What they know is 1)Murkowski write in votes were given special consideration where “voter intent” was determined instead of following the law,
2)All the other votes were machine counted and were NOT screened for “voter intent”
3)Murkowski is NOT 10,000 votes ahead as reported. Miller is AHEAD in uncontested votes.
4) Some precincts are reporting 100% turnout, districts that went heavily for Murkowski.
5) Ballots were turned pre-sorted because someone had already gone through them in violation of the law
And I am sure there is much more.
Thanks for that info, I understand it better now.
“Miller is AHEAD in uncontested votes.”
Actually, according to the State, Miller is down by 1975 uncontested votes. But there are so many discrepancies that no one but the Miller camp and the good Tea Partiers are willing to uncover, that Miller might have won. He’s only down by .77% in uncontested votes.
I want to know how many contested NOT counted votes are also for Miller, because there are Miller write-ins that weren’t counted from what I’ve heard.
Then there are all the other discrepancies in the precincts we’ve pointed out above. Over 300 voter complaints to review with valid grievances related to vote fraud.
Agree with everything you said. If the machine didn’t read the filled in bubble correctly for Miller ( think back to college or high school when you thought you filled in a bubble correctly and it was marked wrong because you didn’t fill it in completely, didn’t completely erase your wrong initial bubble you filled in by mistake or “overfilled” your bubble so the machine graded it as wrong— been there seen this up close), then your vote didn’t count for Miller. So if you’re going to hand count Murkowski votes for “intent” you need to hand count Miller votes as well, it’s only fair. How much you want to bet Murkowski counted on this different counting method to push her over the top?