Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Middle Class to Suffer Most From Bank Rules: Whitney
CNBC ^ | 10/05/2010 | Jeff Cox

Posted on 10/05/2010 7:03:22 AM PDT by Rational Thought

As new regulations push banks toward safer investments and lending practices, the middle class will suffer the most, banking analyst Meredith Whitney told CNBC.

The 26 percent of mostly low-income Americans who don't have bank accounts—as well as the wealthy—are only marginally affected by tighter credit from more stringent banking regulations, Whitney said.

But those in the middle class who have relied on access to credit will suffer as banks that "can't price risk now" become increasingly afraid to make loans.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: banks; credit; economy; loans; meredithwhitney
Whitney on the mark.

This is one of the major reasons the economy cannot recover.

1 posted on 10/05/2010 7:03:25 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Don’t Marxists want to destroy the middle class? Isn’t the middle class the borgoise that stands in the way of worker revolution? Don’t they want two classes? Rulers and peons?


2 posted on 10/05/2010 7:06:29 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

The marxist agenda demands that the Glorious Revolution starve out the pesky Bourgeoisie.


3 posted on 10/05/2010 7:11:39 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Credit for everyday things is a relatively new concept.

I grew up in the 1950s and 1960s. My family did not have credit as we think of it today. Credit was for big items such as a car or a house, not everyday items.

You had three choices back then, lay-a-way, cash, or do with out.

Any credit you might have was from friends or relatives and the amount was small, and the terms very short, pay back next pay day or you will never get another loan.

One exception was the local grocer would on occassions allow known good customers to carry a balance but only until the next pay day.

This may seem harsh, but in truth it was the best thing going. No one had the opportunity to get themselves too far into debt and ruin their life.

I was in my mid 20s before I got my first credit card. It was for emergencies only (but you would be surprised how many emergencies occured when money was easy).

Because I had not been taught how to use money I soon got myself into trouble with credit. By the time I was 30 I was in (what I consider deep debt) for around $30,000 and nothing to show for it. It took me several years to clean that mess up (and happy to report I did and have been responsible with credit every since).

Credit by itself is not a bad thing but it can be abused with bad results for everyone (even those that do not use credit as prices have to rise to cover the loss when people do not pay their bills).

So it is a good thing that credit is being tighten up a little. I do not know if we will ever return to the day credit is not used, but my advise to a young person, pay cash or do without.


4 posted on 10/05/2010 7:16:12 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Title should read: Middle Class whiteys suffer the most through Obama/CRA/ACORN mortgage scam aka reparations.

This whole mortgage thing is about to get a lot worse.


5 posted on 10/05/2010 7:19:38 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Middle Class to Suffer Most From Bank Rules

The hell you say.

Obviously what we need here is new legislation! Aimed at protecting The Middle Class from these eeeeevil banks who pass these new draconian bank rules on to their customers.

Evil bankers! Stop passing legislation on to your customers!

Somebody ping Conress! There ought to be a law!

/end rant

6 posted on 10/05/2010 7:33:53 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Populist demogoguery which demonizes the rich hurts the poor and middle classes more than the rich.

When credit stops flowing from the top (trickle down as it's called) the weakest suffer.

I've seen quite a bit of this type of anti-capital sentiment here on FR as well and I don't like it at all.

7 posted on 10/05/2010 7:50:44 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

8 posted on 10/05/2010 7:57:11 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

exactly. I was out of work and fell behind on my second mortage. I get a letter that states under the new Obama laws I may be able to restructure the loan. But NOOOO!! I make too much money!! Evidently not enough money to pay my loan but too much to qualify for a hardship WTF.


9 posted on 10/05/2010 8:00:00 AM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
I think I get your point. But, the reason for little available credit to the Middle class IS a result of NEW Government intervention and Government guidelines (basically a Government take over).

If our economic system would have been left alone, it would have recovered by itself. That's one of the beauties of Capitalism.

This time around, a severe recession has been amplified and pushed to the brink by Government.

Some may think banks are evil. I don't argue that point (in many circumstances). But, as evil as banks may be perceived, Government (in this case) is the real evil.

10 posted on 10/05/2010 8:33:57 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Credit for everyday things is a relatively new concept.

I agree with you...

But, we have a business level built on easy money and lax credit. If we limit it now (and I agree, we should) it's going to cause a long-term slow down in business as we all deleverage.

I've been very pleased to see that my son, who just graduated with a Finance degree, abhors the idea of going into debt. He has NONE now... and,he doesn't want it. He saved money to buy a computer... now, he's saving money to buy a car. Wish I had done that when I first got out.

11 posted on 10/05/2010 8:53:24 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Whitney on the mark.

When Whitney speaks... I listen.

12 posted on 10/05/2010 8:54:12 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

If you have ever been real sick, you know the road to recovery is long and painful, but the alternative is a lot worse.


13 posted on 10/05/2010 9:22:32 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

I personally think you’re right. I have ot wonder, how many people who are considered ‘wealthy,’ are actually such with cash in the bank or living on credit, keeping up appearances. Credit should only be availabe in small amounts and you should have to prove that you have at least half of what you want to spend in the bank. Unless it’s for emergency medical expenses.

I acutally thought that a percentage of your paycheck should be deducted to go towards paying for loans and any credit debt.


14 posted on 10/05/2010 9:24:28 AM PDT by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought; what's up
If our economic system would have been left alone, it would have recovered by itself. That's one of the beauties of Capitalism.

This time around, a severe recession has been amplified and pushed to the brink by Government.

Some may think banks are evil. I don't argue that point (in many circumstances). But, as evil as banks may be perceived, Government (in this case) is the real evil.


As I see the problem, it's that we have been moving toward corporatism / fascism for a good time now. An unholy alliance has developed between large global 'too big to fail' banks (and corporations) and government.

The 'too big to fail' are all to glad to lend their expertise and input, writing the new financial (and other) regulations to their own benefit and to the detriment of competition. Smaller American banks, companies, and workers are stuck picking up the tab.

Much complaining about evil capitalism and evil banks is in reality about the effects of corporatism; far too many politicians of both parties have long been bought and paid for.
15 posted on 10/05/2010 12:32:37 PM PDT by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson