Posted on 11/19/2010 11:14:23 AM PST by privatedrive
$90 bil in clean energy technologies $50 bil for Home Affordable Mortgage Program $46.7 bil in discretionary DOE spending $28.7 bil for Pell Grants in FY10 $28.4 bil (DOE) to develop clean and secure energy $25.5 bil to increase State Medicaid $12 bil extend unemployment payments $7.2 bil to expand broadband deployment $6 bil for the Perkins Loan program. $5.1 bil for the Office of Science $4.4 bil for the Indian Health Service $4 bil for National Infrastructure Innovation Fund $3.3 bil for Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program $3 bil increase K-12 education programs in the ESEA $2.5 bil for health centers to underserved populations $2.4 bil for energy efficiency/renewable energy programs $2.3 bil to clean energy manufacturers $2.3 bil in applied energy research and development $1.8 bil in Supporting Student Success initiative $1 bil school meals and child nutrition programs $980 mil for the Federal Work-Study program $989 mil for Head Start and Early Head Start $950 mil to recruit, develop, retain, and reward teachers $870 mil for student aid administration. $757 mil for SEOG $545 mil for fossil energy climate change technology $405 mil for successful and innovative teaching $110 mil for efforts to strengthen health IT policy $286 mil for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality $286 mil for research of different medical options $313 mil for GEAR UP $222 mil across HHS to expand research related to ASD $169 mil for the National Health Service Corps $103 mil for Admin on Aging’s Caregiver Initiative $118 mil for Foreign Languages Studies (IEFLS) $31 mil for GAANN $64 million for LEAP $10 million for Javits Fellowships
¿pıɐs noʎ ʇɐɥʇ sɐʍ ʇɐɥʍ
Youpeoplewhoknowonlyonewaytospellawordneedtoworkonyourcreativity.
While I agree with vouchers in general, your numbers are way off.
I’m only 45 and have to pay for my own insurance. It isn’t even great health insurance, but it costs me $8800/yr.
You know what would lower healthcare costs hugely ? Switch the income tax to a flat 10% rate. It would raise the same money, but would stop inflating doctors’ fees to pay their 40% tax rate. They do employ lower-taxed lower-wage people, but still 25% of doctors’ fees are going straight into the tax coffers.
I figured my numbers were off, I was just throwing a number out their because I didn’t know. Hubbys retired military. Part of the problem is insurance itself. The docs have to hire people to deal with insurance companies and that costs money. The flat tax would be excellent. It would get rid of the IRS. That would save us tons of money right there. And it would get rid of tax cheats. How you going to cheat on your taxes when it’s built into everything you buy?
It would be better to (a) either limit the amount offered for Medicaid to an amount based on income or lower the threshold for Medicaid, and (b)require the amount the individual does not need for the health plan they chose to go into a health savings account - which would result in more people taking less costly plans and paying more medical expenses directly out of their health savings account, causing them to be more frugal and do more comparison pricing for the services they pay for that way.
Excellent!!!
Also, my insurance will pay for drugs from any phrama, and that includes the hospital. The hospital always charges way more then say wal-mart. Yet the insurance company gives no incentive to look for the cheapest drug prices. Which would help save millions, if not more. Maybe the co-pay should be adjusted accordingly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.