1 posted on
01/06/2011 2:25:08 AM PST by
Scanian
To: Scanian
If the liberals don't like the constitution then don't swear to uphold it when you take office.
We can find people who will be more than happy to promise to uphold it and you can go home. . . . .
2 posted on
01/06/2011 2:35:52 AM PST by
DeaconRed
(Everything IS Broken. . . . MSM won't report it. . . . The community organizer can't fix it.)
To: Scanian
The last thing present-day liberals want is for the voters to get acquainted with the original liberals’ ideas contained in the U.S. Constitution.
3 posted on
01/06/2011 2:41:01 AM PST by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Scanian
Does anyone know what time the Constitution will be read; and if CSPAN will cover it?
5 posted on
01/06/2011 2:57:38 AM PST by
PoloSec
( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again the 3rd day)
To: Scanian
Well now you know why Obama did not have to produce his Birth certificate,its not Binding,Democrats dont have a Fetish for the Constitution
To: Scanian
What puzzles me is if some people and politicians think that they can just blow off the Constitution, why don't they follow that out to the logical conclusion? The Constitution is the foundational Law of the Land. Yet they want to ignore it when it suits them. Then why would they expect others to completely comply with Obamacare (or any other Federal law)?
Why should I be constrained by their pet laws when they so casually blow off the constraints of the foundational Law?
Funny how the "living Constitution" types don't see this.
9 posted on
01/06/2011 3:09:42 AM PST by
Two-Shoes
(The Second Amendment exists to guarantee & give teeth to the First.)
To: Scanian
We are going to see the “good-n-plenty” clause used for every piece of crap law coming down from above. What I have not heard is how the bill is determined to be constitutional.
10 posted on
01/06/2011 3:22:46 AM PST by
mirkwood
(Palin-Bolton 2012)
To: Scanian
The answer is simple. All Leftists believe in the supremacy of the state over the individual. The U.S. Constitution gives supremacy to individual rights and constrains the state (meaning, in this context, the federal government).
11 posted on
01/06/2011 3:37:38 AM PST by
Wolfstar
("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
To: Scanian
“Let’s stop pretending the Constitution is sacred.”
It may not be sacred but it is the only justification for the existence of the Federal government.
15 posted on
01/06/2011 4:45:17 AM PST by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: Scanian
"The House GOP Weaponizes the Constitution," Excellent! That is exactly what we need to have happen. We need representatives (of the people) who will beat-down the monstrous un-Constitutional leviathan the federal government has become.
...argues that the Founding Fathers "wouldn't cotton to lawmakers exploiting their well-crafted document and turning it into hollow political ammo."
If you think it is "hollow political ammo" that just shows how little you understand (and revere) our Founding Fathers and their well-crafted document. It isn't hollow, as the big-government socialist fascists are about to find out.
19 posted on
01/06/2011 5:31:41 AM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Scanian
I recommend you read Federalist No. 45. There Hamilton specifically says that the powers allocated to the federal government are narrowly defined, few in number and definite while those left to the states are expansive, numerous and indefinite in scope.
20 posted on
01/06/2011 6:07:51 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Scanian
Michelle Malkin on F&F said it well: the Constitution is like garlic to the vampires. Our Constitution is the only thing standing in the way of the liberals’ plans for this nation. They must discredit it—and anyone who supports it—at any cost.
21 posted on
01/06/2011 6:35:30 AM PST by
MizSterious
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
To: Scanian
Liberals, with the Obama administration in the van guard Eh? Is he a regular columnist with this "command" of the language?
22 posted on
01/06/2011 6:36:49 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Scanian
23 posted on
01/06/2011 6:37:59 AM PST by
gunnyg
(WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, November? Ha! ...So Few Can "grok" It.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson