Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope Mark Levine and the Landmark Legal Foundation are on this like stench on a liberal.
1 posted on 12/15/2010 4:00:56 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants

There is no such thing as a Constitution...they make it up as they go along. It’s an old game played by ageless tyrants.


2 posted on 12/15/2010 4:02:14 PM PST by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

Sorry if this violated the Breaking News category. But it needs to get out. Also, could you fix the spelling in Unconstitutional? Thanks


3 posted on 12/15/2010 4:02:57 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Didn’t they pass the bill the House passed last week?


4 posted on 12/15/2010 4:04:22 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

So? There is no controlling legal authority at present, which is why gun control is so popular among Federalists, er, I mean Democrats.


5 posted on 12/15/2010 4:05:07 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The Senate has been doing this for over 200 years. They are ALLOWED to amend a bill sent over from the House. They are also allowed to vote on a resolution that's tantamount to what they will accept ~ then when the bill comes over from the House, to the degree it is different they will amend it in whole or in part to match their own.

They then send their bill (with the stuff they'll go along with) back to the House and the House treats it as a new bill. It has to go through the house and back to the Senate, and soon.

From time to time they've used the reconciliation process to deal with this (where there are minor differences). Where there are large differences this business can go on for many iterations before both houses agree, but it has to ORIGINATE IN THE HOUSE, but it can be changed in the Senate.

The House is not required to be IGNANT of what the Senate will agree to.

6 posted on 12/15/2010 4:07:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Consti-who-tion?

What’s that?


7 posted on 12/15/2010 4:07:58 PM PST by GatorGirl (Eschew Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
According to the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 7, clause 1), all bills relating to revenue, generally tax bills, must originate in the House of Representatives, consistent with the Westminster system requiring all money bills to originate in the lower house which is why the appropriations bills that are enacted begin with "H.R.", indicating a bill that originated in the House. The Constitution also states that the "Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills," so in practice, the Senate and House each drafts and considers its own bill. The Senate then "cuts-and-pastes", substituting the language of its bill of a particular appropriations bill for the language of House bill, then agrees to the bill as amended.
8 posted on 12/15/2010 4:09:29 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Your refusing to accept the facts doesn't change the facts. Matt Dillon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The constitution? How 20th century of you.


11 posted on 12/15/2010 4:14:47 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Just goes to show congress as well as potus hasn’t been watching Glenn Beck’s series on the U.S. Constitution.


12 posted on 12/15/2010 4:14:58 PM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

This would mean something if dems and rinos believed in the constitution.

I’ve been saying this for years. The budget is “written” by the president. That’s not the way it’s supposed to be either.


14 posted on 12/15/2010 4:17:42 PM PST by Terry Mross ( Reagan made one mistake: He chose Bush as his veep. We've been paying for it ever since.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

16 posted on 12/15/2010 4:21:08 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The Tax Bill Passed by the Senate is Unconstitutional

That's only the tip of the iceberg. The election of Hussian Obama was unconstitutional.

17 posted on 12/15/2010 4:22:09 PM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Are you serious? Are you serious?!?!


18 posted on 12/15/2010 4:27:17 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

As someone once put it, “The Constitution presents no obstacle to our government.”


19 posted on 12/15/2010 4:28:30 PM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Bump


20 posted on 12/15/2010 4:28:30 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (WE'RE SCREWED 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

We need to roll up the paddy wagons to the capitol and fill them up


23 posted on 12/15/2010 5:01:07 PM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Hopefully lawsuits will be filed.

Congress can’t ignore the Constitution. If they can, we can, because they derive their power from the states and the people.

It is getting close to revolt time.

First thing Repubs should do is a short simple piece of legislation to end lame duck sessions. Being seated as soon as an election result is declared valid. This is not the 1790s and there’s no reason for lame duck sessions anymore.


25 posted on 12/15/2010 6:10:32 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Bachmann agrees with you you.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2643322/posts


28 posted on 12/15/2010 7:05:06 PM PST by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
related article.

thread: Rep. Bachmann: Tax Bill Violates Article 1, Section 7 of U.S. Constitution

29 posted on 12/15/2010 7:15:00 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Blood of Tyrants.


30 posted on 12/15/2010 7:16:10 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson