Posted on 01/04/2011 5:38:53 AM PST by TiAhr-02L
Edited on 01/04/2011 7:24:44 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
While some conservatives are stomping their feet like spoiled children over the inclusion of GOProud at CPAC.....
He's a war criminal and there's no reason at all for anyone in the House or Senate to fail to take action to deal with him finally. Certainly we all know what the outcome was of his vote.
And while on the subject of CPAC, why is one of the biggest ISLAMO-FASCIST supporters and enablers (he who facilitated bringing RADICAL Moozies into the W.H. and affected W’s outlook on the War as well as aided groups like terrorist-affiliated, CAIR to become the spokesperson for all Moozies as well as encouraging the DHS, FBI and Dept of Defense to hire many who’s allegiance should have been suspect)—Grover Norquist, still a voice which is listened to and an integral part of the Repulican/CPAC establishment?
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
I certainly "hope" you read this before joining.
Please explain your "modern realities" if you can.
What is the percentage of homosexuals in our country? I keep hearing it is below 3%, but even if it is triple that number, they are still a very small minority attempting to control the masses.
Just a question although I don’t expect an answer because it’s obvious you’re a drive by poster based on your join date. The question is, do you support the call to remove the restriction on gay men giving blood? It has been called by some a non issue with relation to the danger posed by HIV infected blood but instead an unnecessary segregation and a violation of their civil rights. Where do you stand?
It seems the GOP is just not Hip. They have a generational problem, A Hispanic problem, an abortion problem, an immigration problem, a race problem...
And the beat goes on.
The actual percentage of homosexuals in our society is less than 2%, around 1.3%.
But, they have some sort of “project 10” agenda, which is trying to perpetuate the lie that 10% of the population is homosexual. Look for this lie to be interjected into conversation and news items.
The goal is, in conjunction with ENDA, to force employers to hire 10% homos in their workforce, or face “discrimination” suits.
TL:DR
IBTZ
They’ll adapt just as surely as the Greek and Roman empires did, considering this self-same issue.
Methinks you are not long for this site.
Thank you so much, MrB. It is hard to imagine that percentage when 95% of programming and news revolves around them. I had not heard of the "project 10" agenda, but it is beginning to make sense with that piece of the puzzle.
Nearly ALL of the supporters of homosexual marriage and the homosexual agenda only contact with the homosexual community is through the totally glossed over Hollywood portrayal of gays or through the couple of well dressed,arty gays in their work placed.
As someone who has been in the bar industry,I’ve seen the gay community up close and it’s almost ghetto like seedy:
1) rampant drug abuse
2) multiple sex partners in one night—f—k trains
3) seriously mental and social issues—many cannot function in society
4) the young gays are used like a f—k doll and tossed away like a paper towel. Older gays like barely legal teen boys because they lust for the young boys they cannot legally have.
5) the gay community is seriously ridden with diseases and most work in the restaurant business. I DO NOT dine out at any restaurant.PERIOD
Are there gays who have found a life long partner and just want to be left alone?? Yes, I know a few, but they are rare.
The homosexual community is a lost cause that will never clean up it’s own act and are enabled by the usual suspects in Hollywood and academia.
I’m sure that consultants were telling the GOP the exact same thing in 1968.
He who is not a liberal at age 20 has no heart.
He who is still a liberal at age 40 has no head.
Will the GOP adapt to reality or will they bend to propaganda. That's the question.
And politics! Don't forget the politicians.
Your average pro-homo sheeperal gets VERY uncomfortable when you describe, truthfully, what they are supporting.
“You want society to give its imprimatur to the desire of one man to put his p*nis in another man’s *nus as the social an moral equivalent of a marriage between one man and one woman?”
Apparently you didn't do your homework and follow the relevant link from the story.
The homosexual agenda is a big winner for the left.
Under the guise of “civil rights”, they get to destroy the family and criminalize Christianity.
Agreed, the term “hot-tranny-mess” is quite accurate.
I’ve always said, if they want to be accepted as normal then act normal.
Their lifestyle simply doesn’t permit normal.
That is unless society rethinks “normal” which unfortunately is happening...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.