Sarah Jane Lindsay, 42, single and has two sons 
Posted on 09/22/2010 9:49:09 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
From the other thread link on this story, the picture I posted is actually Sarah Jane Lindsay.
Low standards abound here at FR where women one might be able to tap are concerned.
Sounds like servicing the wrong community is what got these broads in trouble in the first place.
IN the thread posted earlier, there was a facebook caapture posted of her. Don’t know the date but, it appears that she has some new cha-chas!
Nice rack...
woof!
LOL
Sarah Jane Lindsay, 42, single and has two sons
The NEA strikes again, the biggest, richest pedophile syndicate in existence.
Make-up (or lack thereof) sure makes a lot of difference, doesn’t it? I suspect these women looked a little different at their little ‘parties’. There’s something ‘mental’ going these women, though...plenty of frat houses you could ‘party’ at...stay away from kids.
remember the days of hot teacher meant a favor to young men?
Boys aren’t penetrated - boys dont get pregnant.
In a bar they would be “2’s” at 10(pm) and “10’s” at 2(am).
there are no more schools for wayward girls. Shotgun marriages are frowned up.
Pregnancy is not hypothetical or partial.
“I have yet to see a similar story with male teachers being labeled guilty or not guilty because of their appearance. For some reason, some of the men on FR thinks it’s okay to say they’d “hit it” and “not guilty” when the public trust was violated and, worse, boys and girls are subjected to spiritual, emotional and physical danger by those whom were supposed to simply teach school subjects.”
There are a couple of issues.
1. The act
2. Trust and predation
Is the act wrong? Sure. Just as wrong as if they did it with a loose girl of their own age. Is it predatory? Some boys (and men) can get excited about females in authority and becoming . . . in a position of authority with them. It could be predatory on the teacher’s part, but is much less likely. They don’t have to lie. “You want something quick with an older female with some authority with no strings attached?” Yeah. That’s not going to get any takers.
For females, is the act wrong? Yes. Is it predatory? Since the male authority figure probably lied about “love” and used his position to convince her to trust and believe him, then yes.
There *is* a difference between boys and girls. Girls want love and boys want something else. In this case, the boys got what they wanted. In girls’ cases it is extremely rare they get what they want.
I can also tell you this, when I was 15 there were some teachers who, at the time, I wished would violate my public trust. It didn’t happen, but I’m almost certain it wouldn’t have scarred me for life. I have yet to meet a male yet who said their memories are different. “Hot For Teacher” was a hit for a reason.
The NEA strikes again, the biggest, richest pedophile syndicate in existence.
********
Some lay Catholic, or lay Catholic organization would do well to do some statistical comparisons and contrasts and make them public. The hypocrisy is glaring.
Back in the not so far distant days when womanhood was equated with the maternal instinct, this would have been ranked in with other unspeakable acts that seem too commonplace today.
bump
Door # 2 - Throw away the key, but cut it into itty bitty pieces first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.