[frog in a pot]

The better view is that if someone has actual evidence, there is nothing to gain from sitting on it.
The longer information sits, the less relevant or effective it becomes.

In the context of this issue, those are patently absurd statements.

You want to believe the brother is yet sitting on evidence when there is every reason to believe it was delivered to Lakin's legal team.
There are some, of course, who would like to see the evidence prematurely made available to the public so as to gain additional time to attack its credibility or develop a response.

The time and place at which any such evidence will be offered or presented will depend primarily on the litigation plan; it will not be at some ineffective and premature publicity stunt.

You can have the last word.

[El Sordo]

What I beleive:

-Lakin’s brother has no information or evidence that in any way affect the matter.

-The trail will come and go without any contribution from Lakin’s brother.

-It is both a human failing and a common movie trope for people to tell themselves that “the truth is out there” and it will come to light when the time is right. But... The world doesn't actually work that way.