Oops! Forgot h/t to Adam Baldwin on Twitter.
“I tried every male friend, gay, straight, married and single, but it was really difficult to find somebody,” said Karen
That ought to tell you something.
You know, I used to think it would be the worst thing ever to take a child from his parents and let the State place the kid in a foster home somewhere.
I ain’t so sure anymore.
Guess what, Karen! He’ll be your child’s father for the rest of their lives. Kind of makes you think, doesn’t it?
I feel badly about how hard I’m laughing, and not just because I’m spluttering on the keyboard.
Now, here's a title that I didn't think I would see today.
LOL.
This sentence got me.
“Why not allow for more than two parents? Having a psychological parent and a biological parent expands their horizons.”
What a disaster this culture is courting.
Sounds like a bad TV movie.
What a great idea! What could possibly go wrong?
Can't make this stuff up.
I’m surprised the daily “white trash expo” shows aren’t having a bidding war over this story. It certainly has “freak show” written all over it.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
From the actions have consequences category. Unfortunately it's the children that pay for the parents emotional and mental instability. This case highlights why homosexuals should not have children. And why IVF and artificial insemination is dangerous for kids. Social engineering is not a child's best friend.
When she met Daniel, who worked in retail, he "seemed sincere," according to Karen. "He brought me a big bag of groceries and all is diplomas and childhood pictures. He wanted me to know he was a decent guy."
Well there you go then! Start a family!
“...even telling the doctor he was Karen’s husband, even though he was gay.”
Author somehow assumes that someone who is gay can’t/wouldn’t lie?
He signed a “layman’s” agreement....
they did it with parental rights and visitation.
He has standing, the right to see the father is the child’s not the mother.
As said before, love has nothing to do with marriage, it is all about children. Every child has a mother and a father.
In this case it is two weirdos but is still mommy and daddy. (and a woman’s sex fetish “companion”)
Go to San Diego, find a nice guy, get fresh with him, tell him your name is Suzi and that you are from Nashville and that you are on the pill. Never speak to him again. How difficult is this?
When I read these things it’s all about wants of the *parents* not about the needs of the children. These are pathetic people. They should just get a puppy. Well, no, even puppies deserve better.
Here’s a easy solution, a man not married to the mother has no paternal rights.
everything is wrong with this story, everything
Imagine if it were 1965, and you looked into a window while walking down the street and saw a newspaper with that headline. Aside from stopping dead in your tracks while your eyes widened and your jaw dropped, you'd think you accidentally wandered into the bad side of town and happened upon one of those "book stores" that usually lacked windows, and for good reason.
Today, no one even blinks. That's "Progress" for you.