Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cynthia Tucker: Obama tried too hard to work with Republicans
AJC ^ | October 15, 2010 | Cynthia Tucker

Posted on 10/15/2010 5:11:32 AM PDT by maggief

WASHINGTON — Amplified by the right-wing message machine, Republicans paint President Obama as an unyielding left-winger, an unreconstructed liberal who refuses to compromise. The president’s critics have turned the truth inside out: One of Obama’s greatest political weaknesses has been his stubborn — and unrequited — love for bipartisanship.

The president has made some of his biggest mistakes trying to woo a GOP opposition that has committed itself to frustrating him at every turn. If he had ignored recalcitrant Republicans, for example, his health care legislation might have become law without months of damaging political drama.

In an interview last week in his West Wing office, David Axelrod, one of Obama’s closest advisers, acknowledged that the administration had been surprised by the unified Republican resistance to the president’s agenda.

“Well, I think we miscalculated,” Axelrod said. “We had the idea that, particularly in a time of national crisis, there would be more of an inclination to work together.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ajc.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bahgdadcynthia; cynthiatucker; hard; obama; republicans; tried; tucker; work
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: GoCards
Did we have a healthcare crisis?

Judging by this editorial, we had a mental health care crisis among journ-o-lists, and it's still going on.
21 posted on 10/15/2010 5:25:57 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Am I my half-brother's keeper?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I soiled myself and went to the AJC site to leave a commment:


Cynthia, we have a chief executive who has/had sky-high public support and unassailable majorities in both houses of congress, and yet YOU reach the conclusion that his efforts to compromise are among the chief root causes of his growing failures and inadequacies? Please. The man (and his team) are lousy leaders, executors and governors.

NET: If your party controls (with super majority) the Executive branch *and* the Legislative branch, you have a (very) sympathetic print and TV media, and your agenda fails the country and the economy, then YOU (as the President) *are* the problem, not your opponents. res ipsa loquitur


http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2010/10/15/obama-tried-too-hard-to-work-with-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-121642


Leaving a comment there is kinda what my neighbors’ dogs do to my front yard when their owners walk them by on a leash ;-)


22 posted on 10/15/2010 5:27:16 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

Tucker: The black Helen Thomas.


23 posted on 10/15/2010 5:27:23 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“Cynthia Tucker: Obama tried too hard to work with Republicans”

Just another RAT lie!!! With Bam there is no bi-partisanship, it’s “my way or the highway!”.


24 posted on 10/15/2010 5:27:23 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

This idiot is one of the primary reasons that the Atlanta Uninal & Constipation is in the throes of death today. People I know won’t put up with her garbage. Her constant beating of “it the white man’s fault” wears thin pretty darn quick. To say that she is a “race whore” would be a huge understatement.


25 posted on 10/15/2010 5:27:40 AM PDT by yellowhorse (6 good horses, 3 good women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Yeah. It must have been exhausting for Obama and the Dems to lock the GOP out of all those meetings where Obamacare and the Stimulus Bill were crafted.


26 posted on 10/15/2010 5:30:25 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
One could conceivably think that Tucker was in the "news" business, I mean being a newspaper columnists and all that, but she obviously only reads her own stuff, and nothing else.

The AJC has long been a democrat "newsletter", but the main reason I quit taking it, and I won't even buy it at the newsstand, is Cynthia Tucker. She's an all-out racist and cracker-hater. I hear that her dad was a cracker-hater too.

Tucker is a monochrome reporter - she sees only one thing in politics, and that is color. Every article is about color, every remark is about color. If obama was all-white, she'd be ripping him to pieces for breaking all those promises to his chia pet lefties.

Cynthia,the news is out there to repudiate your premise, but you have to actually READ it...you racist!
27 posted on 10/15/2010 5:30:32 AM PDT by FrankR (You are only obligated to obama to the extent you accept his handouts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Obama didn’t take every possible opportunity to pin the economic mess on his predecessor.

There's delusional, then there's Cynthia Tucker.

28 posted on 10/15/2010 5:31:03 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

Until Scott Brown was elected,
there was absolutely no NEED to
“work with Republicans” -
not that they actually tried.

