Posted on 10/05/2010 12:14:16 PM PDT by pinochet
This post is inspired by the tragic death of an 18 year old Rutgers University student, who committed suicide after his room mate secretly filmed him having sex with another man. Apparently, the student was so humiliated, that he felt he could not go on living. It is not known if the young man's family was aware of his sexual behavior. A link to the story: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20018574-504083.html
I do not support the liberal gay agenda. But heterosexual men need to start talking openly about difficult issues, which they never talk about with other men. There is no denying that heterosexual men are more insecure about their sexual orientation, than heterosexual women. If women notice that a certain woman happens to be beautiful, they have no problem talking about that woman's beauty. When women notice the beauty of other women, they talk about it openly, without having any concerns that someone will question their sexual orientation.
Men are of course open in admiring the beauty of women. But when a man notices that another man is very good-looking, he will not mention it openly, out of fear that other men will question his sexual orientation. It is hard for some men to openly state that a few men are better looking than many women, even if there is no sexual attraction involved.
That male macho culture, may have contributed to the climate that led the young man to take his own life. I think it is possible for heterosexual men to get in touch with their feminine side, without endorsing the liberal gay agenda.
There is no guarantee that the young man from Rutgers University would have remained gay for the rest of his life, if he had lived. In Britain, Oscar Wilde's teenage boyfriend, Alfred Douglas, married a woman later in life, and became a pro-family conservative Catholic in the 1920s. One of Britain's brightest pro-family conservative politicians in the early 1990s, Michael Portillo, was revealed to have had a gay relationship in college. In the 1990s, Portillo was the British Defence Secretary and was happily married to a woman, and he was in line to succeed John Major as Prime Minister. But gay militants in Britain used the revelations of his college sex life, to destroy his career.
“Exit Only”
That is so gay!
Not if there are any sheep around.
And lack of personal morality.
I’m a lumberjack, and I’m okay.
I sleep all night and I work all day.
...
Hey, I was born in the Carter years. I don’t know everything! :)
A gay friend of mine—who had been a practicing heterosexual for some years told me:
Men generally have a more rampant, indiscrimnate sex drive than females..they will do it pretty much with anybody, given the choice. They don’t necessarily complicate it with emotional bonding which most women ( whether they admit it or not) want.
With gay guys, you can have ‘no strings’ unattached sex with as many, as much as you want-they all want the ‘act’ too. Nobody necessarily gets their feelings hurt. Even when in a ‘committed’ relationship, lots of gay men have “open” recreational sex with other gays.
Amen to your post. Has everyone forgotten the whole Alan Alda genre of masculinity from way back in the 70s? For over thirty years we’ve seen men getting “in touch with their feminine side”. Males take longer to grow up now. The emasculated men in many of the films of the 70s make me want to puke. They even spoke in soft hesitant voices (at least when addressing “I Am Woman”) as if they were eunuchs.
“Move to where the food is”.
Haven’t thought of that song in years...
Doesn’t this very question belie the whole gay agenda thing of “it’s not our fault, we were born that way.” The question is ridiculous and the obvious answer is no. All men are not capable of exclusively engaging in sex with men.
Now, can a large number of men respond sexually to another man in the right circumstances? Perhaps. But we will never know because the huge majority of men choose to not put themselves in such circumstances. And we must not forget the cultural aspect. In some Hispanic cultures and middle eastern cultures only catchers, not pitchers, are considered to be homosexual.
I discovered the real thing at an early age and can’t imagine anything else.
>>>>Practicing homosexuals are either people suffering from a genetic defect, or so-called “normal” people (really individuals of weak wills and genetically deviant tendencies) who have acquired a particularly vicious vice due to influence from genetic homosexuals
Pro-family activists who fight against the gay agenda, operate on the assumption that gay rights propaganda can be so effective, that even normal male kids can be misled. This is why they fight against gay adoptions.
There have also been stories of normal and well adjusted teenage boys from good families, being seduced by gay pedophiles. Many in the pro-family movement assume that all male children, even those who are mentally healthy and well adjusted, can be seduced by smooth-talking gay pedophiles. This is why the pro-family movement tries to fight the gay agenda on all fronts.
I still use that line. LOL
We have a penis, so technically yes. That is why a penis doesn’t make a man, no matter how much the PC pukes will tell you that. A man has morals and won’t partake in that kind of depravity.
It's hard to post about Sam for obvious reasons. What do you figure. Is Malika about 350 now?
Most of the civilian males I encounter (and I encounter hundreds at work every day) are Beta males. It depresses me quite a bit but then I work and live near "The Crossroads of the Marine Corps" and those young fighting men are a constant reminder to me that there is a counter to the wimps deliberately being created by our public schools and the media. They are just concentrating in the Military where there are other real men like them.
I’ve seen at least as many females who seem to be in touch with their masculine side. Gender roles are all screwed up for a lot of folks.
People are capable of all things when restraints are lifted and that goes for having sex with the same gender, pedophilia, bestiality, cheating, drugs, theft, murder, destruction, vandalism, terrorism... anything!
It is just that most people have governor’s on their characters, minds, and inclinations whether naturally in their psyches and souls or inculcated by ciilization.
Because I mention I’d like to kill the cell phone texting idiot who caused a chain reaction accident doesn’t mean I’d do it.
Because I find some women absolutely gorgeous doesn’t mean I view them as vehicles for lust.
The homosexual community needs to believe that everyone thinks like them when, in truth, the majority of people in the world do not.
And that’s a good thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.