He didn't address it in the Declaration of Independence, nor is it mentioned in the Constitution.
Quite frankly I'm fed up with the nanny state "social issues" that should be addressed in the home, not by legislators.
I'm fed up with people telling me, and others about: trans fats
salt
sugar
Happy Meals
obesity
over/under nourishment
smoking
lesbians
gays
I'm surprised Lindsey Graham and Barney Frank haven't proposed a Federal Commission on Mutual Masturbation and its effects on palm hair, blindness, and hemmorroids.
It’s the gays who want the state to define marriage to be between a man and another man. They should leave the current laws alone.
They can screw each other in the privacy of the bedroom but they shouldn’t expect the state to give them any new benefits.
Nanny State Big Gov has prevented the states from enacting the laws their citizens want.
Thanks to Big Huge Nanny State Fedgov, no states can pass laws against sodomy, porn, or abortion; or on a host of other issues that should be up to the states.
Thank you, Huge Nanny State Big Brother Gov!
State laws against sodomy, porn, obscenity and so on were consdidered not only perfectly Constiutitonal but indeed necessary for society, until the commie founded ACLU and leftist Supreme Court justices forced their Commie Nanny State Huge FedGov on us.
You don’t know what the hell you are spouting about.
If you do not see the difference between big government meddling and us defending our God-given Life and Liberty, then what the hell good are you to our cause? Get the hell off of FR, MORON!!!
Nobody ever sticks up for masturbation.
You need to pay attention. The people trying to regulate your diet are the same people who are trying to foist same-sex marriage on society, and stop you from speaking against it.
The Secular Left Christian bashers have co-opted and twisted these norms -—and are now trying to and indeed have succeeded in codifying them.
Default has now become gay and infanticide - OK— — the norms.
Privacy? If only...!
Where have you been, by the way?
Look. Here is the problem.
Abortion is murder. Nobody who looks at the broken, bloodied, hacked-up bodies of babies burned alive and dismembered in their mothers’ wombs or decerebrated and beheaded even as they are being born, can deny that this is the violent murder of a human being. No culture that permits such brutal, abominable cruelty can long survive. There *IS* a God, and He will not accept excuses for such things as the shedding of innocent blood.
For the sodomites, we don’t really care what they do. The problem is that the sodomites want more than tolerance. They want to flaunt their perversions in our faces. They want to indoctrinate our children. They want to destroy the traditional definition of what constitutes a family, upon which our nation was based. If they are allowed to prevail, we will see polyamorous, pedophilic, incestuous, and even bestial “families” emerging, if God doesn’t allow our destruction beforehand.
Finally, fiscal conservatism must be linked with social responsibility and Biblical morality. If you are fiscally conservative and a moral libertine, moral depravity will ultimately get the best of you, and no amount of money will repair the damage.
With the exception of abortion murder, allow people to make choices.
However, we must be FREE to teach our children that NOT every choice is acceptable or honorable.
There is no better way to judge the character of a man than by the choices he makes.
BUT ee must be FREE to teach our children that certain ideologies are harmful and even murderous, like communism and islam.
The sodomites, perverts, libertines, and islamophiles do not want you to be free. They want you to be required by law to affirm their perversions.
Here’s a deal. I won’t flaunt my sexuality in your face if you won’t flaunt yours in mine.
I won’t force indoctrination of your children if you don’t force the indoctrination of mine.
I won’t force you to do business with or rent a home to my Christian family if you do not force me to do business with or rent a home to unmarried “couples” or sodomites.
Quite frankly so am I. It is and has been a long war -a "culture war" as it has been termed.
Do you imply that retreat is the best option?
Ask yourself -do you see things being changed from the bottom up with families and society doing the changing and reshaping government or do you see a top down change being imposed by government on families and society?
Looking at Proposition 8 in California provides a good example as a battle in this culture war. The nanny state wants to impose homosexual marriage.
I myself grew tired of seeing the nanny state being imposed -this is the very reason to fight -not retreat... Enough ground has been given up -it is time to take it back.
Damn. You mean on top of everything else, I'm also going to get hemorrhoids?