[MichiganConservative]

I'm surprised they actually released this press released. I'm also surprised that an organization that I assume wants to be considered more seriously than an angry coed on a feminist rant uses the term "slut-shaming" in a press release.

I guess they had been so stupid-shamed all day in the blogosphere and Internet media, they decided to release this to make it stop.

[pnh102]

O’Donnell has bigger balls than Coons.

[hinckley buzzard]

Nice. Where did these sorry sluts run to and hide in 2008 when Palin was being harassed publically and privately for all to see?

[boatbums]

They’re a day late and a dollar short, but I guess it’s better than nothin’. About darn time!!!

[mmercier]

When I was a child, I used to go on WOMMANOTES on the DecNetNotes and harass the girls.

I am getting the creeps, thanks for the link.

[Grunthor]

# 24. Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women access to the mainstream of society.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Let me be honest: I look forward to seeing Christine O'Donnell defeated at the polls, but this kind of sexist attack is an affront to all women, and I won't stand for it.

Real women scare the hell out of the NAGs with the hairy armpits. That's why they endorsed the Marxist girly man. This is a load of crap.

[45semi]

After the 'whore' comment in Cali, and the 'bitch' comment by Behar, not to mention Greysons' 'K-street whore' which NOW ignored,
looks like NOW decided 'damage-control' was necessary.
Too little, too late, NOW...we know that your left-wing agenda/slant always comes before anything else...like, say, ALL womens issues.

[Blood of Tyrants]

NOW has repeatedly called out misogyny against women candidates

What a bunch of flat out liars. They haven't given a damned about Sharon Angle being called a whore or Christine O'Donnell being called a bitch.

[Redcitizen]

They sound silly.

[LeoWindhorse]

WOMEN LIBS ARE SUCH HYPOCRITES

[MarineBrat]

When they issue a fifty page apology to Sarah Palin I’ll reconsider their relevancy.

[paudio]

How about calling a woman who also happens to be a sitting senator from NY, a “hottest” senator? Does it fall into ‘reducing a woman candidate to sex object’?

[airborne]

Until they specifically support Republican women, it's all just window dressing.

Put your money where your mouths are, and take out ads defending Palin, O'Donnell and others.

Then I'll be impressed.

And while you're at it NOW, how about defending abused Muslim women?

[ROCKLOBSTER]

NOW to Media: Stop Reducing Women Candidates to Sex Objects

Yabut yabut, RAT Women Candidates are sex objects.

[Navy Patriot]

The National Organization for Ugly Women has lost so much credibility that no one will give ‘em the time of day. This ain't foolin’ anybody.

[SFConservative]

You can bet that NOW would not put out this kind of press release if O’Donnell was 3 points ahead instead of 16 behind.

[Libloather]

BITCH! (So I’ve heard.)

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the absolute FIRST TIME that NOW has said ANYTHING about the scurrilous attacks on any of Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, or Christine O’Donnell?

[Secret Agent Man]

To the writer of this piece: The muslims agree with you NAG gals. They demand you all put on full body burkas!

[Happy Rain]

NOW how the heck could THEY know what being regarded as a sex object is about?