Skip to comments.
Eric Cantor lays out 22-page game plan (in run for House Majority Leader)
Politico ^
| 11/03/2010
| Jake Sherman
Posted on 11/03/2010 12:14:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Virginia Republican Eric Cantors official announcement of his run for House majority leader came with a twist: a 22-page game plan on how to change Congress.
Cantor, currently the GOP whip, began calling colleagues to shore up his support and wrote a letter promising to change Congress saying he wants to drain the swamp rather than learning to swim with the alligators.
The document is entitled Delivering on Our Commitment and promises a broad range of sweeping initiatives ranging from spending cuts to to bringing each item of the Pledge to America to the floor for a vote. Its a bold plan that shows Cantor wants to be taken as a serious House reformer and policy leader as he ascends to the no. 2 slot in the new GOP hierarchy.
Cantor is not expected to face serious challenge from fellow Republicans for majority leader.
One major reform hes facing is scheduling the House floor, which POLITICO reported last week. Cantor is proposing committee hearings be uninterrupted by votes, and is also urging committee reports to be brought to the floor for debate.
Cantor says he wants to do away with legislation recognizing individuals, groups, events and institutions. In the past, Congresses in the past have passed legislation that honors entities such as baseball teams and universities. Republicans, the Virginian thinks, should only name post offices once a month.
Hes also taking aim at oversight, urging individual members to conduct oversight on their own, asking committees to write quarterly oversight reports and boosting field hearings.
Spending, a major priority of Republicans, also gets top billing from Cantor. He says he will try to ensure that all new spending has explicitly listed how it will be paid for and how the legislation fits into the constitution. Hes likely going to upset some appropriators, because Cantor re-iterated his plan to end earmarking, promising to not consider House legislation that includes the member directed spending. He is also vowing to defund piece by piece Democratic health care overhaul.
On jobs, Cantor is planning to conduct an immediate and comprehensive review of existing and proposed government rules and regulations echoing a major complaint of Republicans over the last year.
In a throwback to the past, Cantor is aiming to bring rescission bills to the floor under an open rule so members could cut federal spending they deem as wasteful. In addition, he plans to continue the YouCut program a plan much maligned by Democrats which put spending cuts in the hands of online users. In the beginning of the last Republican majority in 1995, the GOP had internal clashes over spending cuts, especially when members sought to slash items in other Republicans districts.
Entitlement reform is also in the crosshairs of the Virginia Republican. President Barack Obama, Cantor says, wont work with Republicans to enact real entitlement reform unless it includes major tax increases. But Republicans, he said, should lay out their plan and encourage Democrats to do the same.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: congress; ericcantor; majorityleader
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2
posted on
11/03/2010 12:17:03 PM PDT
by
kenavi
(The good ol' US of A: 57 state laboratories for the future.)
To: SeekAndFind
Works for me...now Get er done!
3
posted on
11/03/2010 12:17:23 PM PDT
by
RVN Airplane Driver
("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
To: SeekAndFind
His letter is reproduced
here
Dear Republican Colleague:
Congratulations on your election and for being a major part of a new Republican resurgence. For the past two years, Democrats have refused to listen. Now that we have been given a trust we will not make that mistake.
I have long believed that success for the Republican Party is tied to success for America. Thomas Jefferson once remarked that governments are republican only in proportion as they embody the will of the people, and execute it.
To that end, we must govern differently. Not just differently than the Democrats, but differently from our previous majority. And job number one is to focus on more jobs for more Americans and to shift the economy from stall to forward. Its time to produce results. Americans are asking for the opportunity to assume responsibility and get back to earning success. I also believe we need to change the culture of Washington. I believe that we must change the culture of spending that has prevailed for far too long. And I believe we need to change our expectations of the Congress, the Leadership, the committees, and of each of us.
I have announced my intention to stand for election as Majority Leader because I am results oriented and I want to help lead that effort and bring about these changes. I write not only to ask for your support, but also to outline some thoughts as to how we can seize the opportunity and make these changes.
Let us be under no illusion many of those who cast their vote for Republicans yesterday have their share of doubts about whether we are up to the task of governing; about whether congressional Republicans have learned our lesson.
I harbor no such doubts.
