I doubt it.
It hasn’t turned all the workers in private company’s into fairy’s.
Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior.
The ones that just work and shut up will stay on.
I think very little will actually change.
I don't sleep with my co-workers, I don't sit in foxholes with them, and I don't have to participate in hand-to-hand combat with them. In fact, physical contact at work is not acceptable, unlike the military where it's part of the job.
No thanks - we don't need these perverts in the military. If they choose to live the gay lifestyle, they can do so in private as civilians. NO TO GAYS IN THE MILITARY!
Sorry. But if you try to fire a “flamer” you’ll face a gigantic lawsuit. Much will change if DADT gets repealed. The magnitude of that change may be slowly perceived, but it will not be insignificant.
really, well in survival training you have to share sleeping bags, we have to share showers, rooms and trust me we do not have privacy .
This is all a sham and any one wanting this or not bothered is just as sick as the homosexuals themselves
Remember Matthew Sheppard was a druggie killed by druggies but became the poster child for gay hate crime movement
There are a ton of gays already serving in the military and all of us have worked with gays in our own jobs, knowingly or not. Corporate America has not come tumbling down because of gays in it’s work force, and neither will the military. If the military can’t handle this, then they sure can’t be strong enough to fight a war.
Some of the posts here are so homophobic that it is embarassing.
Oh yeah? You could not be more wrong. Mentally ill sex perverts DO NOT belong in the military, a little evidence for you.
Ten Reasons to Oppose an LGBT Law or Policy for the Military
The Center for Military Readiness ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608259/posts
Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
FRC ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
CMR ^ | July 23, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
THE REAL PENTAGON POLL: 91% OF SERVICE MEMBERS REJECT HOMOSEXUAL LEADERS - 1 IN 4 WOULD QUIT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635458/posts
MILITARY: Marines lead opposition to repeal of dont ask, dont tell
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635350/posts
Mullen: Troops Who Balk at Change in Gay Service Policy Can Find Other Work
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2636350/posts
...It hasnt turned all the workers in private companys into fairys. Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior. The ones that just work and shut up will stay on. I think very little will actually change.
What are you? Sane?
It is according to what you consider very little.
If “very Little” will change, why are the homosexuals, Leftists, and anti militarylist pushing for it so hard?
Those with any wisdom know that the fall of many great societies and civilizations began with the same common progression; namely, the attempt to normalize and accept all forms of sexual perversion and abomination, chief of which has always been homosexuality.
Going against the laws of God and nature never brings good results, no matter how “enlightened” and “tolerant” said country, society or group thinks it is. Punishment in the form of disease, malfunction and chaos is the rule.