:24 AM PST by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

.....agree that the massacre had to be the fault of the tea party movement in general, and of Sarah Palin in particular.

What they meant to say is Sarah Louise Palin.. gotta have that middle name in for anyone associated with a killer.


3 posted on 01/10/2011 4:24:41 AM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, You can't fix stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Up until this point the left has used these incidents to make inroads on the Second Amendment. Now they’re going after the First.


5 posted on 01/10/2011 4:27:43 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Best piece I have read yet. All true.

This shooter has no ties to the right and everyone knew that right after his name was out.

This is as outrageous as the Wellstone memorial because the media and the left don’t give a rats ass about Giffords or the victims. They just care about twisting the truth for political gain.


6 posted on 01/10/2011 4:29:10 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Its Mark Penns fault


8 posted on 01/10/2011 4:33:19 AM PST by TLEIBY308 (Keep yer powder dry and watch yer top Knot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Bookmark


9 posted on 01/10/2011 4:33:19 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian
To be clear, if you're using this event to criticize the "rhetoric" of Mrs. Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you're either: (a) asserting a connection between the "rhetoric" and the shooting, which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie; or (b) you're not, in which case you're just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which is contemptible. Which is it?
12 posted on 01/10/2011 4:42:33 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian; Mr Ramsbotham

I just read this piece in the Journal and I’m glad it’s been posted here. It was a rational but unsparing analysis of exactly what the left is doing here, and why they’re doing it: simply put, they lost electorally, and now they’re trying the old trick of “winning” by outlawing their opponents. Fortunately, I don’t think they have enough power to do this right off the bat, but they’re hoping the media will jump in and give them the power through the creation of hysteria among the populace.

As a sort of ironic sidelight, I saw here that Congresswoman Giffords was the Representative who read the 1st Amendment when they read the Constitution at the opening session of the House a few days ago.


13 posted on 01/10/2011 4:43:55 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

All the left are missing here is the grave of a congresswoman to dance on.

Disgusting display from the left.


16 posted on 01/10/2011 4:49:05 AM PST by IamConservative (Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day. - Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Bump


21 posted on 01/10/2011 5:16:07 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

KABOOM!

Our guys are firing back.

The lefties were in full swarm mode over the weekend — it’s a little demoralizing to see a tendentious NYT article followed by 1500 comments mostly from liberals — but our side is going to win the day and get the girl (i.e. the public). It’s just too obvious at this point that the facts are on our side and that the lefties WAY jumped the gun. Now our guys are going to make sure they regret it. It’s a target rich environment and they are going to mop up.


22 posted on 01/10/2011 5:17:16 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

23 posted on 01/10/2011 5:18:30 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Hello


26 posted on 01/10/2011 7:48:45 AM PST by sharon baker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

I thought this needed a bump as the term is being used more and by even Palin herself.


28 posted on 01/12/2011 6:38:30 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

The left-wing press is going crazy over Sarah’s use of the term “blood libel.” Glad to see she wasn’t the first to use it.


30 posted on 01/12/2011 7:24:10 AM PST by CedarDave (What is DADT? Obama's response when inquiries are made about his birth certificate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson