Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot

The better view is that if someone has actual evidence, there is nothing to gain from sitting on it.

The longer information sits, the less relevant or effective it becomes.


50 posted on 12/01/2010 11:49:27 AM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: El Sordo

At this point the only value in coming forward with evidence at all is to 1) help the public realize how untrustworthy Obama and all his enablers are; and 2) to get a criminal investigation of the crimes committed by Obama and his enablers.

SCOTUS is evading this issue. Period. We’re not going to get justice out of them. My theory is that Soros has told them he will collapse the world economy if they make a right decision. Seems like the retired military folks who provided Lakin with counsel who is just going to drop the eligibility issue rather than get a bad precedent from compromised judges might possibly be thinking the same kind of thing. Obviously they don’t think that either the military or the civilian appeals process can be trusted to give a right decision on eligibility, and they must have a reason to think that.

Justice Thomas himself has said that they are “evading” the eligibility issue. Nothing for a conservative justice to boast about so he must have had a different reason for bringing up the issue in the context of discussing Sotomayor.

So in a very real way Lakin’s brother could choose not to publicly disclose any evidence he has because he doesn’t want to “throw pearls before swine”, choosing to save it for a prosecuting attorney to use instead.


57 posted on 12/01/2010 12:57:13 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: El Sordo
The better view is that if someone has actual evidence, there is nothing to gain from sitting on it.
The longer information sits, the less relevant or effective it becomes.

In the context of this issue, those are patently absurd statements.

You want to believe the brother is yet sitting on evidence when there is every reason to believe it was delivered to Lakin's legal team.
There are some, of course, who would like to see the evidence prematurely made available to the public so as to gain additional time to attack its credibility or develop a response.

The time and place at which any such evidence will be offered or presented will depend primarily on the litigation plan; it will not be at some ineffective and premature publicity stunt.

You can have the last word.

71 posted on 12/01/2010 2:45:34 PM PST by frog in a pot (Wake up America! You are losing the war against your families and your Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson