Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin to team up with Steele at RNC rallies
CNN ^ | 9/30/10 | Pete Hamby

Posted on 10/02/2010 3:19:31 PM PDT by pissant

Edited on 10/03/2010 5:50:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Washington (CNN)

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: cultofpalin; elections; iquitarod; keywordabuse; michaelsteele; palin; palin4amnesty; palin4herself; palin4mccain; palin4obama; palin4palin; palin4steele; palinistaexcuses; palinkoolaidfactory; palinlovesrinos; palinproamnesty; pissant; pissant4obama; pissant4rinos; pissanttrollsagain; rinopalin; rinos; rnc; saintsarahofwasilla; sarahmcpalin; sarahpalin; steele; stfualready; vichy; vichyrinos; vichyssoise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-247 next last
To: tirednvirginia

Ronald Reagan would be up there with Michael Steele in a spirit of unity if he were still with us.

That being said, I will still focus my financial support on conservative candidates and not send money through the RNC system.

I’ll let the RNC take care of the moderates with their money while I help take care of the conservatives.


181 posted on 10/03/2010 9:06:25 PM PDT by Nextrush (Slocialist Republicans and Socialist Democrats need to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I didn’t need to hear this.


182 posted on 10/03/2010 9:30:03 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Ummm, hasn’t the strategy always been to take over the RNC by Conservatives? How can she orchestrate that takeover if she is outside? Sarah has never claimed to be anything except a Republican. I hope she takes over the RNC as Chairwoman, she basically is acting Chairwoman already.


183 posted on 10/03/2010 9:30:29 PM PDT by buschbaby (Beware! Momma Bear on the prowl. Grrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; GLDNGUN
You’re wasting your breath, spanky. When push comes to shove, the conservatives are going to demand a man of substance and wisdom breadth.

Who's your candidate?

184 posted on 10/03/2010 9:45:47 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I’ve got about 6 or 8 I’d heartily support.


185 posted on 10/03/2010 9:49:34 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: pissant; onyx; McGruff
Go Sarah!


186 posted on 10/03/2010 9:54:14 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

LOL!


187 posted on 10/03/2010 9:55:11 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: buschbaby

Bump to the top!


188 posted on 10/03/2010 9:56:24 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

“Entering the The New Majority territory. “

Good catch. Some of us know what that means.


189 posted on 10/03/2010 10:04:05 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Sure.

She's building an organization in addition to her grassroots efforts.

First, develop the base.

Next, get ahold of the machinery.

Then, mow your opposition down...effortlessly.

This woman knows exactly what she is doing, and if for some unfathomable reason she chooses not to run in ‘12, she'll be in a position to make damn sure whoever does will need her stamp of approval, more than anything.

King-making at it's finest!

(But I still think she will run, and be the nominee.)

CA....

190 posted on 10/03/2010 10:08:29 PM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! Seems I've found that silly grin again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Good post.


191 posted on 10/03/2010 10:20:20 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

That’s a good point, counterpunch. We need a candidate that conservatives like Peggy Noonan will approve of.

/s


192 posted on 10/03/2010 10:37:47 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Who's your candidate?

pissypants is a Hunter drone, but since he's slowly realizing that Hunter will never be President, he's moved down to about #3 on his list. Last I knew, DeMint was #1 on his list. Jim DeMint is a great conservative; however, he's made some mistakes. He fully supported Lindsey Grahamnesty. He endorsed Myth Romney in 2008, and backed RomneyCare in Massachusetts. Pissypants' problem is that if any of those sins had been committed by Sarah Palin, they would be mortal wounds that resign her to RINO status. If Hunter endorses Huckabee, it's a momentary lack of judgment, but he's right back in the saddle, flogging away for Hunter. If DeMint endorses Romney and Graham, same story. But God forbid that Palin endorse McCain, the guy who nearly made her VPOTUS. For THAT she's a RINO, through and through.

But, hey, if it weren't for double standards, pissypants wouldn't have any standards at all.
193 posted on 10/03/2010 10:39:34 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: pissant
When push comes to shove, the conservatives are going to demand a man of substance and wisdom breadth.

Pissant has issues.

194 posted on 10/03/2010 10:41:23 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Your GOP back then controlled the house, the Senate, and the presidency. They changed alright-For the worse. And because of it they lost all Three. It could not be any clearer than that...You are wrong. The only way to bring about change is to force it to change at the ballot box, and not vote for Rino’s.


195 posted on 10/03/2010 11:01:43 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

0bama won an unprecedented 20% of conservatives.
And that was WITH Palin running against him.
Those are just the facts.
I don’t know how you turn that into an argument that Palin is the great white hope.

The problem with Palin’s followers, as with any cult, is they mistake their own intensity for widespread appeal.


196 posted on 10/03/2010 11:03:59 PM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Agree.......she gets my support till she proves she’s not worth it. She is a fox in more ways than one IMO.


197 posted on 10/03/2010 11:09:06 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
0bama won an unprecedented 20% of conservatives.

Newsflash: Peggy Noonan isn't a conservative. Neither are Colon Powell, David Frum, Kathleen Parker, and all of the other frauds that supported Obama. No conservative in their right mind would vote for a leftist like Obama.

The problem with Palin’s followers, as with any cult, is they mistake their own intensity for widespread appeal.

Supporting Palin does not a cultist make. You sound like a leftist with your kooky accusations. And by widespread appeal, I assume you mean someone who is acceptable to liberal frauds like Peggy Noonan. If not, name another potential candidate with more widespread appeal than Palin.

198 posted on 10/03/2010 11:36:39 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

I’m not sure why you are latching on to Peggy Noonan here.
I’m talking about what the 2008 exit polls revealed.


199 posted on 10/03/2010 11:59:37 PM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

A brief search shows I probably spoke too soon, though I haven’t finished searching yet.

If I was wrong I apologize. It must have been another issue I remember debating with you.


200 posted on 10/04/2010 4:40:04 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson