Posted on 01/03/2011 7:09:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
We all are familiar with the debates surrounding illegal immigration: absolute versus flexible laws; amnesty versus deportation or earned citizenship; closed versus open borders; entitlement dependency versus work no one else will do.
We also know the debates over the causation of this perfect storm that has resulted in 12 to 15 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. Was it the Rights desire for cheap labor or the Lefts wish for more constituents, or both?
Was it abetted by the middle-class habit of wanting inexpensive nannies, housekeepers, and gardeners, and facilitated by the professional Latino elites dream of remaking American demography, with the ensuing careerist windfalls?
Of course, there was a desperate Mexicos tripartite aim of obtaining billions in remittances, exporting what it apparently considers a bothersome poor, and winning a loyal expatriate population that seems to like Mexico all the more the farther it is distant.
The sloganeering and mytho-history were necessary relish: Illegal aliens only do the work others wont do; the borders crossed indigenous peoples rather than they the borders; aliens are instead undocumented workers, who all work and who forgot their documentation at the border; Americas own poor are not hurt by the driving down of wages.
But lost in all of this talk is the real mystery at hand. The United States ad hoc, often nonchalantly, without much debate or discussion is currently engaged in one of the largest, most ambitious attempts at foreign aid and nation building in its history, one far more costly and daring that what is going on in either Afghanistan or Iraq. That such a project is not legal, much less approved by our lawmakers, and is funded largely by local and state governments, does not mean that it is not a project nonetheless.
Quite simply, America in almost instantaneous fashion has chosen to take in millions of the poorest citizens of one of the poorer nations in the world in an attempt to transmogrify them into middle-class suburbanites within a generation. That may not be the explicit description of our undertaking, but it surely is one arrived at empirically. And it is a multifaceted political, economic, cultural, and social effort that involves tens of millions of Americans at all levels of society and is proving to be the near salvation of Mexico.
Under the old protocols of legal immigration, we assumed that the worlds poor arrived here, struggled, learned English, assimilated, instructed their children in the exceptionalism of America, and achieved parity but often not until the third generation. All that both the methodology and the results is obsolete today. In short, those who lived in near-18th-century poverty in Oaxaca can become statistical proof of Americas supposed racism and oppression in a nanosecond by simply crossing the border illegally. That they were poor and ignored in Mexico is considered almost natural; that they are still poorer than others after coming a foot north of the border and spending a second on U.S. soil becomes proof of the failure of America itself.
Take away illegal immigration, and in terms of assimilation, intermarriage, integration, income, and general well-being, the so-called Latino population is not all that much out of sync with the rest of America. Factor in millions of Mexican nationals, and we apparently have a massive problem that calls for Manhattan Projectlike remedies, with all of the interested parties predictably participating.
Almost all university race-based research and it is considerable seeks to discover disparities in longevity, health, housing, and general quality of life, and it finds them, those responsible for them, and the government programs needed to address them. Such studies make no distinction in legal status. A recently arrived Mexican national from Jalisco who delivers a baby without much prenatal care is just as much proof of Americas broken health-care system as if she were an American citizen without health insurance. The failure to reach utopian results is as widely lamented as the near impossibility of the task of such massive assimilation is neglected.
Indeed, sometimes this holistic effort at continuing the influx of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens is truly mind-boggling. An unstable Mexico survives in part on tens of billions of dollars of remittances, its second-largest source of foreign revenue. To maintain that precious income stream, the Mexican government has adopted strict diplomatic protocols: (a) do everything possible to ensure that nearly a million Mexicans at least try to leave each year; (b) do not praise the generosity of the American host, but constantly suggest that its motives for trying to close its borders are selfish, racist, or worse; (c) open consulates and establish outreach programs to promulgate the narrative that expatriate Mexican nationals are patriotic colonists who, by leaving their homes, have rightly made the construct of borders irrelevant; (d) never mention the ensuing remittance revenue nor the cost to the U.S. economy of losing nearly $50 billion a year to Latin America nor the subsequent need of federal, state, and local governments to provide housing, food, and education subsidies to Mexican nationals to enable them to send cash home.