There was NOTHING the republicans could do to stop ANY agenda item that he put forth.


29 posted on 10/15/2010 5:31:30 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Of course, it is not unusual for people in a general population to have differing opinions. In fact, it is expected.

However, when people develop opinions which not only fly in the face of the obvious but are a precise polar opposites of the facts, there is something deeply disturbing going on.

This is not just denial of the truth. Collective denial has a shelf life (with some important exceptions).

We jokingly call it "the Kool-ade"...but it is no joke.

We are looking at prime example of "collective insanity." This is very, very dangerous stuff! Very rare...and very lethal.

30 posted on 10/15/2010 5:31:51 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

“Shouldn’t there be an IQ minimum to be elected????”

Obviously, there isn’t one at the ajc.


31 posted on 10/15/2010 5:32:54 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I would say Obama works with his czars and that’s about it. How often do his Cabinet members meet with him?


32 posted on 10/15/2010 5:33:13 AM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yellowhorse

One of my fondest memories is when I called to cancel my subscription to the AJC. They of course offered a lower price special. I declined. They asked me why I was canceling. I gave them three reasons:
(1) They are unable/unwilling to separate editorial perspective from the news, particularly on the front page.
(2) They are unwilling to admit their bias and agenda.
(3) I was tired of Cynthia Tucker’s drivel making it into my home.

The Call Center rep had no response beyond “we’ll cancel your subscription.”


33 posted on 10/15/2010 5:33:30 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Delusional


34 posted on 10/15/2010 5:34:19 AM PDT by Jazz1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Cynthia, here are some facts you should aquaint yourself with:
1) When asked about his unwillingness to “work with Republicans”, Obama’s response was “We won.”.
2) Obamacare was written and passed without Republican participation.
3) The public has quit buying papers in which you write because you have no connection with reality.


35 posted on 10/15/2010 5:34:24 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
One of Obama’s greatest political weaknesses has been his stubborn — and unrequited — love for bipartisanship.


36 posted on 10/15/2010 5:36:03 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Today, Congress. Tomorrow, the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Looking at the quote from Axelrod, it looks the Dems strategy is in place for the next 2 years.

Two years? I don't think the Dem strategy is in place for the next two minutes. Axelrod is desperately flailing and grasping at straws. A couple of days ago, the problem with the world was "foreign money" infiltrating the Chamber of Commerce. Before that it was some rant on Fox News. Before that, it was that Christine O'Donnell is a witch. Before that, it was the evil puppet master John Boehner.
37 posted on 10/15/2010 5:37:28 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Am I my half-brother's keeper?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maggief

* Publisher - Michael Joseph, 404-526-5893, mjoseph@ajc.com
* Editor - Julia Wallace, 404-526-7679, jdwallace@ajc.com
* Senior Vice President, Circulation/Production/Technology - Bob Eickhoff, 404-526-5011, beickhoff@ajc.com
* Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer - Todd Cregar, 404-526-5125, tcregar@ajc.com
* Senior Vice President, Human Resources - Susan Davidson, 404-526-5377, sdavidson@ajc.com
* Senior Vice President, Sales - Moya Neville, 404-526-2009, moya.neville@ajcmediasolutions.com
* Vice President, Sr. Managing Editor - James Mallory, 404-526-5325, jmallory@ajc.com
* Vice President, Marketing - Amy Chown, 404-526-7214, achown@ajc.com


38 posted on 10/15/2010 5:39:28 AM PDT by mirkwood (Paul LePage for governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

I agree, the Democrats are totally lost. Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is not working for these guys at all. This bible of theirs is unraveling.


39 posted on 10/15/2010 5:40:34 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KEmom
"obviously, the author of the article is...or is she providing comic relief?"

Tucker is as socialist moonbat dim loony as they come. She actually beleives this nonsense and thinks you're stupid for not believing it too.

40 posted on 10/15/2010 5:40:47 AM PDT by libs_kma (THEY TALK ABOUT HIM LIKE A DOG BECAUSE HE TREATS THIS COUNTRY LIKE A FIRE HYDRANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson