Posted on 01/07/2011 9:00:16 AM PST by Lazamataz
"We still would have lost the election because we had 9.5% unemployment. Let's take it where that came from. The policies of George W. Bush and the Republican support for his initiatives, tax cuts are for the wealth, recklessness by some," Minority Leader Pelosi told CNN
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
Beautiful Neapolitan Mastiff.
That is interesting, as Bush is the reason that Pelosi’s party won the House in the first place.
LMAO - and, here I thought that Obozo had cured BDS!!! Hey Nanci, you might just want to look at the facts before opening that black hole of yours. What was the unemployment rate in late 2006? What happended to the unemployment rate since January 2007? What change in congress occurred in January 2007??? Who took control of the WH is January 2009? Who owns this economy? You Do You Dumb B*tch!!!
This woman is a walking cliche' factory.
It's as if she doesn't have a single original thought in her head. Plus a total absence of imagination.
Is the string that you pull between her shoulder blades or does it come out of her bellybutton?
LOL. All things are about Bush I guess. He’s some kind of dark god to the left. At least they can blame the House now instead of having just the ghost of Bush and a minority in the Senate to blame for all the nation’s ills.
I hope she enjoyed her little (or should I say long) goodbye speech. She won’t be getting up on that dais again.
Did anyone catch Steny Hoyer turn around with a WTF look on his face when that one rat voted for him as Speaker? Hilarious. C-Span for some reason had the camera plastered on Nancy and her grandkids for an inordinate amount of time.
Bush is just a convenient whipping post and they’re stuck on it like a broken record, but this tactic did not work in Nov. People have short memories, esp. in politics. The buck stops with Obama now.
On another topic, did you read Brownstein’s column about “white flight”. If you didn’t, search FR - it was posted about 10 times - LOL.
Brownstein’s conclusions were that Obama’s ‘08 white voters abandoned him in ‘10 and most are unlikely to return. So in order to win in ‘12, Obama has to gin up his largest constituencies in ‘08 (young people, minorities and women) to make up the difference.
No rocket science there, but it begs a few questions, how is Obama going to gin up those constituencies without tacking hard to the left? And when he tacks hard to the left, won’t there be even more white flight? And are there enough of those Obama leaning people to make the difference in swing states he really needs like OH, NC and CO?-to name a few.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.