O’Donnell - Opposes babykilling.
Castle - Supports babykilling.
It’s just that simple. Why does supporting babykilling make one ‘electible’, and ‘responsible’? I call that offensive, irresponsible, and downright dishonest that he’s being sold to us as the best choice.
Please read my posts #21, 22 and 52 in this very thread. As I have written ad nauseum, I do not believe for one second that Delaware can’t elect a conservative to the U.S. Senate. However, I do believe that, irrespective of how conservative or cute Christine O’Donnell may be, the fact that she’s proven to be an unqualified, irresponsible, dishonest gadfly means that she has absolutely no chance of winning the general election running as a Republican in Delaware.
Regarding the specific issue of abortion, please read my tag line. Castle is pro-abortion, and I wouldn’t trust him as far as I can throw him. And as I have said repeatedly, I would have supported any qualified, responsible, honest conservative who ran against Castle. Unfortunately, none did. And if I have to choose between Castle in the Senate and Jeff Sessions as Chairman of Judiciary or Coons in the Senate and Pat Leahy as Chairman of Judiciary, I’ll choose Castle and Sessions. If you care about ending abortion, you should support a candidate whose mere election may place Sessions in the Chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee (Castle could indeed be the 10th Republican pickup in the Senate), where judicial confirmation hearings will be held, over a candidate whose nomination will result in the Democrats holding the seat and most likely having the pro-abortion Leahy keep the Judiciary Chairmanship.