Most of the people who voted Obamacare will be re-elected this Nov.
Have a nice day.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308266/posts
#
Stepping back in time...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308266/posts?page=3#3
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE
“Obama on single payer health insurance”
Video Description - quote:
6y2o12la | June 29, 2008
Obama on single payer health insurance
Category:
News & Politics
Tags:
Obama AFL-CIO Single Payer Health Care Insurance Policy News
That Arnold, he's a REAL fiscal conservative!
See tag line.
No one will want to offer insurance with these rules.
ping
“The architect of Obamacare, Sen. Harry Reid (D.-ev.), tired of being hammered by challenger Sharron Angle on Nevada’s worst in the nation unemployment, has gone on the attack defending Obamacare.”
Oh...that’s going to work out well. /s
“Sharron Angle continues to point out that Obamacare will force everyone to pay for coverage they may not need because the federal government will dictate through the political process what coverage is required in every policy. You may not want a transgender operation, but you’re covered for it and will pay for it anyway.”
This is the redistribution of wealth/health care that they were able to sell to a the dumb cultists/small minority of the country. It stinks...
“The Reid/Sebelius retort was to present 5 year-old Brennan, an autism patient, whose father (an admitted Reid supporter) claimed he could not get insurance coverage for the expensive autism treatment.”
Of course they will determine if a mere child gets the help they need according to the costs involved, and that child’s “benefit” to society. This is exactly what Sarah Palin addressed in her reference to Trig’s needs having to go to the bureaucracy for help.
Death panels are in the legislation...
The whole purpose of an insurance policy is to protect the policy holder against the risk of facing enormous costs related to catastrophic events. The whole concept is based on the expectation that the "catastrophic event" in question for any given insurance policy (major damage to a home, an auto accident, the death of the insured, etc.) will happen infrequently. For property/casualty insurance, a policy holder can go an entire lifetime without ever filing a claim -- and most people are perfectly happy with that.
Once you get to the point where an insurance policy is used as nothing more than a financial mechanism to pay for things that occur on a regular basis, then it isn't "insurance" anymore -- it's just a financial tool to pass off the costs of the products or services in question (a new home for flood "insurance," regular health-related expenses for medical "insurance," etc.) onto someone else.
Mitt will fix it, like he did the Utah hack Olympics, or proposed for Detoilet. He’ll get a federal bailout. ( See, free money. It’s fix? You don’t have to go to Harvard Business school. )
Not if we can repeal Obamacare!