Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This looks like a good move. I wonder if the 0bama administration will try suing the Airport Authority to keep the TSA involved.
1 posted on 11/18/2010 5:11:38 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: NRG1973

Can they do this? I hope so.

This is a good trend. I like it.


2 posted on 11/18/2010 5:13:49 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

This is a good start. Hopefully some major centers - O’Hare, Hartsfield, Kennedy, LAX? - will follow suit. To hell with the TSA and Napolitano.


3 posted on 11/18/2010 5:14:12 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Sounds awesome. :)


4 posted on 11/18/2010 5:14:48 AM PST by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Kudos, but NOT FAST ENOUGH. Nor is it a warranty that the private companies will avoid indecent grope-em-ups and debasing porno-scanners.


5 posted on 11/18/2010 5:16:23 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973
"if all goes as planned, the private security firm could take over in about 12 months."

Empty your pockets please.
Turn your head and cough.
Enjoy the flight.


6 posted on 11/18/2010 5:17:26 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Sounds to me like Disney, Universal Studios and Seaworld pulled a few strings and called in some favors.

You don’t mess around with taking away Mickey’s tourism monies I guess.


7 posted on 11/18/2010 5:17:50 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Evers; Joe Brower; NautiNurse

Free enterprise and sensible ideas...in Florida!


8 posted on 11/18/2010 5:18:28 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Completely shocked that our goverment allows this. I imagine if this caught on, Big Sis will start working to stem the tide. After all, there are government contracts in play that must be protec...err, I mean people that need to be protected.


9 posted on 11/18/2010 5:21:27 AM PST by The Iceman Cometh (What do Snap-On and Obama have in common? They're both tools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

TSA is a unionized Federal employment program nothing more. If we were serious about airline security we would do what the Israelis do. Also, the airlines should be responsible for their safety and security not the Federal Government.


11 posted on 11/18/2010 5:22:59 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother (Victory or Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Let all the airports opt out of TSA and then force Obama to watch Janet Napalitano going thru body scanners 24/7.


12 posted on 11/18/2010 5:23:04 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Terrorists will act and behave like they are on a Disney vacation returning home, will board planes at TSA exempt airports.

Sanford is a favorite airport for many travelers visiting the theme parks, many from the UK say they prefer to travel there right about this time of the year.

ANY flights from the UK should use bomb sniffing dogs, its almost impossible to fool the dogs and the trained handlers.


15 posted on 11/18/2010 5:25:57 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

John and Ken (LA 640am) had a guest on Wednesday. He was a recognized aviation industry security expert. He addressed the issue of private firms taking over airport security.

His take on it was that it would do little good to have a private firm take over. His reasoning was this.

1. private firms are required to use the same equipment and methods, if they wish to be approved by the FAA
2. private firms have to pay the same salaries as the TSA

This being the case, he thought privatization would be a Pyrrhic victory.

He suggested statistical profiling should be implemented. Don’t base it on race or religion. Base it on groups that stats could prove are high risk.

Further he suggested frequent fliers should be able to submit to a background check and receive ID that would let them board without hastle.

He stated that non-frequent fliers could do so also, but the cost would be prohibitive.

He said he thought the minimal check would suffice for those not in the high risk groups, and that only the high risk groups should be subjected to the most extreme searches.

He made quite a bit of sense IMO.


16 posted on 11/18/2010 5:26:50 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Your next chance like this? About 2044. Vote popularity and don't waste time with the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Hire an Israeli company. I’d feel safe with them doing the security.


18 posted on 11/18/2010 5:30:13 AM PST by McGavin999 ("I was there when we had the numbers, but didn't have the principles"-Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

This is fantastic. I think all of us should call our favorite, local airport and ask them to do this.

They better do it quickly, I’m sure BO & Big Sis will change the rules to get all airport screeners under the UNION umbrella.


19 posted on 11/18/2010 5:31:05 AM PST by Reagan69 (Let me know when those health insurance premiums go down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973
"I think TSA is overstepping its bounds," said Mica.

Well gee, what was your first clue, Sherlock? How about the whole US government overstepping its constitutional bounds? Too bad we can't opt out of unconstitutional wealth transfer payment from the producers to the welfare parasites.

21 posted on 11/18/2010 5:33:02 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973; JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; ...
We live in interesting times.

Like yourself, NRG, I wonder if the TSA will let them.

I predict they are going to get the same treatment as everyone else who elects to "opt out".

Florida Freeper


28 posted on 11/18/2010 5:45:12 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

This scan stuff would not have detected the 9-11 scabs (maybe their box cutters, but that would have just been confiscated), and muslim women get a pass.

What is wrong w/ dumping political correctness? Well, we don’t want to embarrass anyone...LOL!


33 posted on 11/18/2010 6:00:30 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Not going to happen under Obama! Remember the Drilling Ban in the Gulf of Mexico. 1st a court said no, then Obama changed the wording, then the court said no again. Well we now have an approval process in order to drill in the Gulf. Want to guess how many wells have been drilled? Same thing will happen to this situation. 1st Obama will said the airport cannot drop the TSA, then a court will rule against Obama. Next Obama will revise the program and loss the next court case. Lastly Obama will put in place a program to review the private firms to determine if they are acceptable. So as I said a non-starter.


36 posted on 11/18/2010 6:29:00 AM PST by Lockbox (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973
I would recommend contacting small airports that can really benefit from the increased inconvenience of the large ones. Just this morning, I submitted the following to the "Chicago-Rockford International Airport (RFD)": Dear sir or madam:

I am a long-time supporter of the Rockford airport, and appreciate the convenience and service it provides.

I believe the RFD can get some positive news coverage, Chicagoland interest and possibly a new passenger carrier if you opted-out of TSA screening, as Sanford (Orlando) airport has. I am sure that a private company will earn its expense by providing both great safety and intelligent screening, without the use of backscatter x-rays and frequent body searches.

Please consider this suggestion as one more way to show that RFD is a better way to go.

Sincerely,


I received the following polite response:

Thank you for your email offering a suggestion regarding the TSA screening process. I certainly appreciate you taking the time to let us know your thoughts on this and I will forward it on to the appropriate folks.

Thanks again and have a great day!

Pam

pguentert@flyrfd.com

38 posted on 11/18/2010 7:26:57 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

This is great news. Now how about getting them kicked out of Orlando International.


39 posted on 11/18/2010 7:28:30 AM PST by Hoodat ( Don't touch my junk, Bro !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson