Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'NK could target mainland next'
The Korea Times ^ | 12-02-2010 | Kim Young-jin

Posted on 12/02/2010 6:35:44 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Uncle Ike

Uhh yeah. And the local chiefs who are farming women and cheap labor from that flood are going to love that.

Mobilizing a million troops in China these days isn’t that easy, especially when there is money to be made by letting them in the country.


41 posted on 12/02/2010 8:42:37 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Okay - which argument are you making??

Either

“China can’t even keep NK refugees out of their country. If the balloon goes up, that trickle becomes a river.”

Which, you seem to imply, would be an insurmountable problem for China

or

“especially when there is money to be made by letting them in the country.”

IOW - no problem...

Can’t have it both ways....


42 posted on 12/02/2010 8:48:00 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I wonder what the norks would do if we gave them absolutely nothing - no concessions, no food, no money, zilch - in response to aggression?


43 posted on 12/02/2010 8:56:51 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

It’s something the government of China doesn’t want.

It’s something the criminals in China do want.

In China, there is no real central authority. Everything is controlled by bribes and money. For instance, in China, it is against the law to eat certain rare animals. That means the only people who can eat those animals are politicians and the people responsible for arresting the people who break that law.

Honestly, I doubt that Bejing has complete control of all of the military.


44 posted on 12/02/2010 8:57:49 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

People today sound alot today about NK like they did about Afghanistan prior to 9/11.Before 9/11 all the human interest groups was preasuring the US/UN world body to do something about the atrocities the taliban was inflicting on women.Next thing ya know, some NK terrorist group will be accused of a terrorist attack on our homeland and we will be required to act upon it. Just sayin.


45 posted on 12/02/2010 9:06:03 AM PST by eastforker (Visit me at http://www.eastforker.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

“Then the US jumps in and says: “We’ll give you $10 billion if you start playing nice again.” “

Well, so far, we haven’t done that yet. In fact, this is arguably the most agressive response we’ve seen to a DPRK provocation is a long time. The ROK shelled the DPKR military base pretty good. The US/ROK war gamed in the Yellow Sea with the GW CAG. The ROK is conducting live fire artillery drills next week in and around the NLL. Japan/US is going forward with large war games next week. The US/ROK are discussing additional war games to take place before the end of the year or early next. The ROK has mobilized additional forces to the 5 Yellow Sea Islands. The US had deployed a few weeks early the Carl Vinson CAG to the region. And for the past week the US/ROK/Japan have told China to go pound sand when asked to come back to the table for talks . . .


46 posted on 12/02/2010 11:29:18 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Agreed, but this is the first time a hard stance has been put forward. Perhaps we’ve learned our lesson.


47 posted on 12/02/2010 12:11:04 PM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Maybe we have, maybe we haven’t. But it looks like for the time being the ROK/Japan/US are trying to break the pattern of behavior. Accordingly, I would not presume a predictable outcome to this current crisis


48 posted on 12/02/2010 12:48:16 PM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Makes sense then that the U.S. refused to remove our land mines.
A real deterrant to the norks advancing.


49 posted on 12/02/2010 12:56:38 PM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) The more I see and know Obammy the more I think he's an a-hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yes, it is lose-lose...for South Korea. Of course, we would like nothing more than to be rid of the North, but SK will keep making sure they stay alive...and dangerous. Well, it’s all fun and games till someone gets nuked, and the South better hope that’s not us, because that peninsula will glow in the dark for 10,000 years. Assuming we have a real President, of course.


50 posted on 12/02/2010 5:11:25 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson