Posted on 01/03/2011 10:20:46 PM PST by pissant
Former vice presidential candidate and reality television star Sarah Palin has remained quiet over the recent repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. But she may have just made a statement... by re-Tweeting a conservative lesbian's columnist's Tweet about 'homos.'
Around 10 p.m. Eastern time on Monday night, conservative pundit Tammy Bruce Tweeted about the recent repeal of the military's discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell policy:
But this hypocrisy is just truly too much. Enuf alreadythe more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed
Tue Jan 04 03:12:46 via web
The idea being, one imagines, that those who are most vocally anti-gay are the people who are most likely to be gay themselves, or at least to have, like, gay stuff "under their bed." Not the most original observation in the world, nobut look who apparently agrees with it!
(Excerpt) Read more at gawker.com ...
LOL!
I found this on the www:
Thank you. I need to add it to a file.
That one too.
Maybe he’s think of the Knights Templar?
;-)
“You dont want to go there. trust me. we just dont want to go there. I know how people in their 20s and 30s think.
I am 24 years old. I can tell you that there are people in my generation finishing their education and starting their careers. Many of these people are on the fence. And contrary to popular opinion.. many of these people will listen to Governor Palins message if she is the nominee and the economy is still a mess.
we are making significant gains on the issue of abortion. 51% of the country is now pro life and opinions are becoming more pro-life in the younger generations. lets keep our eyes on the prize. lets not blow our gains on the social issues where we are making progress.
What if Abraham Lincoln had focused on prohibition instead of slavery. it would have been a disaster.”
I’m not sure what to make of your statement, I’m having trouble understanding. Are you saying I shouldn’t ask what Palin’s stance is on homosexuality?
How do you know that? Serious question.
If I “bump” your post without comment, what does that tell you?
It doesn’t necessarily mean you favor what’s said. It sometimes just means you find it interesting.
I’m not a PalinBot, but I’m not against her either.
My experience with the whole DADT thing is that I can’t think of any conservative potential candidate who stood up and gave their opinion....except for supporters.
I’m really disappointed in all of them.
Pence Opposes Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjWMNrwaRQY
Rick Santorum: DADT is Part of a Secularist Plot to Push Religion Out of the Public Square
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/rick-santorum-dadt-part-secularist-plot-pu
John Thune questions reversal of gay ban
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20101203/NEWS/12030311/John-Thune-questions-reversal-of-gay-ban
Duncan Hunter urges Senators to Reject the DREAM Act and Harry Reids DADT Legislation this Weekend!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2644218/posts
The obvious Team for 2012 is Palin/West.
Prove me wrong.
Tweet? LOL
Definitely a hack job. 'Tis the only logical explanation.
Interesting keywords for this thread. Such classy readers here at FR.
KEYWORDS: anotherpissantpoop; buggeroffpissant; cancelpissantaccount; endpissant; falconpartyof1; fwiwpds; homosexual; larrysinclair; pissant4obama; pissant4rinos; zotpissant;
Oh well. Just like amnesty, TARP, Title IX, and LOST, keeping homos out of the military wasn’t really a conservative position.
It was disappointing to read so many comments trying to justify gays in the military.
Many others fall in another category (”There’s none so blind as those who will not see.”)
If they can rationalize her amnesty, they’ll support anything she says.
if you want to keep playing here you might want to keep that under wraps...there was a purge her recently...JR took out the trash
a good thing in my book...if you're pro homosexual agenda in our culture then you are on the wrong forum
Thanks for the links.
I guarantee you. If Palin comes out in favor of DADT, or if she remains silent on it too long, she will be just another reincarnation of Mitt Romney to me.
Period.
FWIW the Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell train has left the station.
I don't think publicly and forcefully opposing it now will do anything.
The next "Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell" train that is soon to leave is the "Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell" anyone about your traditional Christian moral beliefs. It's now "ok" to be a Christian in the Military service, but don't tell anybody about it and they won't ask.
Right now AFAIK there are Zero potential Presidential candidates who have forcefully spoken up about this issue. I frankly don't know what to do about it. One thing for sure though, we MUST elect a pro-life candidate. That is my litmus test. Only a committed pro-life candidate can expect to undo the damage that this administration has caused. If we can't elect someone committed to life, then we might as well endure another 4 years of the Obamanation.
see post #210
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.