So for this landmark project to continue, certain perspectives have to be maintained. Racism is not found among the mostly white Mexico City elites who cynically export indigenous peoples from Mexicos interior in a modern-day sort of helotage. Instead, the real bias lies with the American host that provides work and services without much audit, but fails to ensure near-instant parity with the American middle class.
For the new arrival, there is a vague sort of ideology that he senses he must embrace. In simplified and rather crude terms it goes something like this: Drop hostility for the Mexican government that failed you. Adopt a sense of noble tribal solidarity in which you work hard and receive less than your American counterparts, reflective largely of illiberal prejudice. React with charges of racist insensitivity to any suggestion that an alien in a host country should always investigate means of achieving lawful residency, always try to avoid imposing entitlement costs on the host taxpayers, and always show gratitude as a guest to the host. That parity is difficult to achieve when the new arrival is without English, a high-school diploma, or legality is unmentioned.
Indeed, one of the most baffling aspects of the project is this disconnect between rhetoric and reality. We suspect that illegal aliens, who so bravely have fought to come to U.S. soil, appreciate the differences between the economic, legal, political, and social landscape in America and its counterpart in Mexico. I say suspect because we almost never hear from illegal aliens or their spokespeople blanket and unqualified praise of the United States, its Constitution, its history, and its present system, which does something that Mexico apparently does not.
During the recent DREAM Act frenzy, when a few Mexican students in American universities came forward to announce that they were here illegally, we heard almost no reasons why in the abstract they wished to remain in the country they had traveled to and why under no circumstances were they willing to return to the country where they were born. Indeed, had supporters of the DREAM Act praised the dignity of the United States, its economic robustness, its historical role in the 20th century of defeating totalitarianism, its rule of law, or its meritocratic system rather than postured that America had to adjust its protocols to the desires of the illegal immigrants, the DREAM Act might well have passed.
Of course the illegal alien believes that his labor is underappreciated; of course the host believes that his generosity is taken for granted. Tragically, the ultimate arbiter of that debate is the reality that Mexico wishes illegal immigration to continue and America now does not.
In sum, illegal immigration from Mexico into America is the most radical attempt at nation building on the world scene today, theirs and ours. Stranger still, its narrative assumes a general inability or unwillingness to explain why millions leave Mexico and do not wish to return there, why they so like this supposedly oppressive country and wish to stay and why admission of that fact is apparently neither necessary nor wholesome.
NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, the editor of Makers of Ancient Strategy: From the Persian Wars to the Fall of Rome, and the author of The Father of Us All: War and History, Ancient and Modern.
So, what is the plan to stop the influx? A plan to better manage the influx is not the point. We need to stop 1 billion people from coming here.
Managing the influx really well is actually counter-productive to our long-term stability (unless we want to be a nation of 1.5 billion people).
We can absorb a lot more than we are absorbing now, provided that they come here legally. We have plenty of room for immigrants who love the United States and wish to follow the law to get here. Legal immigrants often become much better Americans than many left-wingers who are born here.
Our corrupt gov’t enables illegals with a wink/nod by issuing them tax id numbers in lieu of SSN’s.
Just about any discussion you hear about the 30 million illegal immigrants currently in this country will completely ignore the notion of a legal process or anything being well managed. The establishment just wants to throw up their hands and say "Make 'em citizens!"
We need to stop the unmanaged flow. Then we can talk about the many real virtues of legal immigration.
Ping!
The RinoCrat Oligarchy ...and the bankers..have decided that about 1.182 billion peons and peasants laboring “out there” in flyover country ought to do the trick.......
