Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State to hasten Senate write-in ballot count (Alaska: Write-in 41%, Miller 34%)
ADN ^

Posted on 11/03/2010 9:21:03 PM PDT by Chet 99

The overseer of Alaska elections says officials will begin counting write-in ballots in the Senate race Nov. 10 in Juneau.

Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell tells The Associated Press the intent is to give citizens and candidates a clearer sense of who the write-in vote getters are. Sen. Lisa Murkowski waged a write-in campaign in a bid to keep her job after losing the GOP primary to Joe Miller. She is among 160 qualified write-in candidates.

Read more: http://www.adn.com/2010/11/03/1534774/state-to-hasten-senate-write-in.html#ixzz14HcsMTb5

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: US: Alaska
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: boycott

“If you’re going to derail someone, do it with a good candidate.”

That is heresy. You must always pick the most conservative candidate. Their resume, experience, communications skills, etc. are unimportant.

Now you will be labeled a RINO for the rest of your time here.


21 posted on 11/03/2010 9:58:50 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The other two would have sent Harry in retirement.


22 posted on 11/03/2010 9:59:41 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Just like that moderate Fiorino took out Boxer?


23 posted on 11/03/2010 10:01:40 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Actually, that is what I meant - in another way.

40.95% + 34.34% + 23.64% + 1.07% = 100%

Mooocoowski's 40.95% - Miller's 34.34% = 6.61%

And to break the Moooocowski Miller tie, add 0.01% to 6.61% = 6.62% The 6.62% is what Mooo-ski has to lose of the total votes casted(the write-ins not belonging to her) in the Alaskan senate election.

And/or as you say, Mookooshki has to lose .0662/.4095 = 16% of the write-in ballots casted.

24 posted on 11/03/2010 10:02:26 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: boycott

We don’t have any way of knowing that. Especially with his son and SEIU in charge of the voting machines. I don’t think anyone could’ve won. The fix was in - regardless of who the opponent was.


25 posted on 11/03/2010 10:03:41 PM PDT by Catsrus (Have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: funfan
<1>What do you think- would people really write in another name than Lisa I would think the ones who wanted Joe would have just voted for him on the ballot not on the write in. Is it possible that people actually voted for the other names and not hers.

With all the falderal and notoriety related to write-ins in the news, I would think a large number of individuals could have written any number of crank names and comments, if only for the sheer pleasure of doing something completely different! That may have been especially true if clever Democrats trying to be cute thought their candidate didn't have a chance.

26 posted on 11/03/2010 10:07:17 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

So true.

1st time I heard Angle speak, I cringed. Same for O’Donnell. Now that doesn’t mean I don’t like them, it just means I thought they were both weak candidates.

I hope that the Tea Party Express learns from this election. They could have a positive influence if they do a little better homework. I believe the problem may be that they didn’t have the time to plan as they needed. Hopefully they’ll be a little more organized next time because I honestly wouldn’t have felt excited about voting for Angle, Miller, or O’Donnell.

Folks can call me RINO all they want.


27 posted on 11/03/2010 10:07:53 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Harry Reid probably stole at least 10% more of the aggregate vote than Democrats (including Reid) normally steal in Nevada. Even if the Republican would have led more, then Reid would have stolen more. Even if the Republican somehow emerged from Election Night with more votes than Reid received, the Reid machine could discover or fabricate tens or hundreds of thousands more in time to declare victory. For Reid, chicanery is a way of life.

In Alaska, either Miller wins or some write-in candidate wins. If Lisa Murkowski (correctly spelled or it shouldn’t count) doesn’t get the votes, then the Republicans win. Even if she does, she’s still a “Republi-crat” albeit a badly corrupt one.

And every American has problems. No one is perfect. Character assassins and spin doctors spare no one, turning normal actions into veritable hideous scandals. Republicans, especially national partisan leaders, should conduct primary elections amicably and then rally around the nominee after the primary.


28 posted on 11/03/2010 10:13:33 PM PDT by dufekin (Name our lead enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Islamofascist terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Just like that moderate Fiorino took out Boxer?


You should have followed NV a little closer. Otherwise, you wouldn’t compare the two.


29 posted on 11/03/2010 10:14:03 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo; boycott; pissant

>>> That is heresy. You must always pick the most conservative candidate. Their resume, experience, communications skills, etc. are unimportant. Now you will be labeled a RINO for the rest of your time here.

Tell me ‘bout it. I barely escaped a lynching last night making a similar point.

Murkowski holds the seat for the republicans. Good enough under the circumstances and considering the dem alternative.


30 posted on 11/03/2010 10:18:12 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

IIRC, if someone writes in a name and it is misspelled, it become null and void for the intended nominee.


31 posted on 11/03/2010 10:18:24 PM PDT by peggybac (Restore America and restore her honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Republicans, especially national partisan leaders, should conduct primary elections amicably and then rally around the nominee after the primary.


I voted straight republican. There were a few that made me hold my nose but I still voted straight republican.

I rallied around and voted for the nominee after the primary and now I feel very comfortable saying Miller, Angle, and O’Donnell were weak candidates.


32 posted on 11/03/2010 10:18:36 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Sarah Palin should also consider her endorsements more carefully. She should have stayed neutral in Nevada. All 3 candidates were conservative, so let the people decide.


33 posted on 11/03/2010 10:19:50 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: funfan
What do you think- would people really write in another name than Lisa I would think the ones who wanted Joe would have just voted for him on the ballot not on the write in. Is it possible that people actually voted for the other names and not hers.

She is likely to get enough of the write-ins to win, unless the Alaskan Senate election drew extra voters that were not going to vote anyways so they could write in Mickey Mouse or scribble their names or names of others on the list because they are friends and family or whatever.

34 posted on 11/03/2010 10:20:30 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: boycott

“I don’t have as much of a problem with them doing it in DE but they blew it in NV. Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkanian would have beaten Reid soundly. Both were good candidates too — neither should be called RINOs. Sharron Angle just wasn’t a good choice. They blew it. I believe they did in AK too.

If you’re going to derail someone, do it with a good candidate.”

The Tea Partiers ruined us in Colorado too. Their Republican governor’s candidate was so bad, he failed to pull in 10% of the vote, thereby relegating the Republican Party to minority status throughout the state of Colorado in all elections in the future! Furthermore, they nominated that idiot Buck over Jane Norton, who would easily have beaten Bennett.


35 posted on 11/03/2010 10:21:14 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from The Right Stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: boycott

“...I honestly wouldn’t have felt excited about voting for Angle, Miller, or O’Donnell.”

And if you felt that way, imagine how a “swing” voter feels.


36 posted on 11/03/2010 10:22:39 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Joe Miller is an excellent candidate.

The problem is that the RINOS permitted Murkowski to run after she lost the primary.


37 posted on 11/03/2010 10:28:02 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

“...I honestly wouldn’t have felt excited about voting for Angle, Miller, or O’Donnell.”

-

And if you felt that way, imagine how a “swing” voter feels.


So true.


38 posted on 11/03/2010 10:28:32 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Murkowski? You mean Charlie Crist in a skirt?


39 posted on 11/03/2010 10:30:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

Sarah Palin should also consider her endorsements more carefully. She should have stayed neutral in Nevada. All 3 candidates were conservative, so let the people decide.


Exactly! I would have been very mad if I had to vote for Angle or O’Donnell. I wouldn’t have been excited about voting for Miller either.


40 posted on 11/03/2010 10:31:52 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson