Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin Says She Could Beat Obama
ABC News ^
| Nov. 17, 2010
| MARY BRUCE
Posted on 11/17/2010 2:27:51 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Sarah Palin says she is seriously considering a run for the White House, and she believes she could beat President Obama in 2012, the former Alaska governor told ABC News' Barbara Walters. "I'm looking at the lay of the land now, and ... trying to figure that out, if it's a good thing for the country, for the discourse, for my family, if it's a good thing," Palin said in an interview scheduled to air in full Dec. 9 on ABC as part of Walters' "10 Most Fascinating People" of 2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 581-598 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Sarah’s lips to God’s ears.
I believe she can win, and I know she would fight all the way ... no holding back!
To: Artemis Webb
Now, that’s a shame, since the DEMS allow voting in general elections more than once.
62
posted on
11/17/2010 3:10:47 PM PST
by
Catsrus
(Have)
To: Servant of the Cross
63
posted on
11/17/2010 3:11:07 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Artemis Webb
Let her run and fall flat on her face then if she’s “unelectable.” My God people, what are you afraid of? If she’s truly that bad then why are her critics still attacking her? Wouldn’t it make more sense to encourage her on and then laugh when she fails?
To: Anamnesis; onyx
Well said, thanks for the very good post.
65
posted on
11/17/2010 3:14:01 PM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Grunthor
ineluctable |ˌiniˈləktəbəl| adjective unable to be resisted or avoided; inescapable : the ineluctable facts of history. DERIVATIVES ineluctability |-ˌləktəˈbilitē| noun ineluctably |-blē| adverb ORIGIN early 17th cent.: from Latin ineluctabilis, from in- not + eluctari struggle out.
66
posted on
11/17/2010 3:14:16 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: onyx
Love it! Thanks for the ping!
67
posted on
11/17/2010 3:15:41 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
>> President Palin is ineluctable.
Absolutely brilliant!
68
posted on
11/17/2010 3:16:57 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: Anamnesis
Palin will not be able to win by hiding out on Facebook, Twitter, Fox News, or any of the friendlier talk shows. She already gave an in-depth interview to the New York Times magazine, and just spoke to Barbara Walters. Jake Tapper is also someone she corresponds with.
She is already dipping her toe in enemy territory.
To: goldstategop
You just seem to be growing tired of having to associate with the conservatives here at FR.
70
posted on
11/17/2010 3:18:19 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Mitt Romney supporter, and anti-tea party figure, Eric Cantor, won this battle.)
To: GlockThe Vote
I don't see why she wouldn't replicate W's electoral math in either of his elections.
Is there a reason Obama won't go back to the default mode of those? His magic is gone....long gone. Heck, she might even pick up a purple state from him.
It's a long way off, try on post #35 for size and we'll all see how this shakes out.
71
posted on
11/17/2010 3:18:33 PM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
She may think so, but that’s why we have a primary campaign. To separate the “wheat from the chaff” so to speak.
Lets see how she stacks up against the other candidates as far as her policy approach and defense of conservative principles before we can agree with her.
72
posted on
11/17/2010 3:20:26 PM PST
by
DeusExMachina05
(I will not go into Dhimmitude quietly.)
To: Lady GOP
73
posted on
11/17/2010 3:20:28 PM PST
by
Third Person
(Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.)
To: DemonDeac
The Democrats are praying that they get to run against her. Yeah, they're really crafty, them Democrats. And so smart, too. Just look how bad they snookered us in the midterm elections.
/snark
74
posted on
11/17/2010 3:21:48 PM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: USSR Didnt Fall
Uh, you need to use a dictionary, son.
75
posted on
11/17/2010 3:23:09 PM PST
by
rintense
(The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
To: Lakeshark
Look I like her a ton. She is amazing person. However, I am still confident she can win. And this has nothing to do w her. Its the media, the fickle public, the mushy moderates, etc I worry about.
76
posted on
11/17/2010 3:24:47 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(I'm not Anti-Obama - I'm Pro-America)
To: Lakeshark
Look I like her a ton. She is amazing person. However, I am still confident she can win. And this has nothing to do w her. Its the media, the fickle public, the mushy moderates, etc I worry about.
77
posted on
11/17/2010 3:25:06 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(I'm not Anti-Obama - I'm Pro-America)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
By "beat" Obama, she literally means "beat".
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe. She really needs to read a few Milton Friedman books before she starts campaigning though.
79
posted on
11/17/2010 3:26:56 PM PST
by
dajeeps
To: rintense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 581-598 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson