Posted on 11/19/2010 8:29:41 AM PST by Heracles Basileus
FEMALE suicide bombers are being fitted with exploding breast implants which are almost impossible to detect, British spies have reportedly discovered.
The shocking new al-Qaeda tactic involves radical doctors inserting the explosives in women's breasts during plastic surgery — making them "virtually impossible to detect by the usual airport scanning machines".
Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2903793/Radicals-deadly-booby-trap.html#ixzz15kIA8A00
gives titty twister a whole new meaning
They are the breast explosives on the market.
TSA says all breast implants will need to be done with a zipper now.
The only solution I see to this is somebody’s suggestion that there be a bomb-proof building built at every airport that each passenger must walk through separately. If they are wearing an explosive, it will immediately detonate.
Anyone with more than an A cup will automatically be placed on a no fly list.
They aren’t profiling so what are they going to do about this little cog in the security equation?
Will this surgical procedure be covered by Obama's new Health Care plan?
Was it you, yesterday, that said that we can’t use profiling against terrorists because that would open the door for profiling blacks in domestic law enforcement?
I believe whoever said that may indeed be on to something.
These bombs can’t be too big or too powerful, and a lot of the impact would be absorbed by the bomber.
But one would presume the larger the breast the larger bomb, so we know who to start profiling.
Wonder if they’d go with the double-barrel, or a single-shot?
I believe that is how they activate the bomb.
So, once the woman has the implants, how does she detonate them? Does she have a probe she can hook to a power source, then impale her implant and light it off?
And, since our current groping plan is in response to the Xmas day bomber, who had explosives in his shorts, how will TSA treat us in response to this?
Next, we’ll hear of penile implants or rectal stuffing.
and the reference to “bow guns”
i always wondered what we’d do if they came up with a liquid explosive that wasn’t immediately toxic and wasn’t effected by acid. They could simply drink it, and set if off internally when the time came.
Or my idea for a screenplay — the terrorists all drink nitroglycerin, so if you attack them or shoot them, they explode.
Why don’t they use dogs at airport check lines? Wouldn’t they be able to smell explosives more reliably than mechanical scans?
Give me the job inspecting those boobs. Bet I could tell the difference. Where does the line start to apply?
Is nothing sacred to these people?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.