Posted on 09/24/2010 9:43:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., seems to believe that her ethnicity entitles her to keep her congressional seat this election. In a Spanish language interview on Univision, the seven-term representative from California's 47th Congressional District accused "los Vietnamese y los Republicanos" of trying to take away a seat she says belongs to the Hispanic community, and therefore her.
Sanchez's Republican opponent this year is a state assemblyman, Van Tran, who came to the United States at the age of 10 from his native Vietnam just days before the fall of Saigon.
Sanchez's comments were highly offensive. But they reflect a reality that is little discussed these days, namely racial gerrymandering, which has been supported by both Democrats and Republicans for decades.
The 47th District spans across a populous area in California's Orange County, including the cities of Garden Grove and Santa Ana as well as parts of Fullerton and Anaheim. Orange County was once synonymous with wealth and conservatism. But the county has changed in recent years largely because of the influx of working- and middle-class Hispanics and Asians, many of them immigrants and small-businessmen and women. The changing demographics have also made this district less easy to pigeonhole.
Congressional districts are redrawn every 10 years in order to reflect population changes in the latest decennial census. In most states, the legislature redraws the lines, and the party that controls the legislature often draws those lines to try to ensure its members stay in power. But amendments to the Voting Rights Act have played a large role in how the lines have been drawn since 1982. Unfortunately, the act has been interpreted by the courts to favor drawing legislative districts so that minority candidates have a good chance of being elected, creating so-called "safe" minority seats.
Sanchez was first elected in 1996, defeating long-term incumbent Republican Bob Dornan in what was then the 46th Congressional District. The election was controversial because Dornan asserted that Sanchez won her narrow victory, by 979 votes, because some non-citizens voted. After a lengthy congressional investigation, Sanchez was allowed to take her seat when investigators found only 748 tainted votes, not enough to change the results. When it came time to redraw district boundaries, the Democratic-controlled state Legislature packed in more minority voters to create a "safe" seat for Sanchez.
But Democrats have not been entirely to blame for this nonsense. The GOP, especially at the national level, has been quite content to see such districts drawn up, so long as these safe minority seats also meant that surrounding districts were whiter -- and therefore, presumably, more Republican. However, what Republicans may not have counted on in supporting racial gerrymandering is that as members of minority groups move up the economic ladder, they are more likely to vote Republican.
The 47th District shouldn't be a Hispanic or a Vietnamese seat. This election should not be fought on the basis of which ethnic group is entitled to representation in the halls of Congress -- and to his credit, Tran is not running as an ethnic candidate but as a conservative. Ironically, Sanchez has managed to hold onto her seat for 14 years because she eschewed easy categorization as knee-jerk liberal and ethnic politician.
There's probably a good reason why she chose to make her racial pandering remarks on Spanish-language television. No doubt, she was hoping only certain voters would hear them. But in the age of YouTube and ubiquitous blogs, her remarks have quickly reached a wider audience than she intended. And they could cost her the election in this year's tight race, even if the mainstream media give her comments a pass.
The only way to stop racial and ethnic appeals of this sort, however, is to remove the incentive by eliminating racial gerrymandering. Maybe the next time the Voting Rights Act comes up for extension, Republican members of Congress will be more amenable to eliminating guarantees of safe seats on the basis of skin color.
Racist b*tch.
If she loses her seat she might have to find a real job.
Amazing,a democrat can say anything without repercussions!
We here in Texas had a turd representative that thought the same thing (Martin Frost)... he *issed and moaned when congressional districts were re-drawn to accurately reflect the area's population patern. It was good to see Frost's paste-eating "smile" turn to a frown when Pete Sessions defeated him years ago.
I am for using a computer to randomly redraw districts every 4 years.
That's her. She "won" by 973 votes.
She is one useless pile of crap!.....
Much better
I always like to think positive
MexiBigots are well known in California for their ethnic and race hatred....ask a black guy from Compton if he's welcome in Echo Park.
She knew what she was saying. To Mexicans, "immigrant" means "Mexican." They have no respect and no regard for any other nationality or race. "La Raza"...it's almost Hitlerian.
Compare the 47th to the 38th, 39th, 40th and 46th.
The Republicans caved in on gerrymandering in this state years ago to salvage a few "safe" districts like Rohrbachers 46th (Palos Verdes to Dana Point).
More districts should be drawn like the 47th.
Before any one attacks me, have the courtesy to look at the maps and see what I am referring to.
-- snip --
Sanchez was first elected in 1996, defeating long-term incumbent Republican Bob Dornan in what was then the 46th Congressional District. The election was controversial because Dornan asserted that Sanchez won her narrow victory, by 979 votes, because some non-citizens voted. After a lengthy congressional investigation, Sanchez was allowed to take her seat when investigators found only 748 tainted votes, not enough to change the results. When it came time to redraw district boundaries, the Democratic-controlled state Legislature packed in more minority voters to create a "safe" seat for Sanchez.
If this isn't stealing an election, then I don't know what is
Districts apportioned by the census shall be defined in such a manner as to divide the registered voters into districts equally (+/-1 person) while the total perimeter of the shapes o the districts is the minimum possible to achieve this division.The district boundaries would be defined by math, not politics.
I’m all for soap bubbles.
Draw them around the location of the voting places and let the chips fall where they may.
ALL ‘precincts’ should have a circular shape to them.
Her ignorance is amazing, but then that is nothing new and no surprise at all
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The problem is not just with the illegals. Even a lot (though not necessarily all) of Mexicans "with papers" continue to cling to the culture of corruption that characterizes Mexico, the sewer of North America.
That low-life Ted Kennedy promised that NONE of these problems would ever occur when he championed that vile "Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965", stating:
...our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, the act will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.