Skip to comments.
Homosexual Assault in the Military
Family Reserch Council ^
| Peter Sprigg
Posted on 10/15/2010 11:18:25 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
Homosexual Assault in the Military
Executive Summary
A Family Research Council analysis of publicly available documents-the Pentagon's own report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half-have shown that there is already a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the military. This problem can only become worse if the current law is repealed and homosexuals are openly welcomed (and even granted special protections) within the military, as homosexual activists are demanding.
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
Homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans are homosexual or bisexual.
FRC has reviewed the "case synopses" of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009). Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. This suggests that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers.
Lack of Privacy Leads to Sexual Assaults
FRC and other supporters of the current law have pointed out the risks involved in having servicemembers share living quarters, showers, and bathrooms with persons of the same sex who may be sexually attracted to them. This concern is borne out by many of the case synopses reported by the Pentagon. The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.
Many Discharges of Homosexuals are for Sexual Assault
Advocates of open homosexuality in the military often lament the fact that several thousand members of the military have been discharged under the 1993 law since its enactment. However, what they fail to note is that many of those discharges are actually for sexual assaults.
Court Records Reveal Shocking Cases of Homosexual Assault
Published decisions of military courts (available on the legal search engine Lexis) give even more detail about homosexual assaults in the military. For example:
- 36-year-old Marine Sgt. Sean D. Habian used both alcohol and homosexual pornography in the course of assaulting a 21-year-old Lance Corporal.
- Marine Sgt. Steven G. Carlson, a military police instructor, took advantage of his position to exploit his students, inviting them to social events, plying them with alcohol, and playing games like "truth or dare" to identify who might be receptive to homosexual activity. One of his victims "testified that the appellant's acts shocked him, he froze, and was scared."
- Homosexual activists are fond of saying that the military cannot afford to lose the specialized skills that some homosexual service members have-such as translators and linguists. Air Force Sgt. Eric P. Marcum was a Persian-Farsi linguist-but also was charged with forcible sodomy against a male Senior Airman who "testified that Appellant's actions made him scared, angry, and uncomfortable."
- Air Force Major Rickie J. Bellanger was charged with sexually abusing two minor boys-one of whom had begun corresponding with Maj. Bellanger when he was in the fifth grade.
Conclusion
The military already has a serious problem with sexual assault by homosexuals. If the current law against homosexuality in the military is overturned, the problem of same-sex sexual assault in the military is sure to increase.
- If the law is overturned and open homosexuals are welcomed into the military, the number of homosexuals in the armed forces can only increase-leading to a corresponding increase in same-sex sexual assaults.
- Removal of the threat of discharge from the military for homosexual conduct will reduce deterrence, likely leading to more cases of sexual assault.
- If homosexuals become a protected class within the military, victims will be afraid to report incidents of homosexual assault and commanders will be afraid to punish them, lest they be accused of "discrimination" or "homophobia."
Allowing open homosexuality in the military would do nothing to enhance the readiness or effectiveness of our armed forces. On the contrary, it would clearly damage them-in part because it would increase the already serious problem of homosexual assault in the military.
Download the full paper [PDF]
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; militay; obama; palin; rape; sexualassault; ussoldiers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Well I suppose the military will have to increase the budget for drapes and strange european food. And I guess the commisary will need some europop for the dance floor.
2
posted on
10/15/2010 11:20:36 AM PDT
by
utherdoul
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
“The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.”
There should be NO SURPISE about THIS.
Gay males are promiscuous. Someone sleeping is a sitting duck. WHY do you think soldiers were asking for RELIGIOUS OBJECTION to be housed with them? They do not want to be RAPED, HARRASSED or ATTACKED by these PERVERTS. All these perverts should be thrown out. ALL OF THEM.
I don't care how “honorably” they “serve”. Their negative behavior and how their perversion affects morale far outweighs any benefit of having a living breathing pervert there.
3
posted on
10/15/2010 11:22:35 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
“Lack of Privacy Leads to Sexual Assaults”
This is the real problem. Supporters of gays in the military have never shared their bedroom or shower with 55 other men. I have, and even with straight guys who practice good hygiene it’s tense.
4
posted on
10/15/2010 11:25:29 AM PDT
by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
To: nmh
“The first men dignosed with IDS reported an averge of one thousnd partners during their lives. Those who hve reserched the HIV-IDS epidemic have noted that some homosexul males actully hve five to ten sexul encounters in single night.” —Dr. Richrd Fittzgibbons
5
posted on
10/15/2010 11:27:00 AM PDT
by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
To: nmh
Throw all the queers out of the military with a dishonorable discharge and give them a bus ticket to S.F.
To: nmh
If we were dealing in reality,
these people couldn’t serve in the military
because of their psychiatric disorder.
7
posted on
10/15/2010 11:29:04 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Nazi roots: They perceived themselves not merely as masculine, but as a breed of men superior in masculine qualities even to heterosexuals. The Community of the Special (CS) asserted that male homosexuality was the foundation of all nation-states and that male homosexuals represented an elite strata of human society. The CS fashioned itself as a modern incarnation of the warrior cults of ancient Greece. Modeling themselves after the military heroes of Sparta, Thebes and Crete, the members of the CS were ultra-masculine, male-supremacist and pederastic (devoted to man/boy sex). Brand said in Der Eigene that he wanted men who “thirst for a revival of Greek times and Hellenic standards of beauty after centuries of Christian barbarism.”
8
posted on
10/15/2010 11:29:52 AM PDT
by
donna
(The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
To: donna
While Adolf Hitler is today recognized as the central figure of Nazism, he was a less important player when the Nazi machine was first assembled. Its first leader was Ernst Roehm. Homosexual historian Frank Rector writes that "Hitler was, to a substantial extent, Roehm's protegé" (Rector:80). Roehm had been a captain in the German army. Hitler had been a mere corporal. After World War I, Roehm was highly placed in the underground nationalist movement that plotted to overthrow the Weimar government and worked to subvert it through assassinations and terrorism. In The Order of the Death's Head, author Heinz Hohne writes that Roehm met Hitler at a meeting of a socialist terrorist group called the Iron Fist and "saw in Hitler the demagogue he required to mobilize mass support for his secret army" (Hohne:20). Roehm, who had joined the German Worker's Party before Hitler, worked with him to take over the fledgling organization. With Roehm's backing, Hitler became the first president of the party in 1921 (ibid.:21) and changed its name to the National Socialist German Worker's Party. Soon after, Rossbach's Storm Troopers, the SA, became its military arm. In his classic Nazi history, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, author William Shirer describes Roehm as "a stocky, bull-necked, piggish-eyed, scar- faced professional soldier...[and] like so many of the early Nazis, a homosexual" (Shirer:64). Rector writes:
Was not the most outstanding, most notorious, of all homosexuals the celebrated Nazi leader Ernst Ro[e]hm, the virile and manly chief of the SA, the du buddy of Adolf Hitler from the beginning of his political career? Hitler's rise had in fact depended upon Ro[e]hm and everyone knew it. Ro[e]hm's gay fun and games were certainly no secret; his amorous forays to gay bars and gay Turkish baths were riotous. Whatever anti-homosexual sentiments may have been expressed by straight Nazis were more than offset by the reality of highly visible, spectacular, gay-loving Ro[e]hm. If there were occasional ominous rumblings and grumblings about "all those queers" in the SA and Movement, and some anti-gay flare-ups, homosexual Nazis felt more-or-less secure in the lap of the Party. After all, the National Socialist Party member who wielded the greatest power aside from Hitler was Ro[e]hm (Rector:50f).
Betraying his roots in the "Butch" faction of the German "gay rights" movement, Roehm viewed homosexuality as the basis for a new society. Louis Snyder writes that Roehm "projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behavior pattern of high repute...he flaunted his homosexuality in public and insisted that his cronies do the same. What was needed, Roehm believed, was a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in his eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals" (Snyder:55). "The principle function of this army-like organization," writes historian Thomas Fuchs, "was beating up anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals" (Fuchs:48f).
The favorite meeting place of the SA was a "gay" bar in Munich called the Bratwurstglockl where Roehm kept a reserved table (Hohne:82). This was the same tavern where some of the earliest formative meetings of the Nazi Party had been held (Rector:69). At the Bratwurstglockl, Roehm and associates-Edmund Heines, Karl Ernst, Ernst's partner Captain Rohrbein, Captain Petersdorf, Count Ernst Helldorf and the rest-would meet to plan and strategize. These were the men who orchestrated the Nazi campaign of intimidation and terror. All of them were homosexual (Heiden:371).
Indeed, homosexuality was all that qualified many of these men for their positions in the SA. Heinrich Himmler would later complain of this: "Does it not constitute a danger to the Nazi movement if it can be said that Nazi leaders are chosen for sexual reasons?" (Gallo:57). Himmler was not so much opposed to homosexuality itself as to the fact that non- qualified people were given high rank based on their homosexual relations with Roehm and others. For example, SA Obergruppenfuhrer (Lieutenant General) Karl Ernst, a militant homosexual, had been a hotel doorman and a waiter before joining the SA. "Karl Ernst is not yet 35," writes Gallo, "he commands 250,000 men...he is simply a sadist, a common thug, transformed into a responsible official" (ibid.:50f).
This strange brand of nepotism was a hallmark of the SA. By 1933 the SA had grown far larger than the German army, yet the Vikingkorps (Officers' Corps) remained almost exclusively homosexual. "Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops," writes historian H.R. Knickerbocker, "had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs, men of rank of Gruppenfuhrer or Obergruppenfuhrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual he had no chance of advancement" (Knickerbocker:55).
Homosexuality in the Nazi Party
9
posted on
10/15/2010 11:35:13 AM PDT
by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
10
posted on
10/15/2010 11:36:08 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
To: nmh
I don't get it.
It is simple for me.
I don't like/agree with queers and they insist on trying to make me accept them.
That's a sure way to get seriously hurt ... I'm old and weakened ... I don't fight fair.
forewarned.
11
posted on
10/15/2010 11:40:24 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
If this ruling by yet another black-robed tyrant stands, we will have crossed a line which will lead to disaster for our nation. Whether that disaster comes from inside or outside our nation remains to be seen. But I've said for a long time that letting homos serve with impunity would be a trigger event, and I still believe that.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
12
posted on
10/15/2010 11:41:45 AM PDT
by
wku man
(Steel yourselves, patriots, and be ready. Won't be long now....)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature.Yeah, 8.2% that were REPORTED.
How many victims do you think decided to just keep quiet rather than admit they'd been raped by a queer?
If we'd just spend half the resources and energy to curing homosexuality that we do trying to convince people it's normal, we wouldn't have this problem at all.
13
posted on
10/15/2010 11:41:55 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: knarf
“I don’t get it.
It is simple for me.
I don’t like/agree with queers and they insist on trying to make me accept them.
That’s a sure way to get seriously hurt ... I’m old and weakened ... I don’t fight fair.
forewarned.”
No problem with that here!
I salute YOU!
14
posted on
10/15/2010 11:43:57 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Quite the eye opener. Thanks for the post
15
posted on
10/15/2010 11:44:06 AM PDT
by
fml
To: utherdoul
If this becomes the norm any GI who wants too should be allowed to walk away regardless of his enlistment/ re-enlistment agreements with no penalty.
16
posted on
10/15/2010 11:44:36 AM PDT
by
Waco
(From Seward to Sarah)
To: MrB
“If we were dealing in reality,
these people couldnt serve in the military
because of their psychiatric disorder.”
Exactly!
Now we have humanism mistaken for Christianity and more molestations than ever. It’s sick.
17
posted on
10/15/2010 11:45:15 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Will unless you model your military on the Spartans or the Sacred Band of Thebes, yes.
Maybe the answer is to form all Homosexual units.
18
posted on
10/15/2010 11:45:46 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: Kozak
Darn.
Will WELL unless you model your military on the Spartans or the Sacred Band of Thebes, yes. Maybe the answer is to form all Homosexual units.
19
posted on
10/15/2010 11:48:25 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: Kozak
Make no mistake, this radical left has no model for our military other than demoralizing it, weakening it, and just plain f**king it over.
20
posted on
10/15/2010 11:51:13 AM PDT
by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson