Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just What Is Mike Castle’s Voting Record? (Without the histrionics)
National Review ^ | September 7, 2010 | Jim Geraght

Posted on 09/13/2010 6:05:13 AM PDT by tlb

...a state registered Democrats outnumber Republicans 329,000 to 179,000.

Castle voting history suggests he will vote with conservatives 52 percent of the time. If Coons is elected and votes in a pattern similar to Delaware’s other senator, he will vote the conservative 12 percent; if he emulates current Democratic senator Ted Kaufman, he will vote the conservative position 4 percent.

Over his 17 complete years in the U.S. House of Representatives, Castle has voted the conservative position, as defined by the American Conservative Union, about 52 percent of the time. In 2009, ACU scored Castle at 56.

Castle opposed the Lilly Ledbetter pay act, which the ACU described as a “new Pandora’s Box for trial lawyers.” He voted for a bill that would prevent the Treasury from spending the $350 billion that remained in the TARP program. He opposed the Obama stimulus. He voted against efforts to water down legislation barring federal funds to ACORN or other organizations that employ people who have been convicted of election-law violations. He voted to eliminate the earmark for the airport near Johnstown, Pa., named after Rep. John Murtha. He voted to cut discretionary government spending in the appropriations for the Departments of Housing and Transportation by 5 percent.

He supported an amendment to the health-care bill that would ban using taxpayer funds to provide abortion services, an interesting vote for a self-described pro-choice Republican. He voted against the health-care bill.

Castle thinks trying to repeal Obamacare while Obama is president is a waste of time, but he’s open to the idea if the GOP can regain control of the White House:

This is not some new position shift, spurred by the impending primary; the video above is from April.

Castle’s sense that any repeal effort would be unable to overcome a presidential veto..

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: acu; castle; coon; odonnell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: mac_truck

I would posit that being able to stop Obama’s liberal agenda and eventually to be able to pass a conservative agenda is the “forest,” and the petty fight between a RINO and a gadfly in Delaware is a mere “tree.” Castle gets us Chairman Sessions and all that entails; O’Donnell (i.e., Coons) gets us Chairman Leahy.


41 posted on 09/13/2010 7:19:38 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason
There is a line which shouldn't be crossed in primaries. To me, the Establishment crossed that line.

In regards to O'Donnell, you are right about all her problems. Filing a lawsuit? How dare she! Having financial problems? How stupid of her!

You're right. Elect Jim Jeffords....er, I mean, Arlen Specter...sorry...I mean Mike Castle.

42 posted on 09/13/2010 7:26:47 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tlb
"Castle voting history suggests he will vote with conservatives 52 percent of the time."

Dear Jim, we don't want a half time RINO. That type of political thought is so yesterday.

43 posted on 09/13/2010 7:27:50 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought; LeonardFMason

>>> FYI, Hotair has now weighed in...

So they have:

” If control of the Senate comes down to this race, and it very well might, would it be better to have a Republican squish holding the seat and give the GOP control of the Senate floor and all the committees,

or to hand it to either Harry Reid or Chuck Schumer for the next two-year period in which we’ll see at least one Supreme Court retirement and Obama still attempting to push through his radical agenda? “


44 posted on 09/13/2010 7:28:27 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I haven't followed this one closely and I'm interested in what others think of this comment.

In this interview:

Christine O'Donnell / Dan Gaffney Radio Show

Christine O'Donnell talked live (I believe) with a radio station.

It raised a lot of eyebrows because the host called her out on a comment she had made to a group of people in which she claimed that she had won 2 of the 3 Delaware counties against Joe Biden in 2008. In fact, she did not win those counties.

This isn't innuendo since the host had an audio of the statement, and you are able to listen to both parties in the audio link.

If you have time, listen to the interview or skim through the comments at the site to get a better idea of what the discussion is about.

My opinion is that she doesn't have that bedrock image that candidates such as Sarah Palin, Jan Brewer, Scott Brown or Joe Miller have.

That doesn't necessarily mean voting for Castle is better.

45 posted on 09/13/2010 7:30:18 AM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Castle is a gun grabbing baby killer and you think we win if he is reelected? You treat this like it's a team sport. You don't care what his stand on the major issues are as long as he has an R next to his name?

Is there ANY issue or set of issues that you would not be willing to concede just to get another R?

46 posted on 09/13/2010 7:45:50 AM PDT by Robbin (If Sarah isnÂ’t welcome, IÂ’m not welcome, itÂ’s just that simpleÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

hmmm, for a goldwater anything, you sure drink the leftist KoolAid by the gallon... maybe the 0 Right to Life score or the F from the NRA for Castle don’t make a diff to you, so how about a 26% rating for votes with the Dem Congress even way lower than Spector that same year. He worked WITH the state Dems to switch offices giving the Govenorship to them with NO OPPOSITION, and you want to vote for him for Senate???
Vote him OUT now, and quit smearing a candidate that did as well as McCain in a presidential year. it’s now or never and Castle is the disaster, not Christine...

ymmv


47 posted on 09/13/2010 7:48:54 AM PDT by ElectionInspector (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
YEP, more "centrists" begging conservatives not to desert the RINO!!

I'm totally fed up with voting "yea" on a "moderate" (aka person who is defined as "moderate" by other "moderates" when each know that the person will be voting for higher taxes every time as well as other liberal sacred cows.

Yes, Castle did vote "right" in some cases but usually they were "safe votes" that he'd never support if they had the chance to see the light of day and making it into law.

48 posted on 09/13/2010 7:55:20 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robbin
You treat this like it's a team sport.

It is a team sport, Robbin.

49 posted on 09/13/2010 7:56:25 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
I'm totally fed up with voting "yea" on a "moderate" (aka person who is defined as "moderate" by other "moderates" when each know that the person will be voting for higher taxes every time as well as other liberal sacred cows.

How do you feel about having candidates who are electable in the general election?

50 posted on 09/13/2010 8:00:39 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: tlb
“or to hand it to either Harry Reid or Chuck Schumer for the next two-year period in which we’ll see at least one Supreme Court retirement and Obama still attempting to push through his radical agenda?“

Exactly. In politics it's all about numbers. If defeating Castle means the Republicans lose a seat, a near certainty with O'Donnell in the general election, and a chance of becoming the majority in the Senate, it would be a disaster.

To be clear, I am no fan of Castle. I am also no fan of losing. If the net result of the 2010 election is Chuck Schumer or Harry Reid as Majority Leader of the Senate, then for a certainty this country will suffer greatly. The magic number is 51. How do we get to 51 to prevent this tragedy?

I find this near maniacal hunt for Moby "RINO" Dick a little short-sighted if in the end we end up with a Democrat Senate majority.

51 posted on 09/13/2010 8:21:00 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ElectionInspector

I have no pretentions as to Castle being anything other than a liberal. Read my tag line; I wouldn’t trust Castle as far as I can throw him. As I have said repeatedly, I would have supported any qualified, responsible, honest conservative who ran against Castle. Unfortunately, none did. And if I have to choose between Castle in the Senate and Jeff Sessions as Chairman of Judiciary or Coons in the Senate and Pat Leahy as Chairman of Judiciary, I’ll choose Castle and Sessions.

Conservatives can indeed win in Delaware, but they can’t be unqualified, irresponsible and dishonest. I hope that it doesn’t take two more years of Pat Leahy chairing the Judiciary Committee in order to learn that lesson.


52 posted on 09/13/2010 8:53:30 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Stuff it. Castle is exactly the kind of creep we don't want in DC. A career politician who fights harder against conservatives than against liberals.

Time to retire, Mike.
53 posted on 09/13/2010 9:07:38 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's long past time for conservatives to stop voting for Republican liberals. Enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
And I think the movement beclowns itself by latching on to flawed candidates in the name of purity.

Beclown? Good gravy.

Here's the story. Mike Castle is basically a Democrat running as a Republican. He's pro-abortion which basically eliminates him from any consideration in my personal opinion. The fact that he's also a fiscal liberal is just another nail in his coffin.

Conservatives should never "beclown" themselves by voting for slimy career politician liberals like Mike Castle.
54 posted on 09/13/2010 9:11:15 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's long past time for conservatives to stop voting for Republican liberals. Enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
How do you feel about having candidates who are electable in the general election?

Pass. Every time we choose some one who is supposedly "electable" who is not conservative, we set the party back. It's better to have a known enemy in a seat rather than a false friend.

New rule for conservatives. NEVER vote for a liberal, regardless of party.
55 posted on 09/13/2010 9:15:21 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's long past time for conservatives to stop voting for Republican liberals. Enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Pass. Every time we choose some one who is supposedly "electable" who is not conservative, we set the party back. It's better to have a known enemy in a seat rather than a false friend.

No, it's not.

It's better to have control over the committees and rules of the House and Senate.

Then you can work on finding palatable candidates.

56 posted on 09/13/2010 9:19:31 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Dear Antoninus,

“New rule for conservatives. NEVER vote for a liberal, regardless of party.”

Although we voted for him twice before, my wife and I have come to a similar conclusion, and we won't be voting for Bob Ehrlich in Maryland this time.


sitetest

57 posted on 09/13/2010 10:01:32 AM PDT by sitetest ( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kabar

You wisely explain why the GOP is so ineffective on so many matters.


58 posted on 09/13/2010 10:14:56 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

O’Donnell - Opposes babykilling.

Castle - Supports babykilling.

It’s just that simple. Why does supporting babykilling make one ‘electible’, and ‘responsible’? I call that offensive, irresponsible, and downright dishonest that he’s being sold to us as the best choice.


59 posted on 09/13/2010 11:54:28 AM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Great, and when he backstabs us like Jumpin’ Jim did? Having him be the deciding vote is like having no vote at all.


60 posted on 09/13/2010 11:55:40 AM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson