Posted on 11/17/2010 8:51:32 AM PST by kingattax
New York Times article details Palin's political machine.
Sarah Palin has clarified for the first time in a newly published interview that she is seriously considering a presidential run.
"I am," Palin told New York Times writer Robert Draper when asked if she was weighing a run in 2012. "I'm engaged in the internal deliberations candidly, and having that discussion with my family, because my family is the most important consideration here."
In a personal profile to be published in the upcoming New York Times Magazine, Palin said her decision would involve "evaluating whether she could bring unique qualities to the table," admitting the biggest challenge would be proving her record.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Redistricting happens in 2011. This is real important. Look it up.
There were some important wins in NH (senate race), FL (senate and governor races), and IA (senate and governor races). Look those up.
There were some important wins across the board in battleground states such as OH, PA, FL, and also in MI, WI, IN, NC (major, major something happened here), SC, and on and on. Look all this junk up.
So tell us all about those 270 electoral votes.
Daniel’s is electable and got over 58% of the vote in Indiana when Obamacrackers won Indiana in 2008. I think he deserves a serious look, and he’s not a total social liberal.
“Sarah Palin endorses Tom Tancredo” — November 1, 2010.
“Sarah Palin endorses Sandy Adams” — November 1, 2010.
That’s hardly in advance.
But yes, she did endorse John McCain and Michele Bachmann in January.
I haven't found any supporters of Sarah Palin who can answer for me some of the questions it brought up. You seem to think they were answered...so can you tell me where?
Thanks.
Christine O’Donnell, Senate, 2008: 140,584 votes
Add $4 million and lots more exposure of her.
Christine O’Donnell, Senate, 2010: 123,025 votes
Bristol and DWTS? Try Willow Palin and Facebook. Get with it!
Your link http://2012.presidential-candidates.org/Immigration.php
No thanks. This is not an authorized issues statement from Palin. You will note that she hasn’t announced yet.
I’ve read many of her statements and some of that stuff is unsubstantiated. Although, they did get it right that she doesn’t support amnesty.
The link you have provided for Palin does have quotes from Palin.
It would be premature to consider most of these her policy or issues statements.
Election Day Nov 08...many of these statements happened when she was the VP nominee and was defending McCain’s issues stands, which as you know is the duty of a VP.
Her actual stands on illegal immigration have been documented on here before and are incomplete. But she always stresses securing the Border as the top and first priority.
I’ve been sharing those links today with DWTS doofuses.
You should see their heads explode!
I like Sarah. I do. And I feel for her as her idiot daughters are a major embarrassment.
But to many FReepers who worship DWTS and see NOTHING wrong with what Bristol (and now Willow) are doing... I like to poke fun and agitate them.
LOL, you’re desperation is not a virtue. It’s just desperation.
The only head that have been exploding have been liberal heads all across the nation...as they succumbed to Bristol Palin making the finals.
Did you read the links in post 149?
Explain how you can defend THAT!
Why would I give a left two chits about some kids talking on facebook.
I read them last night and was quite amused at the opposition research going into Palin’s daughters lol.
Are you a child stalker or something?
Are you a child stalker or something?
________________________________________________
That’s right. You can’t debate the issues in a mature manner, so you go vulgar.
Pull your head out pal. You’re on Free Republic. Not the DUmp.
“Sarah Palin endorses Tom Tancredo” — November 1, 2010.
“Sarah Palin endorses Sandy Adams” — November 1, 2010.
That’s hardly in advance.
But yes, she did endorse John McCain and Michele Bachmann in January.
Tancredo and Adams are both VERY, VERY tough on illegals.
http://www.sandyadams.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=news.details&ArticleId=58
But, HOW? DETAILS. She's silent for a reason. It may be her weak spot. A virtual fence does us no good. If we let illegals stay here, that is akin to amnesty. jmo
Why do you say she's silent? I've heard her say clearly it was the number one priority to seal the border and stop the illegals from coming in. She's said in a number of times in a number of ways.
You seem to not want to listen, or go with those (and there are quite a few here) who THINK she really means amnesty when she's saying stop the influx now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.