Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin won't decide on 2012 run for 'some months still'
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2010-12-17 | Michael O'Brien

Posted on 12/17/2010 8:55:26 AM PST by rabscuttle385

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) said on Friday she won't decide whether to run for president for "some months still."

The onetime GOP vice presidential nominee said that she would wait some time before declaring her intentions for 2012, adding to the crowd of Republican contenders for president who appear set to kick off their campaigns at a later point, compared to the 2008 cycle.

"It's a prayerful consideration. Other folks can jump in and that kind of helps you get the lay of the land," Palin said of her thought process on "Good Morning America" on ABC. "But my decision won't be made for some months still."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; freepressforpalin; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2010 8:55:31 AM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Well I hope whatever decision she makes it’s the best for her and her family. I personally don’t think she will be ready as of yet and should wait till 2016 if she were to run at all. I also think she would serve much better in other area’s but alas it’s her decision to make.


2 posted on 12/17/2010 9:02:33 AM PST by blarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I think she needs to wait for better poll numbers (particularly unfavorables) before jumping into the water. Granted, some of the polls are probably skewed for media consumption but we need to take seriously the frequent unfavorables in the 50s and sample ballots putting her in the low 20s. We need to WIN in 2012 more than we need exactly the right conservative. Four more years of Obama would literally destroy America. I don’t want a RINO, but I’d like to see us consider a conservative with less media baggage than Palin if she can’t make get her unfavorables down.


3 posted on 12/17/2010 9:02:57 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If she decides to run, do you think she’ll choose John McCain as her running mate?


4 posted on 12/17/2010 9:03:42 AM PST by AmericanHunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
She wants to keep McRomney and company in total disarray.

ineluctable

5 posted on 12/17/2010 9:04:56 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The 100th anniversary of President Reagan’s birth is February 6, 2011. It happens to fall on Super Bowl Sunday, but there are a lot of official events the following week. I anticipate Palin announcing during this time.


6 posted on 12/17/2010 9:08:50 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

“We need to WIN in 2012 more than we need exactly the right conservative”

Speak for yourself jerk!


7 posted on 12/17/2010 9:10:36 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I don’t think she is running.


8 posted on 12/17/2010 9:11:43 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
“We need to WIN in 2012 more than we need exactly the right conservative”

Speak for yourself jerk!

LMAO

9 posted on 12/17/2010 9:14:36 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sarah would make a great president, but I think she wisely has decided to cash in on her fame, and do so while her celebrity quotient is high. Leaving the Alaska governorship in mid-term and growing the family bank account through a book deal, TV shows, and personal appearances are the tip-offs.
10 posted on 12/17/2010 9:20:54 AM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: twister881
She's running.

I'd bet dollars to doughnut holes.

11 posted on 12/17/2010 9:29:00 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: twister881; GlockThe Vote

I get a real kick out of people’s opinions...on a supposedly political site no less!

Here’s a clue...

She’s been running since August of 2009.

She has been working a brilliant strategy to perfection and everything is falling in to place.

This past year was to reintroduce herself and her family to America. Now she will turn to serious policy issues with speeches and opinion pieces, along with trips abroad., continuing to draw sharp contrasts to the Obama administration.

She has been absolutely brilliant with her PR campaign, keeping her name front and center.

She will win the nomination in a cakewalk and the White House in a landslide.

It’s going to be fun to watch...her detractors have no idea what is in store


12 posted on 12/17/2010 9:29:26 AM PST by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Ugh Huh keep em guessing.. clouded comments about her running could also be a force magnifier..
Comments both denying her run and others confirming it could have positive impact on the Moonbats..

They are so easy.. Making them go Batty should be easy..
I say use them like rented Donkeys.. confuse them..

13 posted on 12/17/2010 9:34:05 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blarney

How long can she wait to announce? Most of the big dogs came out with exploratory committees in January 2007.


14 posted on 12/17/2010 9:38:24 AM PST by thedudesatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thedudesatx

As far as I know she can wait as long as she wants. It would be safe to say she has already explored I think.


15 posted on 12/17/2010 9:43:07 AM PST by blarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blarney; thedudesatx
"As far as I know she can wait as long as she wants. It would be safe to say she has already explored I think."

You realize that the term "exploratory committee" isn't a term of art, but rather a legal entity that allows candidates to raise funds and spend money for certain things without announcing their actual candidacy. right?

Why is this important? Because of the wildly restrictive campaign finance laws, it's difficult to raise money and spend money without either forming an exploratory committee or a campaign committee. In short, they aren't set up to explore squat. They're set up to skirt campaign finance laws, legally.

16 posted on 12/17/2010 9:50:31 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blarney
I personally don’t think she will be ready as of yet and should wait till 2016

Having lived in Texas under the reign of George W. Bush, whom I DO like, I can tell you she's as "ready" as he was. And she is sure as heck more ready than Barack Hussein Obama was and is. She has served in elective office and she is a citizen activist.
17 posted on 12/17/2010 9:52:08 AM PST by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Yes I am aware thank you.


18 posted on 12/17/2010 9:58:30 AM PST by blarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Well since our current President wasn’t ready for this job and has sucked in every aspect possible I really don’t want another President to also suck. She needs to wait.


19 posted on 12/17/2010 9:59:27 AM PST by blarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blarney

Just curious - how do you think she will be better able to govern in 2016 than in 2012? Other than giving the party insiders a better chance at corrupting her I mean.


20 posted on 12/17/2010 10:02:29 AM PST by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson