Skip to comments.
Alaska judge blocks distribution of write-in names (Murkowski Setback)
Washington Post ^
| Wednesday, October 27, 2010; 1:40 PM
| DAN JOLING
Posted on 10/27/2010 11:50:15 AM PDT by Red Steel
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- An Alaska judge on Wednesday granted a temporary restraining order stopping the state elections officials from handing out names of write-in candidates at polling places.
The ruling is a setback for the campaign of incumbent U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who was defeated in the August GOP primary by tea party favorite Joe Miller and is mounting a write-in campaign. Former Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams is the Democrat in the race.
Anchorage Superior Court Judge Frank A. Pfiffner said the division was in clear violation of an administrative regulation.
The regulation reads, "Information regarding a write-in candidate may not be discussed, exhibited, or provided at the polling place, or within 200 feet of any entrance to the polling place."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: congress; election2010; joemiller; lisamurkowski; obama; palin; politics; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2010 11:50:17 AM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
Anchorage Superior Court Judge Frank A. Pfiffner said the division was in clear violation of an administrative regulation. The regulation reads, "Information regarding a write-in candidate may not be discussed, exhibited, or provided at the polling place, or within 200 feet of any entrance to the polling place." A judge who can understand plain English. How refreshing.
2
posted on
10/27/2010 11:51:58 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Red Steel
At least there is some judicial integrity in Alaska.
To: Red Steel
Appointed: October 29, 2009, by Governor Sean Parnell
4
posted on
10/27/2010 11:55:06 AM PDT
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: dirtboy
Wow!According to this ruling/regulation you cannot mention her name within 200 feet of the polling station. Gotta love it.
5
posted on
10/27/2010 11:56:13 AM PDT
by
rocksblues
(Obama, the biggest liar in the history of American politics!)
To: rocksblues
No mention of whether this can be appealed.
6
posted on
10/27/2010 11:57:04 AM PDT
by
mwl8787
To: Red Steel
I almost don’t care if Miller loses because of votes Murkowski siphens off...so long as that stupid whore loses.
7
posted on
10/27/2010 11:58:21 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
To: Red Steel
That’s why it’s a “WRITE-IN,” Lisa! You wanted this gig, so dance to the tune!
8
posted on
10/27/2010 11:58:37 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: rocksblues
Expect Murko to hire loudspeaker trucks, park them 201 feet away from polling places, and have them blare the spelling of her name.
Until the cops come by and shut them down for noise violations.
9
posted on
10/27/2010 11:58:37 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Red Steel
The Murkowski campaign had intervened in the lawsuit, arguing that election officials have a broad mandate to assist voters and the desire of voters in past court cases has trumped state rules. Doncha know that rules dont apply to Princess Lisa?
10
posted on
10/27/2010 11:59:10 AM PDT
by
freespirited
(This tagline dedicated to the memory of John Armor, a/k/a Congressman Billybob.)
To: dirtboy
My guess is that Murkowski will promptly appeal to the State Supreme Court, which is typically how the judiciary is constructed in many states. Hopefully, they’ll demure, but I doubt it.
11
posted on
10/27/2010 12:00:08 PM PDT
by
mwl8787
To: Red Steel
Somebody needs to put up the “Big Frown” picture of Princess Lisa ;^)
To: Red Steel
Of course you’re referring to this being a set-back for Linda Mobowski, right?
13
posted on
10/27/2010 12:01:48 PM PDT
by
ReleaseTheHounds
("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: mwl8787
My guess is that Murkowski will promptly appeal to the State Supreme Court, which is typically how the judiciary is constructed in many states. Hopefully, theyll demure, but I doubt it. This ain't New Jersey. It appears words still have meaning in Alaska, which, after all, takes the 'shall not be infringed' part of the 2nd Amendment seriously.
14
posted on
10/27/2010 12:02:09 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: mwl8787
According to Wiki, this is the current makeup of the Alaska Supreme Court:
Dana Fabe 1996 2010 Tony Knowles (Democrat)
Chief Justice: Walter Carpeneti 1998 2012 Tony Knowles (Democrat)
Morgan Christen 2009 2012 Sarah Palin (Republican)
Craig Stowers 2009 - Sean Parnell (Republican)
Daniel Winfree 2007 2012 Sarah Palin (Republican)
No Frank Murkowski appointees to be seen.
15
posted on
10/27/2010 12:05:01 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Red Steel
Anybody catch Rachel Maddow sucking up to the hag last night?
To: Red Steel
Poor Linda Merchowski ... this is bad for her
17
posted on
10/27/2010 12:06:33 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(All our candidates suck! The media SAYS SO!!)
To: All
18
posted on
10/27/2010 12:09:24 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: Red Steel
. . . "Shhhhhhhhh . . ."
19
posted on
10/27/2010 12:12:38 PM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(ARREST Barry Dunham Soetoro "Soebarkah" Barack Hussein Muhammad Obama for FRAUD!)
To: dirtboy
A judge who can understand plain English. How refreshing. Yes. I applaud Judge Pfiffner for his command of the English language.
Of course, on appeal, the appeals judge will find all sorts of shadows and penumbras in this straightforward sentence.
Why, some of the folks can't spell Murkowski, so the decision has already been made that variations on the name or, perhaps even just a pencil dot on indentation will probably be counted for the Sinator.
It will be obvious to the appeals judge that it's only fair to provide voters with the correct spelling of the name of the write-in candidate. /s
20
posted on
10/27/2010 12:13:08 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(American.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson