Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I agree with Hugh here, time for a change in Republican debates.
1 posted on 11/15/2010 9:04:24 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon

Agree.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 9:05:33 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade, There are only two sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

With all due respect to Nancy Reagan...Hewitt is correct.


3 posted on 11/15/2010 9:06:22 PM PST by Artemis Webb (I support Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Hewitt is exactly right, and he should be on that panel.


4 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:13 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
or a panel of Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved --

No, how about some unknown people who understand the Constitution asking hardcore questions? Why does it have to be celebrities?

Enough with the celebrities.

5 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:43 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

I agree.


6 posted on 11/15/2010 9:10:47 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

I agree with Hugh here, time for a change in Republican debates.

*************

Indeed.


7 posted on 11/15/2010 9:13:58 PM PST by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

I may get flamed for this, but it’s also time to move on from the Reagan adoration.

I strongly believe in understanding history, honoring it, and learning from it, but the continual references to Reagan are wearing thin. He has been gone for decades.

The conservative argument must be made for today and for the future, not looking backward. Continually talking about the Reagan years makes it look like today’s conservatives want to live in the past and have no answers for today’s problems.

Reagan’s place in history is assured. He was right about many things. But a huge percentage of the electorate has no personal memory of his Presidency.

We need new leaders who can articulate conservative principles for today’s world.


8 posted on 11/15/2010 9:14:28 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
Totally agree. I fact I really don't see anything wrong with Rush, Hannity or Mark Levin moderating a Republican debate. Why have the usual lefty enemies moderate a Republican debate, doesn't make sense in any way, shape or form.
9 posted on 11/15/2010 9:16:01 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
Brit Hume and Major Garret would give the panel some heft as well from the cable news perspective. And how about Laura Ingraham? Thomas Sowell?
10 posted on 11/15/2010 9:17:04 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Oh yeah. It’s time to STOP letting the libs and Rinos define the debates or the where these debates will happen. Open forum, head to head with only a mediator for enforcement of the time limit.

Libs, Socialists and Rinos will be destroyed in this setting.

That damn old truth will be destroy liars in the light of day and it’s enemies will be exposed.


13 posted on 11/15/2010 9:19:47 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Why are we even talking about Presidential debates next Spring. This is rediculous 18 months before a Presidential election and 8 months before the 1st primary. It’s time to roll this back to have Presidential Primaries in the Spring instead of immediately after New Years 2012.


15 posted on 11/15/2010 9:23:45 PM PST by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
NO-NO-NO ...to taking the spot light off Obama.

NO-NO-NO to letting liberals control the early agenda!

17 posted on 11/15/2010 9:29:10 PM PST by Baynative ( 11 / 2 / 2010 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

I agree and glad someone spoke out against it.


18 posted on 11/15/2010 9:31:28 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
The first ever "Talk Radio Republican Primary Debate."

Would half the candidates dare show up?

19 posted on 11/15/2010 9:34:11 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
OK, I understand why we shouldn't let leftist MSM outlets control the debates. That's a no-brainer.

But can someone explain to me the problem with having the debate at the Reagan Library? I don't see how the two issues are connected, or what Hewitt is getting at with respect to Nancy Regan. It seems you could obviously have a conservative dream team panel, but still have it at the Reagan Library. What gives?

22 posted on 11/15/2010 9:35:16 PM PST by GunRunner (10 Years of Freeping...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

We have Parties ... Tea Parties, no debate necessary, SH Politicians just need to do what Hillary said she wanted to do “LISTEN”

I think we just shouted pretty loud, we can Shout even louder 2012...

I’m tired of Politicians PERIOD ... they better hear us soon or they better get out of the way ... by 2014 we may be able to retire the Majority of “Career Politicians” and one of the first cuts is their RETIREMENT! (I actually have a four or five page Rant in my head, I’ll share it later)

TT


24 posted on 11/15/2010 9:41:48 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I don't mind liberals... I hate liars...there just tends to be a high degree of overlap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

In fact, let’s have Rush, Hannity, MedVed, Coulter moderate the Democratic debates.

Fair’s fair!


35 posted on 11/15/2010 10:47:43 PM PST by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Spring 2011 is just too damn early for presidential debates. I have no issue with the kick off being at the Reagan library. As for moderators… we go through that every cycle. Rush, Hewitt and the rest would be no better choosing or asking questions. I’d like to see Brit Hume moderate though.


51 posted on 11/16/2010 7:10:10 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
No more media-driven "debates"! Republicans should insist on something like my proposal to fund a train an independent organization whose mission would be to provide expert debate moderators who can control their personal biases.
52 posted on 11/16/2010 7:30:44 AM PST by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson