Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It took Nappy an awful lot of words to give a non answer.
1 posted on 11/15/2010 11:33:11 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: jazusamo

This woman is simply dull and ignorant.

Perfect for the Obama Cabinet.

I wouldn’t hire her as a waitress at an Applebee’s.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 11:35:10 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question

Huh?

3 posted on 11/15/2010 11:35:49 AM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Hey Janet Incompetano - either the muzzies, who are known to blow up planes, get the full treatment, or no one does - equal protection under the law!


4 posted on 11/15/2010 11:36:07 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

WHY IS THIS EVEN UP FOR DISCUSSION?


6 posted on 11/15/2010 11:37:14 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
“We’re doing it because we need to keep powders and gels and liquids off of planes that are unauthorized just as we need to keep metals off of planes,” Napolitano said. “This is being done in recognizing that we all have a collective role in our security and we all know and can recognize that there are threats and risks that have been articulated by those who seek to harm the United States, particularly in the aviation environment. And, so, you know, what we are doing is designed to really be risk based, to be intelligence based, to be layered like I said, when you get to the airport at that screening center, that’s really--these TSO’s [Transportation Security Officers] are really the last line of protection we have for the aircraft and that’s the way we’re going to evaluate things.”

As inarticulate as this paragraph is, how did she ever get elected to anything? It sounds as if gels, powders and metals are the problem not Islamist nutjobs. Sheesh, am I glad I gave up flying? You betcha!

8 posted on 11/15/2010 11:37:24 AM PST by Vor Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Okay, let me get this right? I would have to either have a full body scan or be pat down in order to fly BUT if I was wearing a Muslim female religious outfit then I could have my hands swiped and someone feel only my head and neck? Does anyone else ever feel like they are living in the Twilight Zone or is that just me? Just a thought.


9 posted on 11/15/2010 11:37:46 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Fine, if improper screenings are performed...then everyone who would normally board that flight should refuse to fly.


10 posted on 11/15/2010 11:38:44 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Separation of Church and State actually applies here. The Muzzies are hiding behind their “supposed, imposed” church law.


11 posted on 11/15/2010 11:40:14 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

People should refuse to fly unless Muslims get the same treatment we do.

After all, they are the ones we need to worry about.


13 posted on 11/15/2010 11:41:56 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Front page of Drudge has a pic of a nun getting the pat down! I’ve seen it myself. My 87 year old mother in law has gone through this BS! Can the new congress do something about this idiot before she gets us all killed or we just stroke out from the insanity?


15 posted on 11/15/2010 11:42:55 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

er uh hem haw.

Exclude the only group that is attacking this nation.

Why are we kissing the rumps of Isalmic supremacists that want to see us dead?

When is CAIR going to go after “so called Islamic” terrorists and point out they are giving peace loving muslims a bad name? Oh that’s right, CAIR got caught supporting terrorist groups.

They can claim they are a clean organization “now” but that does not right the past associations.


16 posted on 11/15/2010 11:43:05 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Janet from another planet speaks.


17 posted on 11/15/2010 11:45:09 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Only a confused and demoralized people, filled with the sillyness of Political Correctness, would not be able to be clear of mind on what to do here.

I remember when we used to laugh at our Village Idiots — and now, we quietly just do what they say too.

The only unforgivable thing here is that it’s even worth discussing as though it was a serious topic.

CAIR is making fools of us all, with our official willing acceptance of their arguments as being worthy of serious consideration.

If we can never manage to sort this out according to Common Sense, then we, as a people, will richly deserve the storm that will consume us all.

Idiots.


19 posted on 11/15/2010 11:45:39 AM PST by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Okay. That settles it. I’m wearing a hijab the next time I fly!

;-)


20 posted on 11/15/2010 11:47:10 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Civil disobedience. What if a group stages a dedicated protest by purchasing the cheapest possible one-way ticket and then refuses the body scanner and pat downs all while wearing a burka or hijab?


21 posted on 11/15/2010 11:47:22 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

TSA Bookmark.


22 posted on 11/15/2010 11:49:17 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
“We’re doing it because we need to keep powders and gels and liquids off of planes that are unauthorized just as we need to keep metals off of planes,” Napolitano said.

Complete moron.

24 posted on 11/15/2010 11:50:59 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
...AND I'm going to open a hijab rental outlet in every major metropolitan airport in the country. People will be able to rent a hijab at the airport from which they are departing and return it at the airport at their destination. My stores will be called We-Be-Hijabs and we will accept all major credit cards. I'll even try to cut a deal with the airlines to allow people to trade in frequent flyer miles to pay their hijab rental fees.

I'll probably even be able to get 'stimulus funds' to start my new business.

26 posted on 11/15/2010 11:54:07 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

“If You See Something, Say Something”.

So we can get your name right on the lawsuit against you by the DOJ.


30 posted on 11/15/2010 11:55:21 AM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Archie Bunker posited the ultimate solution to airliner security back in the 1970s:

His plan: EVERY passenger is issued a loaded handgun as they board the plane. The weapons are retrieved as the passengers disembark.

It’d be simple, effective and MUCH less expensive than the crap we’re doing now.


36 posted on 11/15/2010 12:00:45 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson