Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five myths about Sarah Palin
Washington Post ^ | Sunday, October 17, 2010 | Matthew Continetti

Posted on 10/15/2010 1:35:06 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan

Think you know Sarah Palin? The former Alaska governor has been in the spotlight ever since John McCain named her as his running mate on Aug. 29, 2008. Yet, while practically everybody has an opinion about Palin, not all of those opinions are grounded in reality. Many of them are based more on a "Saturday Night Live" caricature than on the living, breathing, 46-year-old mother of five. The real Sarah Palin is a complex woman who has risen in no time from obscurity to the stratosphere of American politics, fusing celebrity and populism in novel ways. Now that she's laying the foundation for a possible presidential run in 2012, it's worth taking a moment to separate the fact about Palin from the fable.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; conservativewomen; healthcare; mamagrizzlies; obama; palin; politics; sarahpalin; senate; wsarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2010 1:35:09 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

That is the jawline of a very beautiful, and determined, woman.


2 posted on 10/15/2010 1:40:07 PM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; ...
Yet, while practically everybody has an opinion about Palin, not all of those opinions are grounded in reality. Many of them are based more on a "Saturday Night Live" caricature than on the living, breathing, 46-year-old mother of five

Washington Post is only just learning this factoid 2 years later.

3 posted on 10/15/2010 1:45:52 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

No question about Sarah’s determination and good looks.

What I’m pleased to read is how good the article is. Realistic, sensible and even-handed are just three laurels I’d toss to the author. And it appears on the WashPost site. Maybe there’s hope for the MSM after all.


4 posted on 10/15/2010 1:45:52 PM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

I love that jawline! She was born to shelter this country from disaster.


5 posted on 10/15/2010 1:46:32 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

I’ve got to admit, I found that pretty fair and even-handed.


6 posted on 10/15/2010 1:48:37 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Many of them are based more on a “Saturday Night Live” caricature than on the living, breathing, 46-year-old mother of five.”

Just ask Jerry Ford what that can do to you...


7 posted on 10/15/2010 1:50:44 PM PDT by jessduntno (9/24/10, FBI raids home of appropriately named AAAN leader Hatem Abudayyeh, a friend of Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

Rut roh, WAPO starting to shine up Sarah. I wonder why? Its the WAPO, they will shine you just before they feed you a MACACA sandwich. Maybe this time, the pubbies should ignore WAPO and give interviews only to reputable and friendly media outlets. Maybe WAPO needs an intro into tomorrows movers and shakers. Who knows, I just find it suspicious that now WAPO wants to set the record straight on Sarah.


8 posted on 10/15/2010 1:50:55 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

Lefties going nuts in the comment section! LOL!


9 posted on 10/15/2010 1:51:03 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BelegStrongbow
"What I’m pleased to read is how good the article is. Realistic, sensible and even-handed are just three laurels I’d toss to the author. And it appears on the WashPost site. Maybe there’s hope for the MSM after all."

Yeah, I had to look twice to be sure that it was "really" the WP. I suspect that the end result will be that the reporter(s) who wrote it will be fired. After all, WP can't have any employees who don't stick to the accepted party line.

10 posted on 10/15/2010 1:51:34 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

Re: The Palin is unelectable myth.

Anytime I hear this, my only response is three words: Senator Al Franken. If that man can be elected, anyone can.


11 posted on 10/15/2010 1:55:59 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

“I suspect that the end result will be that the reporter(s) who wrote it will be fired. After all, WP can’t have any employees who don’t stick to the accepted party line.”

They may be realizing that Mr. Sparky is no comeback kid. That leaves only the Carter template for two years. Not fun reporting. Given the house will be in conservative hands, the news will be investigations and budget show downs. WAPO needs to position some reporters that pubbies can open up to. Otherwise, they got the great access to Nancy and Sparky, but no one will want to read about that.


12 posted on 10/15/2010 1:56:17 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Lefties going nuts in the comment section! LOL!

Boy, the comments in there make the weekly "DUmmie funnies" page here look almost rational. I haven't laughed so hard since reading the local letters to the editor last Sunday about who should be elected Senator of California in November!

13 posted on 10/15/2010 2:01:06 PM PDT by ssaftler (Don't vote for incumbent or recycled politicians, DRIP on them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

The author wasn’t a WaPo reporter, but Matthew Continetti, opinion editor of the Weekly Standard. Still, it’s pretty amazing that they printed it!


14 posted on 10/15/2010 2:06:23 PM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Yeah, I had to look twice to be sure that it was "really" the WP. I suspect that the end result will be that the reporter(s) who wrote it will be fired. After all, WP can't have any employees who don't stick to the accepted party line.

It's not a WaPo news story, but an opinion piece by a guy who writes for the Weekly Standard.
15 posted on 10/15/2010 2:07:46 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
Her critics were using Alaska's tough ethics laws to launch investigations into her behavior, sapping her finances and her energy.

With respect, it's interesting that whenever this reason/excuse for quitting gets brought up, it's never mentioned that she created/helped create those ethics laws which could be abused. Sooner or later, there will need to be some serious political analysis of her accomplishments, mistakes etc. by Conservatives...including, for example, her stance on man made global warming while Governor, support for a path to citizenship and apparent previous support of earmarks in Alaska such as the Gravina Island bridge. Heretofore, it's been taboo.

Some here will welcome the analysis, and others won't. Hopefully it won't get shouted down.

16 posted on 10/15/2010 2:10:07 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
At the moment, however, Palin still expresses her agenda mainly in negative terms, focusing on her opposition to Obama and the Washington establishment. She hasn't defined her "common-sense conservatism" in positive language.

Has he not listened to Palin speak? Sarah's speeches are very Reaganesque in its positive language. All in all, however, a pretty good article.

17 posted on 10/15/2010 2:14:26 PM PDT by upsdriver (The revolution begins on Nov. 2 to take back our country. The American people vs the ruling elite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
I posted this on digg yesterday. Feel free to digg it up.

http://digg.com/news/politics/five_myths_about_sarah_palin

18 posted on 10/15/2010 2:25:39 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

“They’re real and they’re spectacular!”


19 posted on 10/15/2010 2:50:26 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise; pissant
Washington Post is only just learning this factoid 2 years later.

Pissant hasn't learned it yet.

20 posted on 10/15/2010 2:52:38 PM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson