Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jake Tapper Asks Axelrod About Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate
Monday, October 11, 2010 | Kristinn

Posted on 10/11/2010 5:38:46 PM PDT by kristinn

During the course of questioning about the Obama administration's attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, ABC News White House Correspondent Jake Tapper brought up the issue of Barack Obama refusing to release his long form Hawaii birth certificate in an interview today with senior White House adviser David Axelrod.

Axelrod said that Obama's birth certificate "has been available to people."

When Tapper followed up by asking if the long form version (aka the original with more information than the shorter publicly released version) has been released, Axelrod ducked the question with this bizarre rejoinder, “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”

Before people get too excited, Tapper later Tweeted his disdain for birthers:

jaketapper Periodically it becomes clear that I need to warn folks: I block birthers (and truthers). Keep that nonsense out of my twitter feed. Thanks. 11 minutes ago via ÜberTwitter

However, Tapper had no problem raising the issue with Axelrod:

TAPPER: But what do you say to people who argue you are demonizing an organization for a charge that nobody knows if it's true or not?

AXELROD: Well I’m not demonizing the Chamber of Commerce. I’m simply suggesting to them that they disclose the source of the $75 million that they are spending in campaigns and put to rest, put to rest the questions that have been, that have been raised.

TAPPER: Isn't that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?

AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.

TAPPER: The long form?

AXELROD: Someone once in the course of this debate about whether we should have a law to force these organizations to disclose where they’re money is coming from in the campaigns, someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.” If the Chamber doesn’t have anything to hide about these contributions, and I take them at their word that they don’t, then why not disclose? Why not let people see where their money is coming from?

Outside of the likes of Les Kinsolving, this appears to be the first time the long form birth certificate issue has been publicly queried at the senior White House level.

H/t Amanda Carpenter


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: axelrod; birthcertificate; certifigate; congress; davidaxelrod; eligibility; jaketapper; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; politics; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last
To: CynicalBear
There is no way Tapper would have broached that subject a year ago. He had to have been allowed by higher ups to ask that question. There is something much deeper going on with that question.


141 posted on 10/12/2010 2:13:31 PM PDT by Yaelle ( I donated double. We need FR running smoothly this fall. Join me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

Hmm Jake...

If you had to write a bio (or prove who Obama was without media sources, feet to ground like reporters of old), how would you do it? How many documents do you have that could be put in an Obama Presidential Museum?

Call all your friends across the press spectrum, ask them what they have or even what they have and haven’t checked on him; Is it documented?


142 posted on 10/12/2010 2:50:18 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
They're both on the same team.

We know Obama couldn't have gotten away with all he said about the Clintons (during the run), without their permission... and still breathe.

Tapper asked because they always go to the BC issue when he's in trouble. He's running out of folks to demonize.

I move for articles of impeachment; The first based on mental incapacity.

143 posted on 10/12/2010 4:17:28 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Reminds me of the people re: Radical Chic article in NY Mag by Tom Wolfe a while back.


144 posted on 10/12/2010 4:25:55 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

ping


145 posted on 10/12/2010 4:44:59 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Whether Jake Tapper is a moron or not is not the issue in this case. Think about it. There is no way Tapper would have broached that subject a year ago. He had to have been allowed by higher ups to ask that question. There is something much deeper going on with that question.

Correct, and the most telling part of the exchange is Tapper's response to the answer of his question.

"The long form?"

146 posted on 10/12/2010 4:57:20 PM PDT by houeto (Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; MeekOneGOP; ...

Ping................

There ya go, we were talking about this a couple of hours ago!!

Long form brought up!

Finger...dike...flood...wash out...drown...


147 posted on 10/12/2010 5:04:28 PM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Is it true that even Sean Hannity mentioned this today? Rush has been dropping hints for months but Hannity wouldn’t touch it - maybe Soros is tired of his puppet behaving badly and has removed his hand of protection. If anyone else in the MSM brings it up, the dam will (hopefully) break! My guess is that they’re waiting until after Nov. 2nd, just in case the Dems pull out a miracle and hold both houses. If not, I suspect that the info will come out fast and furious...


148 posted on 10/12/2010 5:04:51 PM PDT by VikingMom (I may not know what the future holds but I know who holds the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

Thanks a lot!

While we are at it, education records anybody?


149 posted on 10/12/2010 5:06:20 PM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: VikingMom

Not sure about Hannity but Rush dropped another hint today.


150 posted on 10/12/2010 5:09:10 PM PDT by houeto (Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

You know something about a federal indictment of Biden? Agnew didn’t just decide all of a sudden that he was tired of the job.

Sure, they may well trump up some reason for Biden to resign honorably, but there are constitutional issues to be considered.

The VP is elected by the citizens of the country, not an appointive office controlled by Barry0. Granted, Biden may have less influence than most of Obama’s minions, but he does NOT serve at the pleasure of the President.

If Biden goes, they’ll have to make it look like it’s his own choice, with a serious and compelling reason behind the resignation. He and Hillary can’t just switch jobs, as some have suggested.


151 posted on 10/12/2010 5:14:09 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Yep. Rush, Hannity, Tapper . . . all at once.

Something’s going on.


152 posted on 10/12/2010 5:22:46 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I'm here to tell you right now. Hillary will be VP early next year. The zero will be forced from office 3+ months later. Same story with Agnew, Nixon and Gerald Ford.

If Hillary becomes VP, I would be worried that the historical precedent will be more like how Johnson succeeded Kennedy. Obama just might come down with a bad case of Arkancide.

153 posted on 10/12/2010 5:24:54 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

The faster it cracks, the faster it will crack.


154 posted on 10/12/2010 5:42:08 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses
I honestly do think that Stanley Anne was the type who turned wild in her first semester of college, got herself knocked up by an already-married foreign exchange student, and never saw him again after that night, and especially not after he went home to take three other wives in Kenya. Being a good little liberal, Stanley Anne probably wanted to abort the baby but those were pre-Roe days so she became a single mother, and the long form proves it. But that would be an unwelcome admission for somebody who has built up his ENTIRE political career around the African racial identity of his father.

We know that she did see him again.

Abortions most certainly were available in pre-Roe days - just not legal in the US. Mexico was a popular destination for abortions at the time.

Usually an unmarried pregnant girl was sent away to "visit relatives", the baby put up for adoption, and the girl returned home with no one the wiser - everything was very secret.

Last, but not least was the shotgun wedding.

That's an advantage in being over the hill - you know how things were in the olden days.

155 posted on 10/12/2010 6:08:47 PM PDT by lucysmom (Trolling since 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

We’ve seen this happen before. Doesn’t take long before the engagement is over and another conspiracy is born.


156 posted on 10/12/2010 6:12:53 PM PDT by lucysmom (Trolling since 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The crack troops of truth will crack the crack-heads causing a crackling sound and that will crack me up!


157 posted on 10/12/2010 6:15:10 PM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
Jake Tapper Asks Axelrod About Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate

Rush rips into the topic nicely and often. Just WHO is this man in the White House? NOTHING, including his marriage license, seems to be available.

158 posted on 10/12/2010 6:43:56 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
Just WHO is this man in the White House?

Please, be respectful and refrain from calling him a man.

Thank you.

159 posted on 10/12/2010 6:47:28 PM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Carling

You Betcha! Hillary will use whatever she wants to keep BO from running again and the media will be hers! BO will probably be too ill to run again.


160 posted on 10/12/2010 7:46:37 PM PDT by seekthetruth (Allen West - US House FL 22 --- Marco Rubio - US Senate ---Scott/Carroll - Gov/Lt.Gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson