Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War rhetoric rises between North and South Korea
Associated Press, fox ^ | 12/23/10 | Staff

Posted on 12/23/2010 9:23:21 PM PST by Nachum

SEOUL, South Korea – One month after a deadly exchange of artillery fire, the two Koreas ramped up their rhetoric, with South Korea's president pledging unsparing retaliation if attacked again and a top North Korean official threatening a "sacred" nuclear war if provoked.

South Korean troops, tanks and fighter jets put on a thundering display of force Thursday as President Lee Myung-bak visited with soldiers at a base near the border, while North Korea's elite marked a key military anniversary by lashing out at the South for encouraging war.

For both countries, the rallying cries and military maneuvers mainly seemed designed to build support at home. But they raised fears anew of all-out war on a peninsula that New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson called a "tinderbox" after returning from a visit to the North Korean capital this week.

The two Koreas and their allies called a truce in 1953 to end three years of devastating war, but violence has flared up from time to time, most recently in the disputed waters off their west coast. North Korea does not recognize the maritime line drawn by U.N. forces, and the territorial dispute in the Yellow Sea has erupted into deadly naval skirmishes.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; rhetoric; rises; war
Obama peace dividends
1 posted on 12/23/2010 9:23:26 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama is to busy vacationing to worry about the Korean problem.


2 posted on 12/23/2010 9:27:11 PM PST by doc1019 (Martyrdom is a great thing, until it is your turn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Bah! Obammy has to worry about human Rights Violations in the US, pesky right wingers and evil US corporations!


3 posted on 12/23/2010 9:53:58 PM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
My father was a member of the 29th Infantry Regiment and was a survivor of the Hadong Ambush while still 17yrs old. He also fought Chinese soldiers to support the withdraw from the North.

Two Purple Heart awards.

One thing he always said about the DPRK Army: Do not underestimate them. They are disciplined, agile and tactically ingenious.

4 posted on 12/23/2010 10:00:59 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Actually after MacArthur landed at Inchon we had the war won within months. After we pushed the north back to the Yalu however, the Chinese came into the war and that is when the SHTF big time. If Truman would have kept his temper under control and let MacArthur have his way we would have won that war and never would have had to fight in Vietnam either.


5 posted on 12/23/2010 11:08:01 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Flat Out Lie Alert!

"One month after a deadly exchange of artillery fire"

South Korea never fired back. An exchange would be two-way. What this was was a one-way, unprovoked artillery bombardment of South Korea.

The AP is trying to establish moral equivalence between a non-agressive democracy and an agressive, nutso, totalitarian communist dictatorship.

The AP is on the NORK's side.

6 posted on 12/23/2010 11:11:01 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Punish Success, Reward Failure. Destroying America is the point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
"Actually after MacArthur landed at Inchon we had the war won within months. "

That's true. And we did it with numerical superiority from August 1950 onward. And, near control of the air space.

The DPRK Army was really only about 6 Divisions.

But to dismiss their relative effectiveness would be mistaken.

They kicked our ass for the first 2 months of the war, often with lesser numbers.

They were very mobile and very aggressive.

7 posted on 12/23/2010 11:14:48 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Dirty little secret: there are approximately 140,000 foreign nationals in South Korea. If the NorKs should screw-up and invade the South, it's going to be chaos as these stupid civilians all try to get out at the same time.

SecDef Gates should order all U.S. DoD staff and service personnel dependents immediately. DoS should order all U.S. civilians out by 1 February 2011.

The DoS should then say that civilians who remain behind do so at their own risk and will get no special treatment if the NorKs attack. U.S. civilians can die just the same as South Koreans.

Unfortunately, many of the U.S. nationals living in South Korea think that being an American gives them some kind of protection and absolutely will not leave until a NorK tank battalion is seen advancing up their street. By then it's too late. But like 1950, these “best and brightest” will not listen. The NorKs will butcher them just like the South Koreans.

8 posted on 12/23/2010 11:16:47 PM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
"The NorKs will butcher them just like the South Koreans. "

It was a NORK tactic to drive civilians before them and through mine fields...while holding the village children back in the promise they would let them survive.