For the past two years, House Republicans dedicated ourselves to developing alternative solutions grounded in the time-tested principles of fiscal responsibility and small-government. On the stimulus, instead of pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into non-stimulative government programs, we proposed to give private-sector job creators an incentive to hire by exempting small businesses from 20 percent of their tax liability.
On health care, instead of the government takeover known as ObamaCare, we provided solutions such as medical liability reform and allowing the purchase of health care coverage across state lines which would lower costs while enabling families and patients to keep the care they have if they choose.
To create real jobs, we offered a no cost jobs plan that would cut unemployment by, among other things, halting the deluge of President Obamas tax increases and approving negotiated free-trade agreements.
And on the budget, we challenged President Obama to freeze spending at 2008 levels, offered hundreds of billions of dollars in spending cuts, and enacted an earmark moratorium within the House Republican Conference.
Our efforts culminated with the release of the Pledge to America, in September.
Faced with an administration and a Pelosi-led Congress intent on reorienting the role of government in America, time and again we stood up against them. Now it is our responsibility to lead with the same conviction, vigor, and fight. Joined by our new Members, I know that we are ready for that challenge.
Having crisscrossed the country over the past year, I have consistently heard Republican candidates speak passionately about jobs and getting people back to work. They have inspired by articulating the case for constitutionally limited government that empowers individuals, families, local communities, entrepreneurs, and small business people. Our candidates have stood proudly for traditional values and have fought to ensure that we do not sacrifice our national security to political correctness or to a desire to win the approval of foreign elites.
We now have the opportunity to turn our words into action and produce real results. Like you, I am anxious to get started.
Most of us ran for Congress because we wanted to tackle the big problems facing our nation. We came to Washington to eliminate the deficit, to tear down barriers to job creation, and to reform a government that has grown out of touch with the governed.
I dont think any of us ran for Congress with the idea that we could finally provide a subsidy to this industry or that, or to this community or that. Or that we would vote to continue the same federal programs and agencies that are failing our citizens and bankrupting our children and grandchildren. And I know none of us ran with the idea that we should go to Washington to congratulate a collegiate basketball team for having a good season or feel obligated that we needed to do so even if we happened to be a fan.
Yet that is what we have been doing under the recent Democrat majority and even all too often under the previous Republican majority. Our problems have grown too immense to waste any more time. America stands at a crossroads, and the decisions we make at this very moment will determine the type of country that our children will live in.
That is why we will drain the swamp rather than learning to swim with the alligators. How?
We start by rethinking how time is spent and about the types of legislation that will be considered on the House floor. We start by identifying our top policy goals and committing to take concrete steps every single week to advance those goals. And we hold each other accountable with this simple question: are the actions of the House, our committees, and our Conference consistent with our principles and do they advance the nations priorities
We will not be able to roll back the leviathan overnight or balance the budget tomorrow or defeat terrorism once and for all next week, and people realize that. They understand how big the problems facing our country are, the obstacles that stand in our way, and the old, ingrained powers of Washington that will fight us every step of the way. Yet, people expect that we will fight each and every day to address these problems and make progress in every battle. We must not fall prey to the culture of Washington that exacerbates and creates problems. To put it simply, we must do the job we said we would do. Weve talked the talk, now it is time to walk the walk.
I know we are ready.
In the attached document, Delivering on Our Commitment: A Majority to Limit Government and Create Jobs, I outline some thoughts on how we can begin that effort. Included is a particular focus on a sustained effort on jobs, reducing government spending, putting in place a new standard for prioritizing legislation, and how we strengthen oversight.
In thinking about and preparing this plan, I found myself guided by one simple proposition which I believe will be instructive for our efforts over the next two years: Are my efforts addressing job creation and the economy; are they reducing spending; and are they shrinking the size of the Federal Government while increasing and protecting liberty? If not, why am I doing it? Why are WE doing it?
I would greatly appreciate any thoughts, feedback, or suggestions you may have. I know that by changing the culture and focusing on our priorities, ours will be a lasting and worthwhile legacy: that we will achieve what we said we came to accomplish, and in so doing, deliver on the type of conservative governance that has been promised.
Sincerely,
Eric Cantor
To: SeekAndFind
Cantor says he wants to do away with legislation recognizing individuals, groups, events and institutions.The idea that our lords can name facilities paid for with the taxpayer money after themselves is outrageous. If you have to put a name on it, choose a taxpayers name by lottery.
