Posted on 12/06/2010 10:35:03 AM PST by BradtotheBone
Censured Rep. Charles Rangel is not in the clear yet when it comes to his ethics problems: he faces a Federal Election Commission (FEC) probe into alleged misuse of campaign funds for his legal defense.
The FEC, according to the New York Post, has taken up a complaint filed by the right-leaning National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) that Rangel (D-N.Y.) used funds from his National Leadership PAC to pay for legal counsel for the House ethics case that ended in his censure last week.
To avoid paying legal services out of their own pockets, lawmakers are only permitted to use money from their individual campaign accounts or legal defense funds.
The 20-term lawmaker, who was once the chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, on Sunday called his censure "embarrassing" and "painful" in his first television interview since he was dealt the punishment.
Rangel's trial went ahead last month without the congressman having legal representation. His attorneys at the firm Zuckerman Spaeder dropped him as a client in October, and he later told the ethics committee he could no longer afford their services after sinking $2 million into his defense.
NLPC's complaint, filed late last month, accuses Rangel of violating ethics rules by allowing his PAC to pay Zuckerman Spaeder $293,000 in 2010 and $100,000 to the law firm Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe in Jan. 2009.
A spokeswoman for Rangel noted that the attorney for his National Leadership PAC "has authorized the use of its funds for its legal expenses." The spokeswoman also said the NLPC is "not an unbiased organization" and accused it of making "inaccurate allegations."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
And why didn't the "ethics" committee ask Charlie about them when he was right there.
“And why didn’t the “ethics” committee ask Charlie about them when he was right there.”
They probably would had if Charlie hadn’t walked out of his own hearing..
Color me SHOCKED, just shocked I tell you!!! ; )
Oh boy Chuck is in for it now he’s going to get another yelling at. /s
Rangel was sanctioned for committing 11 violations of House ethics rules
(and Nancy Pelosi ONLY read ONE COMPLAINT in public)
The 80-year-old was also ordered to pay back taxes to the government.
(no doubt without penalty and interest)
Just one of the many libs who belong in jail. Maybe someday
the law will apply to just one of them!
When does he face felony tax evasion charges?
Or he could wind up being Secretary of Treasury.
I guess that it was just too much to expect Rangel to not violate the ethics standard while he was being investigated for ethics violations.
When your in the good old boy club as long as he’s been your above the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.