Skip to comments.
'Sex by Surprise' at Heart of Assange Criminal Probe
AOLNews.com ^
| 12/2/10
| Dana Kennedy
Posted on 12/07/2010 6:27:44 AM PST by FTJM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Yehuda
21
posted on
12/07/2010 7:02:05 AM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 684 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: FTJM
22
posted on
12/07/2010 7:02:17 AM PST
by
TSgt
(Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
To: Yehuda
EEEWWWWWWWWWWW!
That which cannot be unseen.
Where is the warning label? I already said it’s still early on one coast.
So much for breakfast.
To: FTJM
He was arrested for not wearing a condom. His defense is that if he did wear one, it would leak.
24
posted on
12/07/2010 7:05:41 AM PST
by
chuckee
To: FTJM
Assange's London attorney, Mark Stephens, told AOL News today that Swedish prosecutors told him that Assange is wanted not for allegations of rape, as previously reported, but for something called "sex by surprise," Every time I have sex, it's "sex by surprise".
For both me, and the woman.
25
posted on
12/07/2010 7:06:28 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Lowering Kristinn's IQ since May 21, 1999)
To: FTJM
It would not break my heart if Julian were to hang himself in his cell, suffer a fatal seizure, stuff a pillow down his own throat to suffocate himself, or otherwise do himself in while in custody or even suffer “Death by RuRu” at the hands of some maniacal fellow prisoner. The poor lad looks depressed as hell most of the time so I imagine that nobody would be surprised if he were emotionally unable to handle the stress of being incarcerated.
Hope springs eternal...
26
posted on
12/07/2010 7:07:22 AM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: Darksheare
Sex by surprise?
There’s a teeshirt about that. And a poster...
27
posted on
12/07/2010 7:09:52 AM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 684 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: null and void
28
posted on
12/07/2010 7:16:24 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
To: BubbaJunebug
“... his Wiki.... Leaked”
Too funny.
To: Yehuda
30
posted on
12/07/2010 7:28:52 AM PST
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: FTJM; Constitution Day; SunkenCiv; Slings and Arrows
To: chuckee
He was arrested for not wearing a condom. His defense is that if he did wear one, it would leak. How unfortunate. He evidently can't find one snug enough to fit properly.
I can see where some of his "see the world burn" anger might be originating. Most would just go buy a sportscar, but NOOOooOOO... ;-)
32
posted on
12/07/2010 7:40:53 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
("Oh, Bother", said Pooh... as he chambered another round.)
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: FTJM
How about charging Assange with espionage? Clearly there are espionage laws in the US and the UK. If all they can hold him for is a half baked sexual assault in Sweden it shows how impotent the US DOJ has become.
However, the DOJ and the Obama administration have done nothing to seriously investigate the source of these leaks or to improve US security even months after the first of these leaks was made public. I find it hard to believe that a 22 year old Army PFC stationed in Iraq had unlimited access to every US secret from military memos to diplomatic information from all over the globe and worse still was able to make copies of this information with impunity. If that was the case is says the security of vital US secrets is so poorly secured that even a 14 year computer hacker could potentially gain access to nuclear launch codes.
34
posted on
12/07/2010 8:08:37 AM PST
by
The Great RJ
(The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
To: The Great RJ
To: FTJM
now I finally understand the term, “wikileaks”
36
posted on
12/07/2010 9:16:57 AM PST
by
GotMojo
To: martin_fierro; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; NYC GOP Chick; ...
His lawyer is trying to get the charge reduced to "following too closely."
37
posted on
12/07/2010 10:03:15 AM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: andy58-in-nh
38
posted on
12/07/2010 10:07:20 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: The Great RJ
How about charging Assange with espionage? Clearly there are espionage laws in the US and the UK. If all they can hold him for is a half baked sexual assault in Sweden it shows how impotent the US DOJ has become. Bingo.
39
posted on
12/07/2010 10:12:34 AM PST
by
FTJM
To: Slings and Arrows; Revolting cat!
Premature release of his chakra.
Has Whoopi declared this wasn't rape-rape yet?
40
posted on
12/07/2010 10:18:41 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