I hate Mexico and it’s people. They inhabit the richest land in Latin America and instead of making Mexico the jewel of Latin America they’ve taken this gift from God and turned their land into a corrupt, lawless pest-hole they can’t run away from fast enough. They’ve made it a place where their politicians steal everything in sight and blame the United States. I’m damned sick of listening to their pugnacious whinning that we ‘’stole’’ this country from them and they have a ‘’right’’ to barge in here and myself and every other America is supposed to just shut up and keep paying taxes to support these ‘’undocumented workers’’. BS! We’re a sovereign nation, not a boarding house, we have laws and if they are going to be constantly undermined then soon we’ll be like Mexico. Damn them all to Hell!
This, by the way, is exactly why so many banks were hell-bent on extending mortgages to illegal immigrants over the last 10-15 years -- and why the U.S. government turned a blind eye to these inherently risky loans even as the banking system began to collapse.
Even if we gave all the illegals citizenship tomorrow, who can trust the government to enforce the immigration laws of the future?
The government will just do the same thing over and over again.
If we can’t defend our national borders, then why are we defending the borders of other countries abroad if territorial integrity doesn’t mean a damn thing to the elites?
If the rule of law means nothing, why have any laws at all?
Illegal immigration has nothing to do with race, but facing it forces us to examine who we are as a people.
Do we defend our sovereignty, territorial integrity and laws or do we descend into a formless polyglot with open borders and tolerate lawlessness?
Some people seem to think it's still the 1890s, when millions of unskilled and uneducated who couldn't speak English could get work in all the factories waiting for them. Some of those factories are now in Mexico. And this current "great recession" was triggered by bad debt, just like the Great Depression. Some folks can't figure out that times have changed.
We have Selective Service as a backup should an all volunteer Armed Forces prove inadequate. Between the terrorist thread and a quite lame economy, it's high time to select our immigrants, IMHO.
Relax. Nobody is talking about the entire world coming to America. However, we do have lots of room for immigrants who come here legally. We have to have a system that limits the number of legal immigrants who come in annually so that we can properly assimilate them and help them to become American citizens.
But before that can be implemented, we need to get control of the inflow of ILLegal immigrants. On that we can all agree.
They are wrong. Americans are not procreating and we are limiting legal immigration to below sustaining levels. Without illegal immigration our population would shrink. This country is vastly under developed and can support at least 5 times its current population with no trouble. Want proof? Take a drive through the mid west.
Most anti-immigrant sentiment is not well thought out logic. It is a shallow bumpersticker which reads "what part of illegal don't you understand?" It is driven by ignorance, and fear that American socialist programs intended for American parasites will be drained by illegal parasites...I say Boo-F***in'-Hoo.
Thanx for the ping
Please see my tag line for how I feel about immigrants bringing their children here illegally.
“We have to have a system that limits the number of legal immigrants who come in annually so that we can properly assimilate them and help them to become American citizens.”
Exactly. It’s a matter of controlling our borders so that immigration takes a form that is in the best interest of the United States.
The uncontrolled immigration that Obama wants (which he justifies as compliance with “Human Rights”) is just part of the left agenda of deconstructing the United States by breaking its economy and culture.
What we lack and need now are productive professionals and skilled workers who can fill real jobs and start businesses. If some of them them happen to come from Mexico, that’s OK too.
It is maps like that one which makes me glad to be living in the upper left corner.
No, they don't. Not even close. You're trolling.
Anyone else want a piece of this FROBL troll?
You need to add *Pro-illegal Alien* and *Pro-open borders* to you tag.
We have over one million legal immigrants and half a million illegal immigrants.
To fix illegal immigration:
Secure the border, deport criminal illegal aliens, end in-state tuition for illegal aliens, require eligibility for workers and for those in school, have state and local police check status of all people detained, and say NO to amnesty.
To fix legal immigration:
End birthright citizenship, end family chain migration, focus our immigration on ‘best and brightest’ who can and will work, eliminating welfare for immigrants. Make it so that no more than 10% of immigrants can come from any one country.
“Relax. Nobody is talking about the entire world coming to America. “
The open borders extremists claim ‘nobody is illegal’, so their logic prevents forbidding anyone from coming.
The correct viewpoint on the contrary is to insist that a civil society in America requires a working system of immigration, and a working system requires reasonable limits on immigration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.