Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Interesting. I read Baudelaire and Rimbaud and other like toxic crap when I was a teenager, and that plus other influences really helped me into the gutter for a few years. Real gems of wisdom, yeah.
Rimbaud was a bi/homosexual, and I think Baudelaire was too. They and their little coterie were immoral and depraved.
Very telling that you quote Baudelaire as a great savant.
Really? We’ve both lived in Massachusetts. We are both Patriots fans. We both love Christians. A stubborn mind and a closed heart are no way to go through life. C’mon. Give it a try. I don’t bite.
Your promote the homosexual agenda here on Free Republic.
Hi DJ,
Maybe someone can help me. I have always believed that only Congress can change the original laws that state that homosexuality is not conducive to military service. Perhaps I am wrong, but if that is the case, then the only change that has been made is that Clinton’s compromise — don’t ask, don’t tell, has been struck down.
Which means the military can now “ask” and exclude from service anyone who does not measure up to the current military code. I have heard that the Army and Navy leadership think that anyone who believes that gays should not be able to serve openly, needs to leave the service. So they will probably order their people to allow gays to serve.
But I believe the Marine Corps and the Air Force agree with the current code and could start asking and excluding. The only thing that could stop it would be Congress changing the code. Fortunately, nothing even approaching DADT will come out of Congress anytime soon — certainly nothing codifying homosexuality.
At least it is my hope that the military will not change anytime soon, that we can elect a conservative president in 2012, and I pray that our military is never threatened in this way again.
It killed the guy in Washington State that connected with the stallion. Perforated intestine[colon] the dr.said.
I think Baudelaire said that. Maybe it was me.
And, yes, Congress regulates the military as it's one of their enumerated powers.
You know, andy, I've been studying up on homosexual behavior and the agenda since the mid 1980s. You cannot fool me, nor many of the people on FR who are on this thread and well aware of the nature and agenda of homosexuals.
Your straw man arguments - basically saying that we say "all gays are evil" or "all gays want to seduce are children" are a tactic you are skillfully employing to make us on FR look like knuckledragging "haters" and yourself as a kind, rational, caring person who is "conservative" but humane.
The fact is, among the population of those who identify as homosexuals a much larger proportion do indeed hate Christianity and all traditional morality, a huge proportion molest children including seduction of adolescent boys, a huge proportion do indeed support the radical homosexual agenda. Where are the voices of homosexuals who do not support the agenda?
....crickets....
You really think you're getting away with fooling everyone, but I am telling you right now you are not fooling very many people at all. Your attempt to paint DBeers and others here as ignoramuses who need your wisdom to enlighten us, and hateful people who need to become compassionate like your good self, is also offensive and insulting.
I don’t read French any more so I have no idea what great wisdom/or/insult you’re imparting.
Thank you - I’m on and off FR today, got too much to do...
Unfortunately he ain’t zotted (yet...).
I believe that. There's the same danger for lesbians using fake, um, things. One "partner" cannot tell what the other is feeling. A ruptured uterus will kill you too. Deviancy comes with a price.
Well said, DBeers.
No. I oppose the political agenda of radical homosexuals who demand the approval of others, who seek to change the natural order of society, and who wish to impose a perverse idea of “marriage” upon our culture. None of that is acceptable to me. If it were, I wouldn’t be here.
You’re saying that trisham has a stubborn mind and a closed heart.
You’re a total phony and a transparent one at that.
Some of the sweetest and kindest people I know happen to be gay.
A lot nicer than barbarian hard hearted idiots like trisham, DBeers and myself, obviously.
The fact is that andy has spent much time and many comemnts attacking people on FR, but I don’t recall seeing him on any threads criticizing the homosexual agenda.
That pretty much says it all. Plus the quote from his profile page sums it up. “Gays” are actually much nicer than the bigoted creeps here on FR, apparently.
Thanks!
OOps, meant to add your name to the comment above.
You're brilliant as candles extinguished, and your words speak for themselves.
From a homosexual apologist. Yeah. That carries weight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.