Yes, it is true. Posted on 09/23/2010 1:29:27 PM PDT by unspun
Yes, it is true.
You may read this September, 2010 report, courtesy of our Freedom of Information Act, at cia.gov.
Since the bulk of what this report discusses apparently has to do with international cooperation, why then, did they not choose that apparently appropriate phrase, instead of "Global Governance"?
"Global Governance" - in case you need to recheck your eyes and mind.
Here is an interesting and self-conflicted disclaimer, from its "Introduction," page 1:
The term “global governance” as used in this paper includes all the institutions, regimes, processes, partnerships, and networks that contribute to collective action and problem solving at the international level. This definition subsumes formal and informal arrangements as well as the role of nonstate actors in transnational settings. Regional cooperation may also be regarded as an element of global governance insofar as it contributes to broader efforts. Governance differs from government, which implies sovereign prerogatives and hierarchical authority. Global governance does not equate to world government, which would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever.Are you saying, under your breath, "'Governance differs from government.... Global governance does not equate to world government....' Who are they trying to kid?"
How can any set of people practice governance when there is no effort of government in effect? Clearly, they wish to establish dependable, and enforceable arrangements, coordinated and administered between nations, hence their admission to the word "governance," even though they create the distinction without a difference, between that word and "government."
It is a natural and logical fact that if "global governance" is coordinated effectively, it must be done through an coordinating entity of some kind. But, we must not call that body any kind of "government" -- is what they are saying.
And what is any difference again between the nouns-turned-adjectives, used in these terms? How exactly does "globe" differ from "world," o United States’ National Intelligence Council (NIC) and European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)? What color is the sky in your world, er, globe?
So, reader, is there a beacon flashing in your mind, "Orwellian. Orwellian. Orwellian...?" The term "global governance" may also be though of as an Hegelian (and Marxist) compromise, between thesis: international cooperation and antithesis: world government. For those that would like a summary of Hegelian philosophy and it's implications for Karl Marx, it is a way of establishing revolution, plus a way of observing reality, then arguing impossibility, and then influencing people to believe they can "progress" by a gradual step toward the unreal and impossible.
A bias for "world government" is apparent in this conflicted pseudodisclaimer, or they would not have admitted (as if forlornly kicking the dust with one shoe, hands in pockets) that "world government... would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever."
Your Sovereign expenditure of tax dollars at work, Sovereign Americans.
Exactly what entities orchestrated this? Only the present US administration and that of the EU (which, by the way, are called "governments")? The major CFR, Bilder, Trilateralist, mega-financier, Marxist, fascist, and globalist movers and shakers down? All, likely, of the above? (Much of that list is redundant.) Any others?
And, if this is what is published, what associated intentions, plans, and implications are they holding back, as objectives for their (our) 2025 benchmark/deadline?
More to be published about this -- including more excerpts -- added to this Gulag Bound article, after further research.
h/t @PatriotWatchdog
Above document also called “Global Trends 2025:
A Transformed World”
Warning. It’s long.
bttt
ping
ping
“where the borders between nations are blurred.”
Gee. Where could one of those be?
Great! (gulp) More homework! I will share this with a speedreading friend or two, before finishing.
Thank... y-y-o-u, very much.
Defeatist.
Waving the white flag while wetting your pants is not the way to win wars.
Thanks for the ping!
Who was Sarah Palin before 2008, and WHY WAS SHE CHOSEN?
IS SHE the real deal, or just "bait"?
I don't know. But its something I've recently thought of.
Friend, you've obviously got a LOT of catching up to do.
For starters, Sarah Palin is the former Governor of Alaska, and was the number one ranked Governor at the time John McCain picked her to be his running mate.
Read her book, "Going Rogue" to get the whole back story of who Sarah Palin is. She is definitely NOT a "creation", although she is a self-made woman.
Thank you.
We all need to beat on the doors in our neighborhoods, of people that don't vote, tell them what direction is up, and drive them to the polls, on Nov. 2.
Then, we need to resume the cleaning up of the GOP.
“Waving the white flag while wetting your pants is not the way to win wars.”
I’m not waving the white flag.
This war is only winnable if it turns into a shooting war and our military is on our side. However too many of our generals wave the white flag and wet there pants politically.
We, the American people have enough guns to fight a war. But the problem is the war on us is not being fought with guns. It has been waged in the universities and colleges since the 1930’s. We have two generations to retrain. Can it be done? Maybe, the rise of the tea party leading to this November elections will tell the tale. But still, the American people have a short memory. The lefties have had few better chances of world domination than now. I fear they won’t let go without getting very nasty.
Warning to us all!
The Soviet Revolution started out as a grassroots revolt against the ruling classes. It was co-opted by a very small group of dedicated Communists. There is a possibility of this happening here. The Commies who elected Obama are pissed that he isn’t radical enough. Who knows what they might try if there is a general societal breakdown.
Be vigilant!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.