Then kill the children too when they were no longer needed.

They also killed all but a "select" few prisoners they took. They would go through the ritual of tying their hands behind their backs before shooting them in the back of the head...rather than just shooting them at surrender.

Weird and quite vicious.

9 posted on 12/23/2010 11:28:45 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
The AP is on the NORK's side.

Or they could just be stupid and uninformed.

Either is plausible.

10 posted on 12/23/2010 11:31:47 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calex59
If Truman would have kept his temper under control and let MacArthur have his way we would have won that war...

MacArthur wanted to nuke the ChiComms.

Good idea? Bad idea?

11 posted on 12/23/2010 11:35:15 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
You are exactly correct. The NorKs are cruel and totally ruthless. They have no mercy or compassion in their vocabulary.

If there is a “Korean War, Phase 2” — Phase 1 being the 1950-1953 fight — there's going to be a lot of South Korean and foreign national casualties. The foreign nationals are stupid enough that they believe the NorKs won't pull the trigger on a resumption of the Korean War.

I think this is whistling past the graveyard and foolish. However, these were the same kinds of people that were trying desperately to get out of South Korea in June-July 1950 as the NorKs advanced south.

12 posted on 12/23/2010 11:48:35 PM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"MacArthur wanted to nuke the ChiComms.
Good idea? Bad idea?"

Excellent idea. World War III would be a distant memory.
We would have defeated communism instead of merging with it.
The background radiation would be back to normal by now.

Instead, we are still facing WWIII, but have made our enemies strong,
while disarming ourselves.
Sounds like suicide to me.

13 posted on 12/24/2010 3:49:13 AM PST by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Sacred Nuclear Missile.


14 posted on 12/24/2010 4:23:18 PM PST by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; stephenjohnbanker; Quix; M. Espinola
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFnqIdfKVA&feature=player_embedded#!

Video speaks for itself . . .

15 posted on 12/25/2010 6:22:00 AM PST by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; Alamo-Girl; Amityschild; AngieGal; AnimalLover; Ann de IL; aposiopetic; aragorn; auggy; ..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFnqIdfKVA&feature=player_embedded#!

Video speaks for itself . . .

NK THREATENS NUKE WAR ON SO.

DEAR END TIMES LIST . . . COULD WE PLEASE HAVE SOME PRAYERFUL PONDERING AND BRAINSTORMING?

ASSUME:

1. That there IS some super cataclysmic something headed earth's way around the end of 2012.

2. Either it's true--and a great diversity of sources seem to claim it REALLY IS TRUE--governmental, non-Christian, Christian etc.

3. Or, it's not true but the elites believe it's true because of lies from the critters.

4. We know that God is not going to let the earth be totally depopulated. However, Scripture does indicate 1/3 of the population will be destroyed roughly in one war/incident/collection of troubles. And, another 1/3 of what's then left will be later destroyed.

5. IN ANY CASE, LET'S PRETEND, putting ourselves in the minds of the evil elites . . . that there is a super disaster headed earth's way that THEY BELIEVE will depopulate at least people on the surface of the earth.

6. DO YOU THINK THEY WOULD BE INCLINED TO START WWIII BEFORE THEN? Why? Why not? For what purposes?

7. Do you think they might wait to see if anyone on the surface really did survive and use war then to eradicate what's left?

8. What other considerations in all this might be worth tossing around?

THX IN ADVANCE.

16 posted on 12/25/2010 8:55:54 AM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Wars and rumors of wars....

Thanks for the ping, Quix.

17 posted on 12/25/2010 8:59:19 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Those who trust in Him KNOW where they are going...it is the trip that is fraught with uncertainty...


18 posted on 12/25/2010 9:01:15 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Well put.

Thx.


19 posted on 12/25/2010 9:35:46 AM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Thanks for that video. More big trouble is brewing for the Korean peninsula, ignited by the Red North.


20 posted on 12/26/2010 10:26:40 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never "free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson