Posted on 12/27/2010 7:55:42 PM PST by the invisib1e hand
Sir Elton John and David Furnish have become parents to son Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-John, the couple tells UsMagazine.com exclusively.The baby boy, who was born Dec. 25 in California via a surrogate, weighed 7 pounds, 15 ounces.
"We are overwhelmed with happiness and joy at this very special moment," John and Furnish tell Us in a joint statement. "Zachary is healthy and doing really well, and we are very proud and happy parents."
This is the first child for John, 62, and Furnish, 48. The couple married in 2005 after 12 years together.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Poor child.
It’s Justin Bieber.
That would be a tragedy on top of a tragedy.
____________________________________________
Indeed it would.
This is wrong on so many levels.
While disgusting, Im glad you posted it. Like many here on the FR; I will never, ever legitimize this lifestyle...especially when an innocent, impressionable child is involved!
I’m a let-and-let-live type, but don’t approve of this at all.
I guess they've been trying for 15 years.
The usual modus operandi of the homosexual agenda: “Hey look we’re just like everyone else, we have kids.”
They are living a lie.
barf
The silver lining in an otherwise dark and black cloud is the coming hard times will separate the boys from the men and when they are over, the herd will be considerably thinner, leaner, and meaner than it was when the hard times began. In other words, we will be as we used to be before the "psychiatric counseling" fad started. .The only silver lining in an o
I guess I still don’t get it.
What does that have to do with this?
Are you implying something about the victim in this story?
The only Beeber I know anything about is one you set on stune.
You OK, dude?
Years ago, someone weird I worked with had two lesbian friends that wanted a baby. They got two gay friends, a teacup and a turkey baster to supply the father material. One lesbian impregnated the other using said supplies. Or as this person said, “She lovingly carried the teacup into the bathroom while her girlfriend followed her.” (I was given a more vivid description of the whole process, but I will spare you the disgusting details.)
They then quickly sat down and ate it.
I don’t know why, this non-story is really annoying on several levels.
Somebody should have told them they were going about it all wrong...
Will there be breast feeding?....
lol!
Ok,try to follow this.. this >,was made to go into this o.And when it doe's, 9 months later it defines > and o as parents..Because it was created by a combination of > and o..This > and > creats a cexual preferance, known as gay,not a parent.But a child given to a > and > ,is more of a novelty then a child with REAL parents.I never said i have anything against gay people.Its a cexual preferance.Doesnt make you qualified parents! Posted by CHECOTAH December 27, 2010, 11
This is so incredibly selfish, evil and unnatural—that poor baby will never be nursed or loved by his own mother—something that should be the Natural Right of every baby. What a warped, ugly worldview he will have that will exclude half of the human race. Such selfish people to intentionally deny a human being his fundamental God-given right.
As a man I love my mother deeply. She has been a constant source of inspiration and affection in my life. I find it beyond sad that this poor kid has been sentenced to never being able to have the same relationship with a woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.