5
posted on
11/03/2010 12:18:30 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: kenavi
The governing document , which includes his plan referenced is
available here in PDF format.
To: SeekAndFind
I Thought it read 22-gage! LOL
7
posted on
11/03/2010 12:24:44 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: paul51
I don’t understand why he wants to do away with the “recognition legislation.” It’s a Congressional tradition, it costs *nothing* and it’s a wonderful way to pay honor to an American group that has succeeded in its endeavors.
This makes him sound like a grumpy Scrooge.
To: SeekAndFind
They ought to take this moment and pull all the true elected Conservatives and forge a new party. Time to really shake up the establishment.
Listening to Rove, McConnell, and Boehner it is clear that these guys just don’t get it.
9
posted on
11/03/2010 12:28:13 PM PDT
by
surfer
(To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
To: SeekAndFind
I’ve taken a glance of his 22 page document (an easy read), Here are some of the parts I like :
* PROHIBIT HIRING OF IRS AGENTS TO ENFORCE OBAMACARE ( SAVINGS: $15 BILLION ).
* REDUCE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT TO 2008 LEVELS ( SAVINGS: $30 BILLION ).
* TERMINATE TARP PROGRAM TO PROHIBIT ANY MORE BAILOUTS ( SAVINGS : $7 BILLION )
Something I find it hard to believe in that document :
“Over 2/3 of Republican Voters believe we can balance the budget without reducing spending on Social Security and Medicare.
To which I say -— SHOW ME THE MONEY !!
10
posted on
11/03/2010 12:29:43 PM PDT
by
WebFocus
To: SeekAndFind
11
posted on
11/03/2010 12:29:49 PM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
To: SeekAndFind
The ideas and the conviction are encouraging.
If Cantor cannot prevail on the positions he is proposing, he and people like Pence should seriously think of caucusing without the RINOS.
If the only way to do that would leave the RINOS as the “GOP majority” in the House, and THEY want to go ahead and prove - without Cantor and others - how much they are the lite Democrats, let them, and they will find the THEIR GOP is the “third” party in 2012.
12
posted on
11/03/2010 12:33:56 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: SeekAndFind
Lookie here on Page 7 of the Document....
PERMANENTLY PROHIBITING TAX PAYER FUNDING OF ABORTION !!
To: worst-case scenario
I like to see worthy groups and individuals recognized as well, but it can reach the point of frivolity. I wonder if maybe each member could be given a certain block of time per year (one hour?) for all such legislation. Then let each member choose how to allot his/her time. I'm sure everyone would agree to say, recognizing a military hero, but it gets kind of silly with all this "March is National Tomato Month in XYZ county and I'd like to pay tribute to the tomato growers...." There just isn't enough time for all this stuff.
Personally, I'd like to see some kind of reasonableness test applied to persons testifying before Congress also. I'm tired of seeing Ted Danson on the oceans, or Leonardo DiCaprio on global warming, or some actress of the moment who is suddenly an "expert" on a disease because she was in a movie about it.
To: surfer
They ought to take this moment and pull all the true elected Conservatives and forge a new party. Time to really shake up the establishment.The way to really "shake up the establishment" is to go through another election cycle and push the RINOs out with new, conservative Constitutionalists. Let the RINOs form their own party. We need to take control of the GOP and get it back on track.
15
posted on
11/03/2010 12:36:05 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
To: worst-case scenario
Because it's a waste of time. There are too many important things for Congress to be working on to be sidetracked by trivialities. I agree with Cantor 100% on this.
16
posted on
11/03/2010 12:37:08 PM PDT
by
vrwc1
To: surfer
Cantor is every bit the squish as the guys you mentioned.
17
posted on
11/03/2010 12:55:00 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: SeekAndFind
REPEAL THE GENOCIDE CALLED OBAMACARE!
Compromise is out.
To: worst-case scenario
it’s another ‘tradition’ that sticks. If you want to honor people, honor someone that actually gave something
19
posted on
11/03/2010 1:03:58 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: GraceCoolidge
435 members of congress each getting one hour a year for this equals a possible 435 hours of this polite waste of time. But who knows, maybe 435 hour limit is a real time saver compared to past sessions.
20
posted on
11/03/2010 1:08:20 PM PDT
by
Taffini
( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve and neither do I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson