Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaska Senate Candidate Joe Miller Endorses Federal Same-Sex 'Marriage' Ban
LifeSiteNews.com -- Your Life, Family, and Culture Outpost ^ | October 27, 2010 | By Peter J. Smith

Posted on 10/27/2010 6:27:31 PM PDT by topher

Wednesday October 27, 2010


Alaska Senate Candidate Joe Miller Endorses Federal Same-Sex 'Marriage' Ban

By Peter J. Smith

FAIRBANKS, Alaska, October 27, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Alaska GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller stated recently that he would support a U.S. constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, although he would prefer the matter left to the states.

Miller, a pro-life candidate running neck-and-neck with incumbent and write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski for U.S. Senator, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that he would support a constitutional amendment, if that were seen as the solution to the challenge of legal same-sex “marriage.”

Maddow, who is a self-identified lesbian, asked Miller about his position on gay rights and then specifically asked about his thoughts on a campaign employee who thought homosexuality could be treated or changed.

Addressing her first point, Miller emphasized that issues related to homosexuality “are really a state issue” and indicated they should be handled at a state, not federal level.

Miller said Terry Moffitt had worked with his primary campaign, but he had not seen the website HopeforHomosexuals.com and was unable to comment on it.

Maddow then asked if Miller agreed that homosexuality is a choice.

“I think that's up to the individual. The individual has to make that decision,” Miller replied.

When pressed by Madow as to whether he believed that a person has a choice whether or not to be gay, Miller brouhg the issue back to politics, saying that “My perspective is that at core, it is a state issue, but there are federal issues intertwined.”

He emphasized that policy changes regarding marriage should be kept close to the people at the state level.

Maddow then asked if he would vote for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex “marriage.”

"That's up to the people," Miller said, stressing that it would have to be a constitutional amendment. "If you get a three-quarters vote ratifying – I'd vote for it. I would."

Miller also told Maddow in the course of the interview that social issues are very close to his campaign and stated he is the “only unequivocal pro-life candidate in this race.”

The rest of the segment can be viewed here.

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/oct/10102707.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; ak2010; alaska; gaymarriageban; homosexual; homosexualagenda; joemiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: fortheDeclaration

Why? The name of the site looks like a conservative site.


21 posted on 10/28/2010 12:20:14 AM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: topher

Why in god’s name would Miller go on the Rachel Maddow show? It’s not as if he’s going to reach a conservative audience there and the libs who watch that show would never vote for him anyway. I’d say his inexperience is hurting him, but I can’t see Lisa Murkowski winning a write in campaign, she’d have to be the 1st person in 50 years to do so for the Senate.


22 posted on 10/28/2010 2:31:54 AM PDT by youthgonewild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youthgonewild
Murkowski was dealt a setback yesterday (Wednesday).

The Freerepublic thread:

Alaska Supreme Court issues stay on write-in list ban(Sen. Murkowski)

States that additionally information cannot be given out for write in candidates. This is major setback to Murkowski.

Murkowski is running neck-and-neck with Miller in the polls.

But then voters would have to fill in her name on ballots.

Laziness by voters might win the election.

The other thing is what if voters mispell her name on the ballot? Should it be thrown out?

Another hanging chad type question (Presidential Election 2000 was our hanging chad election...)

23 posted on 10/28/2010 2:43:09 AM PDT by topher (For handmade rosaries -- http://www.louisiana.edu/~cmh5722/rosaries4u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: topher

Why would Miller even agree to talk to the mad cow?


24 posted on 10/28/2010 4:36:34 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

Well then, it might be simple case of poor writing skills.


25 posted on 10/28/2010 5:13:56 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: topher

Good for Joe. I only wish he were more outspoken about his opposition to the imposition of the homo agenda.


26 posted on 10/28/2010 5:26:42 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
Stick to what works- Taxes, government spending, Obama care, freedom.

He was answering a direct question by a raving liberal dyke. What was he supposed to do? Lie?

27 posted on 10/28/2010 5:28:43 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
"I hear her closet is full of DVD’s of same sex escapades"

From personal experience I can vouch that nearly all liberals are sexual deviants. Some conservatives may also be as well, but it seems that deviancy is a right of passage on the left.

As someone else pointed out on FR yesterday, "a liberal cannot name a single 'freedom' that they support that does not elevate sexual deviancy. They are all about perverted sex."

28 posted on 10/28/2010 6:10:31 AM PDT by jboot (Let Christ be true and every man a liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jboot

Right on!

LLS


29 posted on 10/28/2010 7:15:30 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

What a queer way of putting it...


30 posted on 10/28/2010 8:16:05 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I was trying to convey how disgusting and psycho so many of them are, in one way or another.


31 posted on 10/28/2010 12:35:11 PM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson