Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County Sues Farmer, Cites Too Many Crops
WSBTV.com ^ | dated: 10:00 am EDT September 13, 2010 | None LISTED

Posted on 09/13/2010 8:29:16 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg

DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. -- DeKalb County is suing a local farmer for growing too many vegetables, but he said he will fight the charges in the ongoing battle neighbors call “Cabbagegate.”

Fig trees, broccoli and cabbages are among the many greens that line the soil on Steve Miller’s more than two acres in Clarkston, who said he has spent fifteen years growing crops to give away and sell at local farmers markets

(Excerpt) Read more at wsbtv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: farmer; food; obamanation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
OK, now we are fining citizens for being too productive...

Welcome to the Obmanation!

1 posted on 09/13/2010 8:29:18 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Here is the video: http://www.wsbtv.com/video/24981915/index.html


2 posted on 09/13/2010 8:31:29 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Years ago I worked with a Chinese woman who tended to laugh at inappropriate times (I’m told this is very Chinese).

At one point (for some reason) I mentioned pumpkins, which I consider a very New England type of vegetable and I said that she may not have eaten one — “Oh no!” she said, “In China we grew many pumpkins! My district in China was famous for pumpkins! My grandfather grew more pumpkins than anyone else in our village!”

Then she started giggling and added “That’s why they killed him.”

Reminder: Obama hung pictures of Chairman Mao on his Christmas tree.


3 posted on 09/13/2010 8:31:56 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Things will change after the revolution, but not before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
OK, now we are fining citizens for being too productive...

You mean besides "progressive" taxes?

4 posted on 09/13/2010 8:33:17 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 597 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"You mean besides "progressive" taxes?"

Well said!

5 posted on 09/13/2010 8:34:16 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
"If we were directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want for bread." -- Thomas Jefferson
6 posted on 09/13/2010 8:34:47 AM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I pronounce this world insane.


7 posted on 09/13/2010 8:34:55 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I’ve heard that laugh.

It can mean anything BUT humor.


8 posted on 09/13/2010 8:35:07 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 597 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Clintonfatigued; All

This farmer is in Georgia???? Where’s his congressional delegation looking out for his rights. In 1998, the entire delegation (led by NEWT) demanded the Clinton administration STOP all workplace raids of illegal aliens because their big donor, big ag vidalia onion growers wanted cheap labor.

But this is an individual USA citizen farmer, with no rights in this society.


9 posted on 09/13/2010 8:36:23 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

In Georgia a while back the Revenooer would of been tarred feathered and run off. I hope the South Rises Again before it is too late.


10 posted on 09/13/2010 8:37:54 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Red_Devil 232

I say, the more vegetables people grow on theri property — the better!


11 posted on 09/13/2010 8:38:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

The farmer should have filled his butt with rock salt.


12 posted on 09/13/2010 8:38:58 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

This is ‘getting the job done’ to all bureaucrats. Wait’ll they get their hands on healthcare.


13 posted on 09/13/2010 8:39:44 AM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

One of the reasons the dumb as stumps Carter fambly didn’t starve to death was that old, old man Carter had/got one of the few federal PERMITS to grow and sell....peanuts. Yes, you are not free to grow and sell peanuts. So, the fambly in its slow generational decent into imbecility had a license to print money.

As it has been for 70 or so years, growing anything is held by the fedgov paid judges to be engaging in interstate commerce, even if the crops don’t leave your land, and so fedgov, it’s minions, agents, hacks can tell you what to do.

In short, we are serfs on rented fedgov property. ( You just think you own it. You don’t. You exist there at the pleasure of fedgov, stategov )


14 posted on 09/13/2010 8:41:44 AM PDT by Leisler ("Over time they create a legal system that plunders and a moral code that glorifies it." F. Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
OK, now we are fining citizens for being too productive...

On their own property!

The people of the U.S. are no longer a free people.

15 posted on 09/13/2010 8:41:58 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

FDR began the insanity of paying farmers not to plant.

The ‘progressives’ wanted to control every aspect of our lives.

Sound familiar?


16 posted on 09/13/2010 8:43:42 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

You gotta be kidding??? Why in the world would anybody care how many veggies a farmer grows? That’s what farmer do y’know!


17 posted on 09/13/2010 8:51:45 AM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Where have you been since the first Great Depression?

See Wickard v. Filburn...


18 posted on 09/13/2010 8:56:19 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 597 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Uh, 1942, not the First Great Depression.


19 posted on 09/13/2010 8:57:55 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 597 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity. A farmer, Roscoe Filburn, was growing wheat to feed his chickens. The U.S. government had imposed limits on wheat production based on acreage owned by a farmer, in order to drive up wheat prices during the Great Depression, and Filburn was growing more than the limits permitted. Filburn was ordered to destroy his crops and pay a fine, even though he was producing the excess wheat for his own use and had no intention of selling it.

The Supreme Court, interpreting the United States Constitution's Commerce Clause under Article 1 Section 8 (which permits the United States Congress "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;") decided that, because Filburn's wheat growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for chicken feed on the open market, and because wheat was traded nationally, Filburn's production of more wheat than he was allotted was affecting interstate commerce, and so could be regulated by the federal government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

20 posted on 09/13/2010 8:58:38 AM PDT by Gordon Pym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson