Posted on 01/09/2011 11:18:10 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
You are referring here to "Blue Boy", a poster on Daily KOS--let's get this straight - this is NOT Laughner.
There is reference, however, to a 50 year old possible accomplice - I would imagine "Blue Boy" has had a knock on his door for questioning if this person of interest has not yet been found.
I was wondering if that's what he was trying to say.
By the time the FBI finishes their clean-up most of the items on your list won't exist.
To whom did he make death threats before, and why did the police who contacted him not have him psychologically evaluated and steered into some kind of mental health program? Somebody should ask the Sheriff that.
You should make that list with clickable links to document what was said, and then that post should go viral.
conscience dream in which one is aware that one is dreaming while the dream is going on
Joe Biden has been doing that for 35 years.
Get started on it and you can claim the honors.
There are exceptions. Remember the “Operation Tailwind/Valley of Death?” story? CNN had to cough up significant $ after accusing the US military officers of using sarin during Vietnam. Also then-CNN star, Peter Arnett, producer April Oliver and others were summarilly canned by CNN. CNN had to run an on-air apology for a protracted period of time following the retraction.
Accusing Sarah Palin/Beck/Limbaugh/the Tea Party movement, etc. of driving a mental case to murder may just meet the exceptions.
If nothing else, a lawsuit would force said “journalists” and/or Congress(wo)men or the entities that employ them to fork up legal fees, and give negative headlines to the purveyors of the slander. They have to face responsibility for their own actions and words before accusing others. If it takes a law suit, so be it.
Miltary officers aren’t the same as politicians under the Public Figure doctrine. Furthermore, starting a losing lawsuit will just embolden the left when the case gets tossed.
The political elites ARE fearing violence from the left, if what Jeff Kuhner says is correct. He says that the media folks won’t address Obama’s eligibility situation because they know there’s something there, and as long as it is the patriots being shafted there won’t be violence. Once it’s the leftists being found out there will be violence.
IOW, while the media parrots the line that Constitutionalists are violent, they know where the real violence always comes from. That’s why they are pointing the finger and accusing as violent the enemy of the leftist terrorists - to appease the leftist terrorsts and stay safe.
Outrageous, outlandish slander is slander. And, those unfounded statements cannot be made against anyone, even a ‘public figure.’ Some of the military men were considered ‘public figures’ at the time the story was aired on CNN.
If the DHS has ever been involved in this case there will be no questions asked that will get to the bottom of this.
I want to know why Linda Lopez was spouting off about the perp being an Afghan War vet - as if she knew who this guy was and the false implications he made of being associated iwth the military, before anybody was naming names.
Where did she pull that from?
Somebody needs to request to see the reports from when the police visited Loughner for making death threats to somebody - find out when those happened, who he threatened, and what was done about him. But I won’t count on either DHS or the FBI checking any of that out. They already have their meme, that he was a racist anti-Jewish person connected to a website which links to Tea Party events. Now they just need to plant some evidence to support that and silence the evidence already in existence refuting that.
Does anybody actually trust either Janet Napolitano’s DHS or the FBI? Who oversees the FBI anyway? Is that a DOJ thing?
We have to be careful though, because as soon as the name was released, Facebook pages for Jared LAUGHNER (CNN’s misspelling of the name) showed up. So we know that somebody has engaged in a disinformation campaign. And that should also be investigated.
So whatever is claimed, you have to check to see whether it was from the sites legitimately belonging to Loughner before Saturday morning, or whether it was from a disinformation site.
The media should be reporting on the disinformation also, so that people are aware of what is genuine and what is not, and even be aware that there are copycat sites spreading disinformation. Even better, the media should expose who is doing the disinformation.
I don’t know where the gay claims are coming from so I can’t say whether they are genuine.
I don't know his version, but to me it's living in a world that "isn't there"....i.e., utopia, the lefts fascination.
Well, those blog posts could be wrong I guess. lol. It’s not like the media would tell us.
Not only SHOULD you have walked out, but never return. God warns us of being fooled, especially by "churches". Seems like yours is one of them.
I have only had that happen while I was sleeping. I actually had a dream within a dream, although I knew in the 1st dream I was dreaming the 2nd, as well as the 1st.
I have very vivid and colorful dreams.....WHILE ASLEEP, but never experienced one while awake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.